AI合成影视作品中肖像权可识别性的认定规则研究
Research on the Identification Rules of Identifiability of Portrait Rights in AI-Generated Film and Television Works
DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2026.145133, PDF,   
作者: 郭永莎:石河子大学法学院,新疆 石河子
关键词: AI合成肖像权可识别性AI Modification Portrayal Rights Identifiability
摘要: 人工智能时代的到来,催生了AI合成经典影视作品这样的新型创作形式。短视频内容创作者借助AI换脸、深度合成等技术,对影视作品中的角色形象进行替换,甚至是恶搞。这种行为引发了不少关于肖像权保护的争议,其中最为核心的就是如何认定它是否侵犯了演员的肖像权?传统的可识别性认定规则,在AI合成的场景下,面临着识别对象、识别主体、识别方式三重认定困境。通过对现行规则的规范分析,在认定对象上应从单一的面部特征扩展为包括动态特征、角色标志性元素在内的要素集合;在认定主体上,确立以一般社会公众标准为基础、技术识别能力为补充的双重标准协同机制;在认定方式上,引入合成可识别性概念,从真实对应到合成指向。这套规则体系,既回应了AI技术对传统法律带来的冲击,也为司法实践提供了更具操作性的认定标准,在保护演员肖像权和保障创作自由之间寻求平衡。
Abstract: The advent of the AI era has given rise to a new form of creation: AI-modified classic film and television works. Short video content creators use AI face-swapping and deep synthesis technologies to replace or even parody the character images in film and television works. This behavior has sparked many disputes over the protection of portrayal rights, with the core issue being how to determine whether it infringes upon the portrayal rights of actors. The traditional recognition rules for identifiability face three major challenges in the context of AI modification: the identification object, the identification subject, and the identification method. Through an analysis of the current rules, this paper proposes that the identification object should be expanded from a single facial feature to a set of elements including dynamic features and role-specific elements; the identification subject should establish a dual standard coordination mechanism based on the general public standard and supplemented by technical identification capabilities; and the identification method should introduce the concept of synthetic identifiability, shifting from real correspondence to synthetic indication. This rule system not only responds to the impact of AI technology on traditional law but also provides more operational recognition standards for judicial practice, seeking a balance between protecting actors’ portrayal rights and safeguarding creative freedom.
文章引用:郭永莎. AI合成影视作品中肖像权可识别性的认定规则研究[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(5): 65-72. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.145133

参考文献

[1] 项杨春. 生成式AI魔改影视剧的侵权类型与治理[J]. 科技传播, 2025, 17(22): 42-47.
[2] 张健, 魏晓. 断魔而归本: “AI魔改”视频的类型审思[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(4): 85-92.
[3] 王利明.《民法典》人格权编的实施与未来展望[J]. 中国法学, 2026(1): 121-143.
[4] 梁晶晶. AI换脸技术在短视频平台应用中的侵权问题研究[J]. 河南科技, 2025, 52(22): 125-129.
[5] 冉克平. 肖像权上的财产利益及其救济[J]. 清华法学, 2015, 9(4): 67-80.
[6] 逯达. AI “魔改”视频侵权的法律规制研究[J]. 武汉冶金管理干部学院学报, 2025, 35(3): 28-31.
[7] 刘文涛. AI换脸技术的应用风险及法律规制[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2024, 26(2): 60-69.
[8] 张惠彬, 侯仰瑶. 从技术到法律: AI换脸短视频的侵权风险与规范治理[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 40(1): 124-132.
[9] 赵精武. AI换脸侵权之争: 肖像可识别标准的再解释[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2025(5): 168-176.
[10] 阮神裕. 论人工智能时代肖像可识别性的判断标准[J]. 法学家, 2026(1): 15-29+190.
[11] 张红. 民法典之肖像权立法论[J]. 学术研究, 2019(9): 65-74+177.
[12] 王萍. AI换脸视频肖像侵权问题图像分析研究[J]. 全媒体探索, 2023(7): 100-102.
[13] 毛国雄. AI换脸技术浪潮下肖像权保护的困境与出路探究[J]. 中国品牌与防伪, 2025(3): 41-43.
[14] 陆青, 万子怡. 数字时代人格权商业化利用的法理重构: 身份分层理论的展开[J]. 法学研究, 2026, 48(1): 62-80.
[15] 金鑫, 潘振飞, 周温涛. AI换脸中肖像权的延伸保护[J]. 人民司法, 2024(11): 53-57.
[16] 李小曼. AI换脸技术的侵权风险及应对策略[J]. 文化学刊, 2024(6): 135-138.