1-坚韧分裂图的Prism-哈密顿性
Prism-Hamiltonicity of 1-Tough Split Graphs
DOI: 10.12677/aam.2026.155222, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 李东烨, 胡晓敏*, 王 健:太原理工大学数学学院,山西 太原
关键词: 坚韧度分裂图Prism-哈密顿图Toughness Split Graph Prism-Hamiltonian
摘要: 如果对于图 G 的任意割集 SV( G ) 均有 | S |/ c( GS ) t ,则称图 G t -坚韧的,其中 c( GS ) 表示 GS 的分支数。1973年,Chvátal猜想存在常数 t 0 使得每个阶数 n3 t 0 -坚韧图都是哈密顿图,该猜想对于一般图至今仍未解决。图 G 的Prism定义为笛卡尔积 G K 2 ,如果 G K 2 是哈密顿图,则称 G 是Prism-哈密顿图。Kaiser等猜想存在常数 t 1 ,使得每个 t 1 -坚韧图都是Prism-哈密顿图,并证明了若该猜想成立,则 t 1 9/8 。Kratsch等证明了每个3/2-坚韧的分裂图都是哈密顿图,并构造了一系列坚韧度小于3/2且非哈密顿的分裂图,从而3/2是保证分裂图成为哈密顿图的最佳坚韧度下界。本文从更弱的坚韧度条件出发,研究了1-坚韧分裂图的Prism-哈密顿性,证明了Kaiser等的猜想对于1-坚韧的分裂图成立。
Abstract: A graph G is t -tough if | S |/ c( GS ) t for every cutset SV( G ) , where c( GS ) denotes the number of components of GS . In 1973, Chvátal conjectured that there exists a constant t 0 such that every t 0 -tough graph of order n3 is Hamiltonian. This conjecture remains open for general graphs. The prism of a graph G is defined as the Cartesian product G K 2 . A graph G is called prism-Hamiltonian if G K 2 is Hamiltonian. Kaiser et al. conjectured that there exists a constant t 1 such that every t 1 -tough graph is prism-Hamiltonian, and proved that if the conjecture holds, then t 1 9/8 . Kratsch et al. proved that every 3/2-tough split graph is Hamiltonian and constructed a family of non-Hamiltonian split graphs with toughness less than 3/2, showing that 3/2 is the best possible toughness lower bound for guaranteeing Hamiltonicity in split graphs. In this paper, starting from a weaker toughness condition, we study the prism-Hamiltonicity of 1-tough split graphs and prove that Kaiser’s conjecture holds for 1-tough split graphs.
文章引用:李东烨, 胡晓敏, 王健. 1-坚韧分裂图的Prism-哈密顿性[J]. 应用数学进展, 2026, 15(5): 220-227. https://doi.org/10.12677/aam.2026.155222

参考文献

[1] Chvátal, V. (1973) Tough Graphs and Hamiltonian Circuits. Discrete Mathematics, 5, 215-228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Bauer, D., Broersma, H.J. and Veldman, H.J. (2000) Not Every 2-Tough Graph Is Hamiltonian. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 99, 317-321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Bauer, D., Broersma, H. and Schmeichel, E. (2006) Toughness in Graphs—A Survey. Graphs and Combinatorics, 22, 1-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Tutte, W.T. (1956) A Theorem on Planar Graphs. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 82, 99-116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Böhme, T., Harant, J. and Tkáč, M. (1999) More than One Tough Chordal Planar Graphs Are Hamiltonian. Journal of Graph Theory, 32, 405-410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Kabela, A. and Kaiser, T. (2017) 10-Tough Chordal Graphs Are Hamiltonian. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 122, 417-427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Jung, H.A. (1978) On a Class of Posets and the Corresponding Comparability Graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 24, 125-133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Broersma, H.J., Li, B. and Zhang, S. (2016) Forbidden Subgraphs for Hamiltonicity of 1-Tough Graphs. Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory, 36, 915-929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Broersma, H., Patel, V. and Pyatkin, A. (2014) On Toughness and Hamiltonicity of ‐Free Graphs. Journal of Graph Theory, 75, 244-255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Shan, S. (2019) Hamiltonian Cycles in 3‐Tough ‐Free Graphs. Journal of Graph Theory, 94, 349-363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Ota, K. and Sanka, M. (2022) Hamiltonian Cycles in 2‐Tough ‐Free Graphs. Journal of Graph Theory, 101, 769-781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Shan, S. (2021) Hamiltonian Cycles in Tough-Free Graphs. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 28, P1.36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Gao, Y. and Shan, S. (2022) Hamiltonian Cycles in 7-Tough-Free Graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 345, Article ID: 113069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Shi, L. and Shan, S. (2022) A Note on Hamiltonian Cycles in 4-Tough-Free Graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 345, Article ID: 113081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Xu, L., Li, C. and Zhou, B. (2024) Hamiltonicity of 1-Tough-Free Graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 347, Article ID: 113755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Ota, K. and Sanka, M. (2024) Some Conditions for Hamiltonian Cycles in 1-Tough-Free Graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 347, Article ID: 113841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Ozeki, K. (2009) A Degree Sum Condition for Graphs to Be Prism Hamiltonian. Discrete Mathematics, 309, 4266-4269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Král, D. and Stacho, L. (2007) Closure for the Property of Having a Hamiltonian Prism. Journal of Graph Theory, 54, 209-220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Ellingham, M.N. and Salehi Nowbandegani, P. (2020) The Chvátal-Erdős Condition for Prism-Hamiltonicity. Discrete Mathematics, 343, Article ID: 111709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Špacapan, S. (2024) Polyhedra without Cubic Vertices Are Prism‐Hamiltonian. Journal of Graph Theory, 106, 380-406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Biebighauser, D.P. and Ellingham, M.N. (2008) Prism‐Hamiltonicity of Triangulations. Journal of Graph Theory, 57, 181-197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Kaiser, T., Ryjáček, Z., Král, D., Rosenfeld, M. and Voss, H. (2007) Hamilton Cycles in Prisms. Journal of Graph Theory, 56, 249-269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Ellingham, M.N., Nowbandegani, P.S. and Shan, S. (2020) Toughness and Prism-Hamiltonicity of p4-Free Graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 284, 201-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Kratsch, D., Lehel, J. and Müller, H. (1996) Toughness, Hamiltonicity and Split Graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 150, 231-245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Hall, P. (1935) On Representatives of Subsets. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 1, 26-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef