燃煤烟气二氧化硫控制技术研究综述
A Review of Research on Sulfur Dioxide Control Technology for Coal-Fired Flue Gas
摘要: 中国以煤为主的能源结构在保障国家能源安全的同时,也带来了严峻的二氧化硫(SO2)排放挑战。尽管“十四五”期间大气污染防治成效显著,SO2浓度降至历史低位,但燃煤总量依然庞大,且区域复合污染、移动源排放等问题凸显,使得SO2治理仍是“十五五”期间的重点任务。文章系统综述了SO2的来源、危害及我国当前的污染控制现状,并在此基础上,全面梳理了国内外烟气脱硫技术的发展历程与技术体系。重点围绕燃烧前、燃烧中和燃烧后三大脱硫路径,深入分析了干法、半干法、湿法等主流工艺的技术原理、系统构成、优缺点及适用场景。此外,特别对石灰石–石膏法、钠碱法、氨法、镁法、海水法等湿法技术进行了对比评述,并针对资源化脱硫的新趋势,详细阐述了矿浆法,尤其是面向地域矿产特色的氧化锌法脱硫工艺及其副产物处理技术。最后,展望了未来烟气脱硫技术向高效协同、节能降耗、智能控制及深度资源化方向发展的趋势,为相关领域的研究与实践提供参考。
Abstract: While China’s coal-dominated energy structure ensures national energy security, it also poses a severe challenge in terms of sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions. Although significant progress has been made in air pollution control during the 14th Five-Year Plan period, with SO2 concentrations dropping to historic lows, the total volume of coal consumption remains substantial. Furthermore, issues such as regional composite pollution and emissions from mobile sources have become increasingly prominent, making SO2 control a key priority for the 15th Five-Year Plan period. This paper provides a systematic review of the sources and hazards of SO2 as well as the current status of pollution control in China. Building on this foundation, it comprehensively examines the development history and technical frameworks of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technologies both domestically and internationally. Focusing on the three major desulfurization pathways—pre-combustion, in-combustion, and post-combustion—the article conducts an in-depth analysis of the technical principles, system configurations, advantages, disadvantages, and applicable scenarios of mainstream processes such as dry, semi-dry, and wet methods. In particular, it provides a comparative review of wet desulfurization technologies such as the limestone-gypsum process, soda-alkali process, ammonia process, magnesium process, and seawater process. Furthermore, in response to the emerging trend of resource-recovery desulfurization, the paper elaborates on the slurry method, with a special focus on the zinc oxide desulfurization process—tailored to regional mineral resources—and its byproduct treatment technologies. Finally, this paper outlines future trends in flue gas desulfurization technology toward high-efficiency synergy, energy conservation and reduced consumption, intelligent control, and advanced resource recovery, providing a reference for research and practice in related fields.
文章引用:刘恩泽, 刘洁. 燃煤烟气二氧化硫控制技术研究综述[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2026, 16(5): 785-793. https://doi.org/10.12677/aep.2026.165078

参考文献

[1] Chen, Z., Wang, H., Zhuo, J. and You, C. (2017) Enhancement of Mass Transfer between Flue Gas and Slurry in the Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Spray Tower. Energy & Fuels, 32, 703-712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Meng, L., Li, W., Wang, J., Shi, Y. and Hu, C. (2025) Research Progress on Flue Gas Desulfurization and Denitrification by Activated Carbon Method. Processes, 13, Article 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Zhou, L., Liu, Y., Luo, L., Yuan, Z., Yang, L. and Wu, H. (2019) Improving the Removal of Fine Particles by Chemical Agglomeration during the Limestone-Gypsum Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Process. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 80, 35-44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Lim, J., Cho, H. and Kim, J. (2021) Optimization of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization System Using Recycled Waste Oyster Shell as High-Grade Limestone Substitutes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, Article 128492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Li, Z.H., Xie, C.F., Lv, J., et al. (2018) Effect of Calcium Formate as an Additive on Desulfurization in Power Plants. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 67, 89-95.
[6] Wu, H., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Guo, S. and Zhong, Z. (2025) Experimental and Simulation Study of Flue Gas Desulfurization Using the Limestone-Gypsum Wet Method under an Oxygen-Enriched Combustion Atmosphere. Journal of the Energy Institute, 119, Article 101999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 陈思杨, 郑伟. 湿法脱硫系统脱硫效率低影响因素分析[J]. 东北电力技术, 2026, 47(1): 58-62.
[8] 斯特格乐图, 谢洁婷, 牛闯. FGD湿法脱硫系统设计[J]. 北华航天工业学院学报, 2024, 34(3): 11-13+31.
[9] Chen, H. and Li, W. (2017) Solubilizer Enhanced Biodesulfurization of the Simulated Diesel. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 31, 720-725.
[10] 武广龙. 电石渣-石膏湿法脱硫中亚硫酸钙氧化研究[J]. 化工环保, 2025, 45(3): 401-405.
[11] 裴德健, 华绍广, 汪大亚, 等. 采选冶过程典型固废的高附加值利用研究进展[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2022, 40(4): 128-132.
[12] Hu, L., He, S., Zhang, L. and Chen, L. (2025) Based on the Design Structure Matrix Optimization of EPC Project Schedule for Petroleum Refining Engineering. Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils, 61, 1204-1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 徐锐. 大型石灰石-石膏湿法烟气脱硫系统可靠性研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2012.
[14] 石荣桂, 刘强, 崔清洁, 等. 湿法烟气脱硫系统节能优化研究进展[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2024(5): 9-13.
[15] 张宇环, 喻革. 燃煤电厂石灰石-石膏湿式脱硫设备优化[J]. 清洗世界, 2025, 41(1): 10-12.
[16] 陆万鹏, 王雅雯, 宗绍梁. 石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫工艺影响因素分析[J]. 节能, 2024, 43(4): 61-63.
[17] Oberschelp, C., Pfister, S., Raptis, C.E. and Hellweg, S. (2019) Global Emission Hotspots of Coal Power Generation. Nature Sustainability, 2, 113-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 窦睿音, 刘学敏. 中国典型资源型地区能源消耗与经济增长动态关系研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(12): 164-170.
[19] Zhao, J.L., Wang, J.Y., Bi, R.Y., et al. (2021) General Synthesis of Multiple‐Cores@Multiple‐Shells Hollow Composites and Their Application to Lithium‐ion Batteries. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 60, 25719-25722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 谢和平, 吴立新, 郑德志. 2025年中国能源消费及煤炭需求预测[J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(7): 1949-1960.
[21] Bartholomew, T.V. and Mauter, M.S. (2021) Energy and CO2 Emissions Penalty Ranges for Geologic Carbon Storage Brine Management. Environmental Science & Technology, 55, 4305-4313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] 常治铁. SDS + SCR工艺在焦炉烟气脱硫脱硝中的应用[J]. 中国冶金, 2019, 29(10): 65-70.
[23] 闫伯骏, 邢奕, 路培, 苏伟, 姜博, 崔晓旭. 钢铁行业烧结烟气多污染物协同净化技术研究进展[J]. 工程科学学报, 2018, 40(7): 767-775.
[24] 赵宝杰. 国内焦化企业烟气脱硫脱硝技术现状分析[J]. 中国新技术新产品, 2018(5): 127-131.
[25] 赵雪, 程茜, 侯俊先. 脱硫脱硝行业技术发展综述[J]. 中国环保产业, 2018(9): 14-22.