基于5A模式的护理干预对下肢骨折患者住院天数及护理满意度的影响
Effect of Nursing Intervention Based on 5A Model on Hospitalization Days and Nursing Satisfaction in Patients with Lower Limb Fractures
DOI: 10.12677/ns.2026.155150, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 宋明芳*, 谈 周, 陈正英#:吉首大学医学院,湖南 吉首;刘平芳:湖南医药学院总医院护理部,湖南 怀化
关键词: 5A护理模式住院天数护理满意度5A Nursing Model Length of Hospital Stay Nursing Satisfaction
摘要: 目的:探讨基于5A模式构建的护理方案在下肢骨折患者中的应用效果,分析其对下肢骨折患者住院天数及护理满意度的影响,为临床优化护理服务、提升护理质量提供参考依据。方法:选取湖南省某医院创伤骨科2025年1月~2025年10月收治的住院患者94例,将1月~5月收治的符合纳排标准的下肢骨折患者作为对照组,6月~10月收治的符合纳排标准的下肢骨折患者作为干预组。对照组实施临床常规护理方案,干预组实施基于5A模式构建的个性化护理方案,比较两组患者住院天数及护理满意度评分。结果:对照组住院天数[21 (13, 29)]天,干预组住院天数[18 (15, 22)]天,两组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.356)。对照组护理满意度[76 (73, 78)]分,干预组护理满意度[91 (87, 93)]分,两组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。结论:基于5A模式构建的护理方案应用于下肢骨折患者中,对缩短患者住院天数无显著效果,但在提升护理满意度、优化临床护理服务质量中,具备临床推广价值。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the application effects of nursing programs constructed based on the 5A model in patients with lower limb fractures, and to analyze their impact on the length of hospital stay and nursing satisfaction of patients with lower limb fractures, providing a reference for optimizing clinical nursing services and improving nursing quality. Methods: A total of 94 hospitalized patients were selected from the Trauma Orthopedics Department of a hospital in Hunan Province from January to October 2025. Patients with lower limb fractures admitted from January to May who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were used as the control group, and patients admitted from June to October who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were used as the intervention group. The control group received the routine clinical nursing plan, while the intervention group received a personalized nursing plan based on the 5A model. The length of hospital stay and nursing satisfaction scores of the two groups were compared. Results: The length of hospital stay for the control group was [21 (13, 29)] days, and for the intervention group was [18 (15, 22)] days, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.356). The nursing satisfaction score was [76 (73, 78)] for the control group and [91 (87, 93)] for the intervention group, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The nursing regimen based on the 5A model applied to patients with lower limb fractures showed no significant effect on reducing hospitalization duration. However, it demonstrates clinical promotion value in enhancing nursing satisfaction and optimizing clinical nursing service quality.
文章引用:宋明芳, 刘平芳, 谈周, 陈正英. 基于5A模式的护理干预对下肢骨折患者住院天数及护理满意度的影响[J]. 护理学, 2026, 15(5): 112-118. https://doi.org/10.12677/ns.2026.155150

参考文献

[1] 刘杰, 杜宁娜, 刘晶晶, 等. 5A模式联合多元化中医护理技术在腰腿痛患者中的应用效果[J]. 中外医药研究, 2024, 3(20): 112-114.
[2] 张静, 荣向霞, 鲍士玉, 等. 基于LEARNS模式的老年共病肺部感染患者护理干预方案的构建及应用研究[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2024, 24(9): 737-742+749.
[3] 张慧. 基于“互联网+”的医院-家庭一体化针对性护理在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的价值[J]. 智慧健康, 2025, 11(35): 9-13.
[4] 王亦璁, 姜宝国. 骨与关节损伤[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012: 83-95.
[5] 付文君. 家庭中心式护理对脑瘫患儿家长生活质量的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2012.
[6] 孙丹, 杨英, 徐璐. 5A模式干预对肺癌靶向治疗患者负性情绪、自我感受负担及生活质量的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2024, 22(16): 1852-1856.
[7] 杜巧琳, 张圆圆. 无缝隙护理应用于消化内科危重症病人护理效果分析[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2019, 6(66): 133.
[8] 陈垂继, 王安辉, 王海鹏, 等. 骨折住院患者出院转归的影响因素分析[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2024, 26(12): 911-917.
[9] Yonai, Y., Ben Natan, M., Shadmi, N., Berkovich, Y. and Steinfeld, Y. (2022) Reasons for Surgical Delay in Patients with Hip Fracture. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 44, 341-346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 计忠宇, 于鸿, 尹同珍, 等. 逆行弹性髓内钉固定技术治疗青少年锁骨中段移位性骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2026, 15(3): 193-199.
[11] 王菲, 兰芷汀, 黄莹. 失效模式与效应分析及PDCA循环对UKA患者围术期及预后的影响[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2026, 32(1): 89-92.