非物质文化遗产传承语境中谢氏正骨疗法参与乡村振兴的双维协同机制探索
Exploring the Dual-Dimensional Synergistic Mechanism of Xie’s Bone-Setting Therapy in Rural Revitalization within the Context of Intangible Cultural Heritage Inheritance
摘要: 在乡村振兴战略与非物质文化遗产(Intangible Cultural Heritage, ICH)系统性保护深度耦合的政策背景下,传统医药类ICH作为兼具文化资本价值、公共卫生价值与产业转化潜力的复合型资源,日益成为激发乡村内生性发展能力的关键文化资本载体。本文以“谢氏正骨疗法”这一具有清晰家族源流谱系(眉山谢氏)与地域文化根系的传统中医正骨技艺为分析单元,系统考察其在ICH传承与乡村振兴双重制度语境下的协同演进逻辑。文献计量与内容分析表明,既有研究虽已证实ICH与乡村振兴存在显著正向耦合关系,但针对具体ICH项目、尤其是中医正骨类技艺的微观作用路径仍显薄弱;现有实践多集中于文化旅游融合或产业园区建设等单维干预模式,缺乏对“文化传承力–产业转化力”双维动态互构机制的学理阐释。本研究基于协同理论与系统耦合模型,整合30篇文献覆盖的学术共识与实证案例,重点解析谢氏正骨疗法在文化本体活化、乡村健康服务嵌入、产业链条延伸及数字化传承创新四个维度的实践进展与结构性张力。研究表明,其双维协同路径的核心机制在于构建“以技载道、以业固本、以数赋能、以人继脉”的闭环系统。未来亟需突破传承人老龄化、技术标准化缺失、知识产权法律保障缺位及城乡要素配置失衡等系统性瓶颈。本综述为传统医药类ICH的创造性转化与创新性发展提供了兼具理论解释力与实践操作性的分析框架。
Abstract: Against the policy background of the deep coupling between the rural revitalization strategy and the systematic protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH), traditional medicine-related ICH, as a composite resource integrating cultural capital value, public health value, and industrial transformation potential, has increasingly become a key carrier of cultural capital for stimulating endogenous rural development. This paper takes Xie’s Bone-Setting Therapy, a traditional Chinese orthopedic manipulation technique with a clearly traceable family lineage (the Meishan Xie family) and strong regional cultural roots, as the unit of analysis, and systematically examines its logic of collaborative evolution under the dual institutional contexts of ICH inheritance and rural revitalization. Bibliometric and content analyses indicate that, although existing studies have confirmed a significant positive coupling relationship between ICH and rural revitalization, the micro-level pathways of action for specific ICH projects, especially traditional Chinese bone-setting techniques, remain insufficiently explored. Current practices are largely concentrated on single-dimensional intervention models such as the integration of culture and tourism or the construction of industrial parks, while lacking a theoretical explanation of the dual-dimensional dynamic interactive mechanism between cultural inheritance capacity and industrial transformation capacity. Based on synergy theory and a system coupling model, this study integrates academic consensus and empirical cases drawn from 30 references, with a focus on analyzing the practical progress and structural tensions of Xie’s Bone-Setting Therapy in four dimensions: activation of cultural ontology, embedding into rural health services, extension of the industrial chain, and innovation in digital inheritance. The findings show that the core mechanism of its dual-dimensional synergistic pathway lies in building a closed-loop system characterized by “carrying the Dao through technique, consolidating the foundation through industry, empowering through digitalization, and continuing the lineage through people.” In the future, it is imperative to overcome systemic bottlenecks such as the aging of inheritors, the lack of technical standardization, insufficient legal protection of intellectual property rights, and imbalances in the allocation of urban-rural factors. This review provides an analytical framework with both theoretical explanatory power and practical operability for the creative transformation and innovative development of traditional medicine-related ICH.
文章引用:王海亮, 杜晓明, 鲜佳汛, 郑瑶. 非物质文化遗产传承语境中谢氏正骨疗法参与乡村振兴的双维协同机制探索[J]. 交叉科学快报, 2026, 10(3): 633-640. https://doi.org/10.12677/isl.2026.103076

参考文献

[1] 黄秋生, 杨欢欢. 新时代乡村振兴战略的功能地位[J]. 南华大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 21(1): 7-12.
[2] 石辉娴, 杨海龙, 王雨欣. 非物质文化遗产助力乡村振兴发展模式研究[J]. 文化产业, 2022(7): 60-63.
