从语义副词到话语标记——“Well”的语义演变与语法化研究
From a Semantic Adverb to a Discourse Marker—A Study on the Semantic Evolution and Grammaticalization of “Well”
摘要: 本文以英语高频词Well为研究对象,结合历时与共时研究视角,依托多语料库实证,系统梳理其从古英语到现代英语以功能分层扩展、优势功能梯度转移为核心的四阶段语义演变轨迹,剖析重新分析、语用强化、类推及隐喻等核心语法化机制与认知、社会成因。本研究在Jucker等经典研究的基础上,补充了其未充分覆盖的古英语源义溯源与现代英语功能泛化的系统考察,修正了传统线性演变观的局限。研究发现Well的演变呈现语义虚化、功能泛化的梯度特征,不同功能层长期共存、动态竞争,整体趋势印证了语法化单向性规律,为同类话语标记的语法化研究提供了参考范式。
Abstract: Taking the high-frequency English item “Well” as its subject, this paper adopts a combined diachronic and synchronic approach and draws on multi-corpus empirical evidence to systematically trace its four-stage semantic evolution from Old English to Modern English, which is characterized by hierarchical functional expansion and the gradient shift of dominant functions, and to examine the core grammaticalization mechanisms—including reanalysis, pragmatic strengthening, analogy, and metaphor—as Well as the cognitive and social motivations underlying this process. Building on the classic research by Jucker, the present study supplements the systematic investigation of the etymological origins in Old English and functional generalization in Modern English that have not been fully addressed in previous work, and revises the limitations of the traditional linear model of evolution. The findings indicate that the evolution of Well displays gradient features of semantic bleaching and functional generalization, with different functional layers coexisting and competing dynamically over an extended period; the overall trend confirms the unidirectionality principle of grammaticalization and provides a reference paradigm for the grammaticalization study of analogous discourse markers.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Hopper, P.J. and Traugott, E.C. (2003) Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
Jucker, A.H. (1997) The Discourse Marker Well in the History of English. English Language and Linguistics, 1, 91-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
刘坚, 曹广顺, 吴福祥. 论诱发汉语词汇语法化的若干因素[J]. 中国语文, 1995(3): 161-169.
|
|
[4]
|
吴福祥. 近年来语法化研究的进展[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2004, 36(1): 18-24.
|
|
[5]
|
沈家煊. 语用原则, 语用推理和语义演变[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2004, 36(4): 243-251.
|
|
[6]
|
Ito, R. and Tagliamonte, S. (2003) Well Weird, Right Dodgy, Very Strange, Really Cool: Layering and Recycling in English Intensifiers. Language in Society, 32, 257-279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Mykhaylenko, V. (2019) Exploring English-Ukrainian Contrastive Phraseology. Науковий вісник Ужгородського університету. Серія Філологія, 2, 68-72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Lehmann, C. (1985) Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change. Lingua e Stile.
|
|
[9]
|
胡范铸. 元主体、社会身份、情景角色: 言语主体范畴的重新分析[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版), 2024, 66(3): 90-103.
|
|
[10]
|
Traugott, E.C. (1995) The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization. International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, 13-18 August 1995, 123.
|
|
[11]
|
陈忠敏. 语法化的类别、特点及机制[J]. 当代修辞学, 2021(6): 1-14.
|
|
[12]
|
金龙. 从视觉动词到语气词——椒江话“望”的主观化[J]. 语言科学, 2022, 21(4): 365-377.
|