风险视域下成都市S社区治理韧性评价与优化路径研究

Research on the Evaluation and Optimization Path of the Governance Resilience of Community S in Chengdu from the Perspective of Risks

摘要: 当今世界处于风险社会深度演进阶段，超大城市因其要素集聚与高度流动等特性成为风险高发场域，作为城市基本单元的社区面临严峻挑战，强化社区韧性建设对风险治理与可持续发展意义重大。本研究以成都市S社区为典型案例，基于韧性治理理论构建涵盖组织、经济、社会、设施四个维度的社区韧性评价框架，综合运用层次分析法(AHP)与半结构化访谈法进行实证研究。结果显示：S社区韧性综合评分为0.6938，处于“次强”等级，基本具备常规风险应对能力，但存在协同治理网络松散、资金保障薄弱、共同体意识不强、基础设施老化等深层困境。据此，从构建多元协同治理格局、完善多元资金保障体系、强化社会纽带建设、提升硬件支撑能力四个维度提出差异化优化路径，为超大城市老旧社区韧性治理优化提供可操作的分析范式与实践参考。

Abstract: In the deeply evolving stage of the risk society, megacities have become high-risk areas due to their characteristics of factor agglomeration and high mobility. Communities, as the fundamental units of cities, face severe challenges, making the enhancement of community resilience crucial for risk governance and sustainable development. This study takes Community S in Chengdu as a typical case. Based on resilience governance theory, a community resilience evaluation framework covering four dimensions—organizational, economic, social, and physical—is constructed. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and semi-structured interviews are comprehensively employed for empirical research. The results show that Community S has a comprehensive resilience score of 0.6938, classified as “sub-strong”, indicating a basic capacity to cope with conventional risks. However, deep-seated dilemmas are identified, including loose collaborative governance networks, weak financial guarantees, insufficient community cohesion, and aging infrastructure. Accordingly, differentiated optimization pathways are proposed from four dimensions: building a multi-stakeholder collaborative governance pattern, improving diversified funding guarantee systems, strengthening social bonding, and enhancing hardware support capacity. This aims to provide an operable analytical paradigm and practical reference for optimizing resilience governance in old urban communities of megacities.