劳动者分层保护视域下的就业保障制度研究
A Study on Employment Security Systems from the Perspective of Tiered Protection for Workers
摘要: 数字经济与多元用工形态的发展,使传统劳动法将劳动者视为同质“抽象弱者”的预设难以适配现实,劳动者群体内部阶层分化显著。本文立足实质正义理念,探讨从“一体保护”向“分层分类保护”的范式转型,通过分析劳动者从属性、议价能力与生存依赖度的差异,构建弱势、标准、强势三层分类框架。针对超龄劳动者、新业态从业者面临的“保障失衡”“身份模糊”等制度困境,提出“统一底线、分层配置”路径:以不可克减的劳动基准为统一底线,结合不同层级劳动者特性差异化配置权益。文章主张将分层保护逻辑融入劳动法典编纂,实现底层劳动者精准保障与高层劳动者适度赋权,在坚守底线公平的同时,回应劳动力市场结构性变迁的挑战。
Abstract: The development of the digital economy and diverse forms of employment has rendered the traditional labor law’s assumption that workers are homogeneous “abstractly vulnerable” individuals increasingly incompatible with reality, as significant stratification has emerged within the workforce. Grounded in the principle of substantive justice, this paper explores a paradigm shift from “uniform protection” to “tiered and categorized protection”. By analyzing differences in workers’ attributes, bargaining power, and degree of dependency on employment, it constructs a three-tier classification framework comprising vulnerable, standard, and strong categories. Addressing institutional challenges such as “protection imbalances” and “ambiguous status” faced by older workers and those in new business models, the paper proposes a “unified baseline, tiered allocation” approach: establishing non-derogable labor standards as a unified baseline, while allocating rights and benefits in a differentiated manner based on the characteristics of workers at different tiers. The article advocates incorporating the logic of tiered protection into the codification of labor law to achieve precise protection for low-tier workers and appropriate empowerment for high-tier workers, thereby upholding baseline fairness while responding to the challenges posed by structural shifts in the labor market.
文章引用:林圣宇. 劳动者分层保护视域下的就业保障制度研究[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(5): 80-86. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.145135

参考文献

[1] 王全兴, 粟瑜. 我国《劳动法》颁布三十年的回顾与思考——以劳动法体系化为视角[J]. 财经法学, 2024(6): 23-42.
[2] 王全兴. 《民法典》背景下劳动法与民法的关系[J]. 中国法学, 2023(3): 25-45.
[3] 余飞跃. 社会保障的适度性[J]. 中国社会保障, 2021(3): 48-49.
[4] 马克斯∙韦伯. 经济与社会[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2010.
[5] 张艳. 超龄劳动者劳动权益保护法律适用研究[J]. 中国应用法学, 2024(3): 133-143.
[6] 娄宇, 彭思元. 平台用工中算法的法律规制与新就业形态劳动者的权益保障——基于“不完全劳动关系”理论[J]. 中国劳动关系学院学报, 2025, 39(5): 48-59.
[7] 中国政府网. 全国新就业形态劳动者达8400万人[EB/OL]. 2023-03-27.
http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2023-03/27/content_5748417.htm, 2026-02-28.
[8] 新华网. 三项社保基金累计结余10.2万亿元[EB/OL]. 2026-01-27.
https://www.xinhuanet.com/fortune/20260127/1c01bddb29b2435bbf9dafff5833e8eb/c.html, 2026-02-28.
[9] 余飞跃. 新业态从业人员职业伤害归责研究——基于汉德公式分析框架[J]. 社会保障评论, 2022, 6(3): 81-97.
[10] 王天玉. 劳动关系认定标准的法理[J]. 中国应用法学, 2025(2): 40-50.
[11] 黎婉婧, 章群. 平台用工治理: 以劳动法与算法规制双重维度展开[J]. 社会科学研究, 2026(2): 62-71.