基于CT-FFR联合临床指标对疑似冠心病胸痛患者18个月MACE的预测价值研究
Predictive Value of CT‑FFR Combined with Clinical Indicators for 18‑Month MACE in Patients with Chest Pain Suspected of Coronary Artery Disease
摘要: 目的:评估基于冠状动脉CT血管成像的血流储备分数(Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve, CT-FFR)对疑似冠心病胸痛患者18个月主要不良心血管事件(Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event, MACE)的预测价值,并探索其与临床指标联合的增量效能。方法:连续纳入196例因胸痛就诊并完成CCTA的疑似冠心病患者,根据CT-FFR值分为阳性组(≤0.80, n = 93)和阴性组(>0.80, n = 103)。收集基线临床资料、实验室指标及诊疗路径信息。主要终点为18个月MACE事件。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析、多因素Logistic回归及受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估CT-FFR的预测价值。结果:随访期间,CT-FFR阳性组MACE发生率显著高于阴性组(31.18% vs. 8.74%, P < 0.001)。多因素Logistic回归显示,CT-FFR阳性是MACE的独立预测因子(OR = 5.461, 95% CI: 2.253~13.236, P < 0.001)。单独CT-FFR预测MACE的AUC为0.679,联合年龄、BNP、血肌酐(Cr)的模型B的AUC提升至0.752 (P = 0.035)。结论:CT-FFR ≤ 0.80是疑似冠心病患者18个月MACE的强独立预测因子。联合CT-FFR与BNP、Cr等临床指标可显著提高风险分层效能。
Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT‑FFR) for 18‑month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with chest pain suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD), and to explore the incremental efficacy when combined with clinical indicators. Methods: A total of 196 consecutive patients with suspected CAD who presented with chest pain and underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) were enrolled. They were divided into a positive group (CT‑FFR ≤ 0.80, n = 93) and a negative group (CT‑FFR > 0.80, n = 103) based on CT‑FFR values. Baseline clinical data, laboratory indicators, and diagnostic/therapeutic pathways were collected. The primary endpoint was MACE at 18 months. Kaplan‑Meier survival analysis, multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the predictive value of CT‑FFR. Results: During follow‑up, the MACE rate in the CT‑FFR positive group was significantly higher than that in the negative group (31.18% vs. 8.74%, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that positive CT‑FFR was an independent predictor of MACE (OR = 5.461, 95% CI: 2.253~13.236, P < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for CT‑FFR alone in predicting MACE was 0.679, while the AUC of Model B, which combined CT‑FFR with age, BNP, and serum creatinine (Cr), increased to 0.752 (P = 0.035). Conclusion: CT‑FFR ≤ 0.80 is a strong independent predictor of 18‑month MACE in patients with suspected CAD. Combining CT‑FFR with clinical indicators such as BNP and Cr significantly improves risk stratification performance.
文章引用:张燕, 梁有峰. 基于CT-FFR联合临床指标对疑似冠心病胸痛患者18个月MACE的预测价值研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(5): 1301-1309. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1651931

参考文献

[1] Nørgaard, B.L., Leipsic, J., Gaur, S., Seneviratne, S., Ko, B.S., Ito, H., et al. (2014) Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The NXT Trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 63, 1145-1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Koo, B., Erglis, A., Doh, J., Daniels, D.V., Jegere, S., Kim, H., et al. (2011) Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Computed from Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms: Results from the Prospective Multicenter DISCOV-ER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, 1989-1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Tonino, P.A.L., De Bruyne, B., Pijls, N.H.J., Siebert, U., Ikeno, F., van’t Veer, M., et al. (2009) Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 213-224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Fairbairn, T.A., Nieman, K., Akasaka, T., Nørgaard, B.L., Berman, D.S., Raff, G., et al. (2018) Real-World Clinical Utility and Impact on Clinical Decision-Making of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Lessons from the ADVANCE Registry. European Heart Journal, 39, 3701-3711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Patel, M.R., Nørgaard, B.L., Fairbairn, T.A., et al. (2020) 1-Year Impact on Medical Practice and Clinical Outcomes of FFRCT: The ADVANCE Registry. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 13, 97-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Lu, M.T., Ferencik, M., Roberts, R.S., Lee, K.L., Ivanov, A., Adami, E., et al. (2017) Noninvasive FFR Derived from Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 10, 1350-1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Guo, B., Jiang, M., Guo, X., Tang, C., Zhong, J., Lu, M., et al. (2024) Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Fully-Automated On-Site CT-FFR in Patients with Cad. Science Bulletin, 69, 1472-1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会. 冠状动脉CT血流储备分数应用临床路径中国专家共识[J]. 中国介入心脏病学杂志, 2023, 31(4): 241-251.
[9] Li, Z., Xu, T., Wang, Z., et al. (2025) Prognostic Significance of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Long-Term Outcomes in Individuals with Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American Heart Association, 14, e037988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Alabdullah, A.A., Marey, A., Li, Y., Jha, S., Rogers, C., Abdulla, J., et al. (2026) Clinical Value and Cost Effectiveness of FFR-CT in Guiding Revascularization and Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events: A Meta-Analysis. Clinical Imaging, 129, Article ID: 110659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Johnson, N.P. and Gould, K.L. (2017) Physiological Basis for Angina and ST-Segment Change: Coronary Physiology and Molecular Mechanisms. Circulation, 136, 299-314.
[12] Patel, M.R., Peterson, E.D., Dai, D., Brennan, J.M., Redberg, R.F., Anderson, H.V., et al. (2010) Low Diagnostic Yield of Elective Coronary Angiography. New England Journal of Medicine, 362, 886-895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 周帆, 张闰秋, 郭翔, 等. 冠状动脉钙化积分与CT血流储备分数对稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者的预后评估[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2024, 104(22): 2051-2058.
[14] Motoyama, S., Ito, H., Sarai, M., Kondo, T., Kawai, H., Nagahara, Y., et al. (2015) Plaque Characterization by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and the Likelihood of Acute Coronary Events in Mid-Term Follow-up. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 66, 337-346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Hamaya, R., Yonetsu, T., Kanaji, Y., Usui, E., Hoshino, M., Hada, M., et al. (2019) Interrelationship in the Prognostic Efficacy of Regional Coronary Flow Reserve, Fractional Flow Reserve, High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin-I and NT-proBNP in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Heart and Vessels, 34, 410-418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 李冰, 黄桂锋, 陈泽海. FFR联合HbA1c、BNP水平对冠心病患者冠脉病变严重程度及预后的预测价值[J]. 广州医科大学学报, 2023, 51(4): 22-27.
[17] Palazzuoli, A., Maisel, A., Caputo, M., et al. (2011) B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels Predict Extent and Severity of Coronary Disease in Non-ST Elevation Coronary Syndromes and Normal Left Ventricular Systolic Function. Regulatory Peptides, 167, 129-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Ronco, C., Bellasi, A. and Di Lullo, L. (2018) Cardiorenal Syndrome: An Overview. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease, 25, 382-390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Zhang, R., Fu, W., Xu, J., He, H., Guan, X., You, Y., et al. (2025) Combined Prognostic Value of AI-Derived CT-FFR and High-Risk Plaque Characteristics in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 12, Article 1674126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 郭杨, 吴方锦, 高丽珊, 等. 基于人工智能平台的CT冠状动脉血流储备分数联合机器学习算法诊断MACE[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2026, 24(2): 80-83.
[21] Henderson, J., Sinha, A., Bularga, A., et al. (2025) 14 the Impact of Non-Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve (CTFFR) on Clinical Decision-Making and Cost Savings in the Investigation of Coronary Artery Disease: A 15-Month Audit at Borders General Hospital. Heart, 111, A5.
https://heart.bmj.com/content/111/Suppl_1/A5.2