论无独立请求权第三人的程序保障

On Procedural Safeguards for Third Parties without Independent Claims

摘要: 无独立请求权第三人的制度设计应兼具诉讼效率与程序正义，但是制度在规范设定与实践中呈现出无独立请求权第三人通知参诉的非选择性、程序权利的受限性、判决与地位的不匹配性以及救济渠道有限性的程序保障困境。为无独立请求权第三人提供充分的程序保障是实现程序正义和保护其合法权益的必然要求。因此，应当赋予无独立请求权第三人程序选择权、充实诉讼权利、完善救济途径来实现无独立请求权第三人的程序保障，实现多元价值的理性平衡。

Abstract: The institutional design for third parties without independent claims should balance litigation efficiency and procedural justice. However, the system faces procedural safeguard dilemmas in normative setting and practice, including the non-selectivity of notification for third parties without independent claims to participate in litigation, the limitation of procedural rights, the mismatch between judgments and status, and the limited nature of relief channels. Providing adequate procedural safeguards for third parties without independent claims is essential for achieving procedural justice and protecting their legitimate rights and interests. Therefore, it is necessary to grant third parties without independent claims the right to choose procedures, enrich litigation rights, and improve relief channels to achieve procedural safeguards for third parties without independent claims and achieve a rational balance of multiple values.