基于水热协同效应的牛粪高效生物干化工艺及参数探究
Investigation of High-Efficiency Bio-Drying Process and Parameters for Cow Dung Based on Hydrothermal Synergistic Effect
DOI: 10.12677/aep.2026.165076, PDF,   
作者: 吴佩佩, 李爱民*:大连理工大学环境学院,辽宁 大连
关键词: 牛粪生物干化有机物降解含水率Cow Dung Bio-Drying Organic Matter Degradation Moisture Content
摘要: 牛粪的高含水率限制了其资源化利用,因此,需要发展低碳节能的脱水预处理。其中,生物干化虽具潜力,但效率却受限于牛粪有机物的难降解特性。为强化牛粪生物干化的脱水效果,研究通过单因素实验,系统探究了回用接种比例、初始含水率、通风量及翻堆频率对干化进程的调控作用。结果表明,工艺参数的优化能显著提升干化效能。在初始含水率60%、通风量0.3 L·min1、翻堆频率2 d/次的条件下,回用接种比例为1:3时牛粪含水率下降最快,反应周期可缩短至8 d,水分去除率达84.96%。研究为牛粪生物干化工程的实际应用奠定了基础。
Abstract: The high moisture content of cow dung restricts its resource utilization. Therefore, low-carbon and energy-efficient dewatering pretreatment is needed. Bio-drying has potential. However, its efficiency is constrained by the low biodegradability of organic matter in cow dung. To enhance the dewatering performance of cattle manure bio-drying, this study systematically investigated the regulatory effects of inoculum recycling ratio, initial moisture content, aeration rate, and turning frequency on the drying process through single-factor experiments. The results showed that coordinated optimization of process parameters significantly improved drying performance. Under 60% initial moisture, an aeration rate of 0.3 L·min1, and turning every 2 days, the inoculation ratio of 1:3 achieved the fastest moisture reduction. The drying period was shortened to 8 days, and the water removal rate reached 84.36%. This study provides a practical basis for the engineering application of cow dung bio-drying.
文章引用:吴佩佩, 李爱民. 基于水热协同效应的牛粪高效生物干化工艺及参数探究[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2026, 16(5): 764-777. https://doi.org/10.12677/aep.2026.165076

参考文献

[1] 邵聪. 生物炭联合铁氧化物应用于牛粪好氧堆肥效果分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西北农林科技大学, 2025.
[2] 屈璐璐, 刘芳, 贾海凤, 王超. 我国牛粪污资源化利用研究进展[J]. 现代畜牧兽医, 2025(1): 80-84.
[3] Tufaner, F. and Avşar, Y. (2016) Effects of Co-Substrate on Biogas Production from Cattle Manure: A Review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13, 2303-2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Font-Palma, C. (2019) Methods for the Treatment of Cattle Manure—A Review. C, 5, Article No. 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Khoshnevisan, B., Duan, N., Tsapekos, P., Awasthi, M.K., Liu, Z., Mohammadi, A., et al. (2021) A Critical Review on Livestock Manure Biorefinery Technologies: Sustainability, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, Article ID: 110033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Bao, Y., Fu, Y., Wang, C. and Wang, H. (2021) An Effective Integrated System Used in Separating for Anaerobic Digestate and Concentrating for Biogas Slurry. Environmental Technology, 42, 4434-4443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Ma, J., Zhang, L. and Li, A. (2016) Energy-Efficient Co-Biodrying of Dewatered Sludge and Food Waste: Synergistic Enhancement and Variables Investigation. Waste Management, 56, 411-422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Mathioudakis, V.L., Kapagiannidis, A.G., Athanasoulia, E., Paltzoglou, A.D., Melidis, P. and Aivasidis, A. (2013) Sewage Sludge Solar Drying: Experiences from the First Pilot-Scale Application in Greece. Drying Technology, 31, 519-526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 周亚文. 易腐生活垃圾生物干化研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北科技大学, 2021.
[10] Zhao, L., Gu, W., He, P. and Shao, L. (2010) Effect of Air-Flow Rate and Turning Frequency on Bio-Drying of Dewatered Sludge. Water Research, 44, 6144-6152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Li, Y., Zhao, J., Krooneman, J. and Euverink, G.J.W. (2021) Strategies to Boost Anaerobic Digestion Performance of Cow Manure: Laboratory Achievements and Their Full-Scale Application Potential. Science of the Total Environment, 755, Article ID: 142940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Kim, E., Lee, D., Won, S. and Ahn, H. (2015) Evaluation of Optimum Moisture Content for Composting of Beef Manure and Bedding Material Mixtures Using Oxygen Uptake Measurement. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 29, 753-758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Zhang, C., Li, Y., Yu, Z., Liu, Y. and Dong, L. (2024) Effectiveness of Biological Drying for Citric Acid Dewatered Sludge: Evaluating the Impact of Energy-Efficient Ventilation Strategies. Waste Management, 182, 237-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Song, X., Ma, J., Gao, J., Liu, Y., Hao, Y., Li, W., et al. (2017) Optimization of Bio-Drying of Kitchen Waste: Inoculation, Initial Moisture Content and Bulking Agents. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 19, 496-504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Xiao, Y., Mackey, H.R., Tang, W., Lu, H. and Hao, T. (2024) Disentangling Microbial Niche Balance and Intermediates’ Trade-Offs for Anaerobic Digestion Stability and Regulation. Water Research, 261, Article ID: 122000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Zhang, S., Zhong, B., An, X., Han, Y., Xiao, X. and Zhang, Q. (2022) Effect of Moisture Content on the Evolution of Bacterial Communities and Organic Matter Degradation during Bioaugmented Biogas Residues Composting. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 39, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 张奎, 刘旭洁, 唐恺, 邓杰, 玥玥, 师雄, 魏雨泉, 李季. 油脂对餐厨废弃物生物干化除水效率的影响[J]. 环境工程, 2025, 43(5):100-107.
[18] Bellaziz, Y., Berroug, F., Ouazzani, N., Bahammou, Y., Mandi, L., Nouh, F.A., et al. (2025) Optimizing Convective Drying for Efficient Reduction of Phosphate Sludge Moisture: Experimental Investigations and Mathematical Modeling. Water-Energy Nexus, 8, 244-254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef