规则敏感型高质量就业评价逻辑——基于新生代样本的结构模型检验
The Logic of Rule-Sensitive High-Quality Employment Evaluation—A Structural Model Test Based on the New Generation Sample
摘要: 本文围绕高质量就业的主观评价结构展开实证分析,构建包含工资福利、就业能力、就业保护、就业声望、就业环境与就业嵌入六个维度的结构模型,并基于404份新生代样本采用结构方程模型(SEM)检验其权重结构与评价逻辑。研究发现,在多维资源竞争情境下,制度保障与规则公平在整体评价中的权重不低于收益性资源,呈现出“规则敏感型”评价逻辑特征。本文从资源保存理论与公平理论出发,揭示高质量就业评价逻辑正在发生结构性调整,为理解新生代就业质量判断机制提供新的理论视角。
Abstract: This paper presents an empirical analysis of the subjective evaluation structure of high-quality employment. It constructs a structural model encompassing six dimensions—wages and benefits, employability, employment protection, employment prestige, employment environment, and employment embeddedness, and employs structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the weighting structure and evaluation logic based on a sample of 404 individuals from the new generation. The study finds that in a context of competition over multidimensional resources, the weight of institutional guarantees and rule fairness in the overall evaluation is no less significant than that of resource-related benefits, revealing a distinctive “rule-sensitive” logic of evaluation. Drawing on conservation of resources theory and fairness theory, this paper uncovers a structural shift in the evaluation logic of high-quality employment, offering a new theoretical perspective for understanding the mechanisms underlying the new generation’s assessment of employment quality.
文章引用:王卓, 麦智杰, 李珍, 谭剑音, 江君, 吴婕. 规则敏感型高质量就业评价逻辑——基于新生代样本的结构模型检验[J]. 统计学与应用, 2026, 15(5): 53-62. https://doi.org/10.12677/sa.2026.155106

参考文献

[1] 吴珊, 郭航, 张也驰, 张壬壬. 中国式现代化进程中就业质量对充分就业影响研究[J]. 调研世界, 2024(9): 3-16.
[2] González, P., Sehnbruch, K., Apablaza, M., Méndez Pineda, R. and Arriagada, V. (2021) A Multidimensional Approach to Measuring Quality of Employment (QoE) Deprivation in Six Central American Countries. Social Indicators Research, 158, 107-141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Veen, A., Barratt, T., Goods, C. and Baird, M. (2025) “Woeful Pay, but Still, I Enjoy It”: Refining Subjective Job Quality in Ride‐Share Work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 41, 15-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Wan, W. and Cao, T. (2022) Linking Decent Work and Well-Being among Chinese Millennial Employees: A Psychology of Working Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article ID: 909423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 陈希. 平台经济就业者劳动权研究[J]. 济南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 34(5): 157-170.
[6] Tang, N., Zhen, D. and Guan, J. (2024) Work Values of Chinese Generational Cohorts. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 56, 876-894.
[7] Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Nachreiner, F. and Schaufeli, W.B. (2001) The Job Demands-Resources Model of Burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Hobfoll, S.E. (1989) Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O.L.H. and Ng, K.Y. (2001) Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]