[3] 朱亚飞. 乡村振兴中非物质文化遗产保护传承的价值与路径[J]. 百花, 2022(1): 62-64.
[4] 谭萌. 公共生活视域中非物质文化遗产发展与乡村振兴的耦合机制——基于“撒叶儿嗬”个案的讨论[J]. 西北民族研究, 2021(4): 110-123.
[5] 中办国办印发意见进一步加强非物质文化遗产保护工作[J]. 中国集体经济, 2021(27): 5-9.
[6] https://zwgk.mct.gov.cn/zfxxgkml/fwzwhyc/202106/t20210609_925092.html, 2021-05-25.
[7] https://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2018-09/26/c_1123487123.htm, 2018-09-26.
[8] 周萌. 乡村振兴背景下乡村情感治理的逻辑、困境与实践路径[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2025, 36(24): 128-131.
[9] 赵冬梅, 庞博, 兰天, 等. 河北省乡村振兴与新型城镇化耦合协调发展研究[J]. 华北理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 24(3): 35-44.
[10] 刘丹. 非遗文化生态重构: 价值、困境与实践路径[J]. 中国文化遗产, 2024(6): 92-97.
[11] 杨洪林, 顿山. 非物质文化遗产保护视野下乡村振兴的文化治理转向[J]. 文化艺术研究, 2022(3): 16-23.
[12] 李秀峰. 乡村振兴战略背景下非物质文化遗产保护的研究——以固镇县文化馆非遗保护传承为例[J]. 文化产业, 2022(14): 79-81.
[13] 刘国华, 武青庭, 谢雪姣.《黄帝内经》中的天人相应观再探[J]. 江西中医药, 2017, 48(12): 9-12.
[14] 袁玉斌. 非物质文化遗产的数字化传播与发展研究[J]. 文物鉴定与鉴赏, 2024(21): 157-160.
[15] 温雯, 赵梦笛. 中国非物质文化遗产的数字化场景与构建路径[J]. 理论月刊, 2022(10): 89-99.
[16] 权玺. 非物质文化遗产数字化路线图及其未来发展逻辑[J]. 中国文艺评论, 2022(8): 27-38.
[17] 徐根才, 侯笑宇, 黄运乾. 全媒体时代数字地图创新与实践[J]. 测绘地理信息, 2023, 48(1): 6-9.
[18] 谈国新, 何琪敏. 中国非物质文化遗产数字化传播的研究现状、现实困境及发展路径[J]. 理论月刊, 2021(9): 87-94.
[19] https://zwgk.mct.gov.cn/zfxxgkml/hybz/202308/t20230804_946422.html, 2023-06-29.
[20] 丁慧昌. 非物质文化遗产保护相关法律问题及对策研究[J]. 法制博览, 2022(10): 34-36.
[21] 樊洁馨. 乡村振兴战略下非遗资源开发中的法律问题与对策[J]. 上海商业, 2022(4): 170-172.
[22] 罗钰坊. 传统医药非物质文化遗产的主体与保护主体探析[J]. 铜仁学院学报, 2021, 23(4): 98-106.
[23] 刘华. 数据中的国家级传统医药非物质文化遗产保护问题探析[J]. 卫生软科学, 2022, 36(1): 36-40.
[24] 王玉超, 齐雪霏, 崔灿, 等. 基于非遗调查的传统医药医教结合发展建议[J]. 中国中医药现代远程教育, 2022, 20(8): 186-188.
[25] 郭珺珺. 中医药非物质文化遗产校园推广策略探究[J]. 科技资讯, 2021, 19(8): 246-248+252.
[26] 胡凯, 胡文鹏. 现代学徒制模式中师徒之间默会知识的传递研究[J]. 科教导刊(中旬刊), 2016(2): 41-43.
[27] 王静田, 崔晓雨. “虚拟 + 地理”集聚对地区资源错配的影响研究[J]. 商业经济, 2025(1): 145-149.
[28] 陈姣, 曾芳, 赵凌, 等.《针灸学》“双引擎”立体式协同育人模式改革的探索[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2023, 34(2): 513-514.
[29] 荆海婷. 中国乡村振兴与共同富裕协同发展空间差异及演变趋势[J]. 科技和产业, 2024, 24(19): 126-132.
[30] 唐明慧. 乡村振兴与乡村数字化协同发展的实现路径研究[J]. 智慧农业导刊, 2024, 4(2): 160-163.