工业机器人夹爪失效检测中深度学习与传统机器学习方法的对比研究
Deep Learning Versus Traditional Machine Learning for Grip-Loss Detection in Industrial Robots: A Systematic Comparative Study
DOI: 10.12677/airr.2026.153075, PDF,   
作者: 熊忠帅*, 唐 成, 智昆彭:湖南科技大学机电工程学院,湖南 湘潭;周鹏庆:中国地质大学材料和化学学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 夹爪失效检测机器人关节传感器不平衡分类K近邻算法机器学习对比Grip-Loss Detection Robot Joint Sensors Imbalanced Classification K-Nearest Neighbors Machine Learning Comparison
摘要: 工业机器人夹爪失效可能导致严重的生产事故与经济损失,对其进行实时准确检测具有重要工程价值。本文基于包含7355条传感器记录、正负样本比约为29比1的高度失衡机器人关节数据集,系统比较了三种传统机器学习方法,即决策树、支持向量机和K近邻算法,与四种深度学习及特征增强方法,即前馈神经网络、一维卷积神经网络、长短期记忆网络和注意力神经网络,在夹爪失效二分类任务上的性能表现。评估指标涵盖平衡准确率、精确率、召回率、F1分数及曲线下面积,并结合五折交叉验证、学习曲线分析和实际计算耗时进行全面考察。实验结果表明,K近邻算法的平衡准确率达0.8604,综合效率评分为0.8000,训练时间仅0.01秒,均优于其他方法,展现出在工业在线检测场景中的显著优势。本研究为工程师在实际部署中选择合适检测算法提供了量化依据和可复现的评估框架。
Abstract: Grip-loss events in industrial robots can trigger severe production accidents and economic losses, making their real-time detection a problem of considerable engineering relevance. This paper presents a systematic comparison of three traditional machine learning methods, namely Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, and K-Nearest Neighbors, against four deep learning and feature-augmentation approaches, namely Feedforward Neural Network, 1D-Convolutional Neural Network, Long Short-Term Memory Network, and Attention-based Neural Network, on a grip-loss binary classification task. The dataset comprises 7355 real sensor records collected from a six-joint industrial robot, with a severe class imbalance ratio of approximately 29:1 between normal and grip-loss samples. To address this imbalance, cost-sensitive matrices, sample weighting, and minority-class oversampling are applied consistently across methods. All seven approaches are evaluated under a unified framework using balanced accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the ROC curve, supplemented by five-fold cross-validation, learning curve analysis, and measured training and inference times. Experimental results show that K-Nearest Neighbors achieves the highest balanced accuracy of 0.8604, an overall recommendation score of 0.8000, and a training time of only 0.01 seconds, outperforming all other methods on every primary criterion. The findings demonstrate that lightweight instance-based methods can match or surpass more complex deep learning approximations on structured, low-dimensional sensor data with extreme class imbalance, and that high AUC does not guarantee practical utility at a fixed decision threshold. Feature importance analysis consistently identifies Current_J2 as the most discriminative signal for grip-loss detection. The proposed evaluation framework is directly transferable to other highly imbalanced industrial fault detection tasks.
文章引用:熊忠帅, 周鹏庆, 唐成, 智昆彭. 工业机器人夹爪失效检测中深度学习与传统机器学习方法的对比研究[J]. 人工智能与机器人研究, 2026, 15(3): 802-815. https://doi.org/10.12677/airr.2026.153075

参考文献

[1] 吴昊天, 王耀南, 朴玄斌, 等. 智能制造工业机器人技术应用及发展趋势[J]. 中国工程科学, 2025, 27(3): 83.
[2] Soori, M., Dastres, R., Arezoo, B. and Karimi Ghaleh Jough, F. (2024) Intelligent Robotic Systems in Industry 4.0: A Review. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology, 4, Article ID: 2024007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Vrochidou, E., Tsakalidou, V.N., Kalathas, I., Gkrimpizis, T., Pachidis, T. and Kaburlasos, V.G. (2022) An Overview of End Effectors in Agricultural Robotic Harvesting Systems. Agriculture, 12, Article No. 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Wolf, A., Steinmann, R. and Schunk, H. (2005) Grippers in Motion: The Fascination of Automated Handling Tasks. Springer.
[5] Liu, S. (2025) Machine Learning-Based Fault Detection for UR3 Collaborative Robot: A Multimodal Data Analysis Approach. Engineering Frontiers, 1, 42-54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] He, Y., Zhao, C., Zhou, X. and Shen, W. (2024) MJAR: A Novel Joint Generalization-Based Diagnosis Method for Industrial Robots with Compound Faults. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 86, Article ID: 102668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 郁明, 李旺林, 蓝盾. 基于优化自适应阈值的非线性机电系统传感器故障检测和主动容错控制[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2022, 43(4): 26-37.
[8] Otter, D.W., Medina, J.R. and Kalita, J.K. (2021) A Survey of the Usages of Deep Learning for Natural Language Processing. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32, 604-624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Young, T., Hazarika, D., Poria, S. and Cambria, E. (2018) Recent Trends in Deep Learning Based Natural Language Processing. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 13, 55-75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Chen, W., Shao, Y., Xu, Z., Zhou, B., Cui, S., Dai, Z., et al. (2026) Ensemble Machine Learning for Operational Water Quality Monitoring Using Weighted Model Fusion for pH Forecasting. Sustainability, 18, Article No. 1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Wang, C., Huang, K., Yao, Y., Chen, J., Shuai, H. and Cheng, W. (2024) Lightweight Deep Learning: An Overview. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 13, 51-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Chen, C., Zhang, P., Zhang, H., Dai, J., Yi, Y., Zhang, H., et al. (2020) Deep Learning on Computational-Resource-Limited Platforms: A Survey. Mobile Information Systems, 2020, Article ID: 8454327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Johnson, J.M. and Khoshgoftaar, T.M. (2019) Survey on Deep Learning with Class Imbalance. Journal of Big Data, 6, Article No. 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Chakraborty, S., Tomsett, R., Raghavendra, R., Harborne, D., Alzantot, M., Cerutti, F., et al. (2017) Interpretability of Deep Learning Models: A Survey of Results. 2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI), San Francisco, 4-8 August 2017, 1-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Tyrovolas, M., Stylios, C., Aliev, K. and Antonelli, D. (2024) Leveraging Information Flow-Based Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for Interpretable Fault Diagnosis in Industrial Robotics. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M. and Ferrada, F., Eds., Technological Innovation for Human-Centric Systems, Springer, 98-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 陈海涵, 吴国栋, 李景霞, 等. 基于注意力机制的深度学习推荐研究进展[J]. 计算机工程与科学, 2021, 43(2): 370.
[17] 谢丽霞, 刘思雨, 杨宏宇, 等. 一种基于分类代价的软件缺陷评估方法[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2023, 46(4): 116.
[18] 周璇, 闫学成, 闫军威, 等. 基于BOA-SVM的冷源系统温度传感器偏差故障检测[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2025, 42(5): 921-930.
[19] 齐超群, 彭思淇, 张慧博, 等. 基于阵列压力传感器的嵌套式递推分布力辨识[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2025, 46(1): 1-10.
[20] 王军锋, 张彪, 张昊, 等. KNN-Transformer: 基于K近邻分类的Transformer算法在滚动轴承故障诊断中的应用[J]. 机电工程技术, 2025, 54(18): 160-166.
[21] 徐杨宇, 高宝元, 郭杰龙, 等. 尺度不变的条件数约束的模型鲁棒性增强算法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2024, 60(8): 140-147.