社会–认知语用视角下大语言模型识别与生成反讽能力的探究
Exploring the Ability of Large Language Models to Recognize and Generate Irony: A Sociocognitive Pragmatic Perspective
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.145393, PDF,   
作者: 郭东梅, 白丽梅:西北师范大学外国语学院,甘肃 兰州
关键词: 大语言模型社会认知语用学DeepSeek反讽Large Language Models Socio-Cognitive Pragmatics DeepSeek Irony
摘要: 本研究以社会认知语用学为理论基础,选取《脱口秀大会》中的反讽话语为语料,考察大语言模型DeepSeek识别与生成反讽的能力。通过一系列提示语,探究DeepSeek如何利用语境机制、凸显机制与合作–自我中心机制来处理反讽表达。并分析其基于社会认知语用学生成反讽语料的表现。研究发现,DeepSeek能够借助上述机制识别反讽话语,但在处理涉及文化背景语境的表达可能出现偏差;该模型能依据提示语设计出符合社会认知语用学特点的反讽语料,但其表达可能较为直白。针对这些局限,本文进一步探讨了通过改进训练数据、调整模型架构及优化提示工程策略等可操作的优化路径。鉴于反讽是一种复杂且多功能的现象,本研究不仅有助于提升公众对人工智能技术使用的认识,也为评估大语言模型提供了新的理论视角,并探讨了优化其语用能力的可能路径。
Abstract: Grounded in sociocognitive pragmatics, this study selects ironic utterances from the stand-up comedy show Rock & Roast as its corpus to examine the ability of the Large Language Model DeepSeek to recognize and generate irony. Through a series of prompts, the study explores how DeepSeek processes ironic expressions by leveraging contextual salience, salience, and the cooperation-egocentrism mechanisms, and analyzes its performance in generating ironic utterances informed by sociocognitive pragmatics. The findings reveal that DeepSeek can identify ironic utterances with the help of these mechanisms, though deviations may occur when cultural context contextual information is involved. The model is also able to generate ironic utterances that align with sociocognitive pragmatics based on the prompts, but its output tends to be overly explicit. In response to these limitations, this paper further discusses actionable optimization pathways through improving training data, adjusting model architecture, and refining prompt engineering strategies. Given that irony is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon, this study not only helps enhance public awareness of the application of artificial intelligence technologies, but also offers a new theoretical perspective for evaluating large language models and explores possible pathways for optimizing their pragmatic competence.
文章引用:郭东梅, 白丽梅. 社会–认知语用视角下大语言模型识别与生成反讽能力的探究[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(5): 212-221. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.145393

参考文献

[1] Gordijn, B. and Have, H.T. (2023) ChatGPT: Evolution or Revolution? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 26, 1-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Chomsky, N., Roberts, I. and Watumull, J. (2023) Noam Chomsky: The False Promise of ChatGPT. The New York Times.
[3] Kuteeva, M. and Andersson, M. (2024) Diversity and Standards in Writing for Publication in the Age of AI—Between a Rock and a Hard Place. Applied Linguistics, 45, 561-567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Shen, X., Chen, Z., Backes, M. and Zhang, Y. (2023) In ChatGPT We Trust? Measuring and Characterizing the Reliability of ChatGPT. arXiv:2304.08979.
[5] Dwivedi, Y.K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E.L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A.K., et al. (2023) Opinion Paper: “So What If ChatGPT Wrote It?” Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI for Research, Practice and Policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Dynel, M. (2023) Lessons in Linguistics with ChatGPT: Metapragmatics, Metacommunication, Metadiscourse and Metalanguage in Human-AI Interactions. Language & Communication, 93, 107-124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Kocoń, J., Cichecki, I., Kaszyca, O., Kochanek, M., Szydło, D., Baran, J., et al. (2023) ChatGPT: Jack of All Trades, Master of None. Information Fusion, 99, Article 101861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Chen, L., Zaharia, M. and Zou, J. (2024) How Is ChatGPT’s Behavior Changing over Time? Harvard Data Science Review, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Yu, D., Bondi, M. and Hyland, K. (2024) Can GPT-4 Learn to Analyse Moves in Research Article Abstracts? Applied Linguistics, 47, 54-72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Bender, E.M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A. and Shmitchell, S. (2021) On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Virtual Event, 3-10 March 2021, 610-623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 张慧敏. DeepSeek-R1是怎样炼成的? [J]. 深圳大学学报(理工版), 2025, 42(2): 226-232.
[12] Cusumano, M.A. (2025) DeepSeek Inside: Origins, Technology, and Impact. Communications of the ACM, 68, 18-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Anibal, J., Bedrick, S., Nguyen, H., Gunkel, J., Huth, H., Le, T., et al. (2026) DeepSeek for Healthcare: Do No Harm? AI and Ethics, 6, Article No. 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Liang, W., Chen, P., Zou, X., Lu, X., Liu, S., Yang, J., et al. (2025) DeepSeek: The “Watson” to Doctors—From Assistance to Collaboration. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 17, 1103-1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Zou, B. and Wang, M. (2021) Artificial Intelligence Technology and English Language Teaching and Learning: Present and Future. Foreign Language and Literature, 37, 124-130.
[16] Verma, P., Shukla, N. and Shukla, A.P. (2021) Techniques of Sarcasm Detection: A Review. 2021 International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), Greater Noida, 4-5 March 2021, 968-972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Akimoto, Y., Miyazawa, S. and Muramoto, T. (2012) Comprehension Processes of Verbal Irony: The Effects of Salience, Egocentric Context, and Allocentric Theory of Mind. Metaphor and Symbol, 27, 217-242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 赵虹. 反讽交际的社会-认知语用模型初探[J]. 外语研究, 2025.,42(2): 49-54.
[19] Wen, X. and Tian, Y. (2025) Understanding Ironic Utterances: A Comprehensive Examination of ChatGPT-4o. Intercultural Pragmatics, 22, 259-283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Kecskes, I. (2013) Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Jiang, W. (2017) A Socio-Cognitive Approach to Pragmatic Inference. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14, 421-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Shelley, C. (2001) The Bicoherence Theory of Situational Irony. Cognitive Science, 25, 775-818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Kecskes, I. (2008) Dueling Contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 385-406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 冉永平. 语用学十讲[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2021.
[25] Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (2015) Beyond Speaker’s Meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 15, 117-149.
[26] Deliens, G., Antoniou, K., Clin, E. and Kissine, M. (2017) Perspective-Taking and Frugal Strategies: Evidence from Sarcasm Detection. Journal of Pragmatics, 119, 33-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef