大学英语词汇显–隐性学习对比与教学启示
Explicit and Implicit Learning of College English Vocabulary: A Comparative Study and Its Pedagogical Implications
DOI: 10.12677/isl.2026.103090, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 林欣洁, 陈雯珺, 耿燕川:宁波工程学院人文与国际传播学院,浙江 宁波
关键词: 词汇教学显性学习隐性学习Vocabulary Teaching Explicit Learning Implicit Learning
摘要: 本研究探究显性学习与隐性学习策略对不同英语水平学习者词汇习得的影响,优化高校英语词汇教学策略。研究以60名非英语专业大学生为对象,依据大学英语四级成绩将学习者划分为低、中、高三个水平层级,通过分组对照实验,对比两种学习模式下的词汇习得效果差异。结果显示,显性学习与隐性学习均可显著促进学习者的词汇习得,且不同英语水平学习者均能有效受益于两类学习模式,其效果并无显著差异。基于此,本研究认为大学英语词汇教学无需固化单一范式,应结合教学目标灵活搭配显、隐性教学手段,重点优化隐性语境教学场景,落实个性化适配教学,化解传统词汇单一化教学模式的弊端。
Abstract: This study explores the effects of explicit and implicit learning strategies on vocabulary acquisition among learners at different English proficiency levels, with the aim of optimizing college English vocabulary teaching approaches. A total of 60 non-English majors were selected as participants. Based on their CET-4 scores, the learners were divided into three proficiency groups: low, intermediate and advanced. Through a controlled group experiment, this study compared the differences in vocabulary learning outcomes under the two learning modes. The results indicate that both explicit and implicit learning can significantly facilitate learners’ vocabulary acquisition. Learners at all proficiency levels benefit equally from these two approaches, with no significant difference in overall learning effectiveness. Accordingly, this study suggests that college English vocabulary teaching should not be confined to a single fixed model. Teachers are supposed to flexibly combine explicit and implicit teaching methods according to teaching objectives, prioritize the improvement of implicit contextual teaching, and implement personalized instruction. Such measures can effectively address the drawbacks of the simplistic and uniform mode adopted in conventional vocabulary teaching.
文章引用:林欣洁, 陈雯珺, 耿燕川. 大学英语词汇显–隐性学习对比与教学启示[J]. 交叉科学快报, 2026, 10(3): 756-761. https://doi.org/10.12677/isl.2026.103090

参考文献

[1] Reber, A.S. (1967) Implicit Learning of Artificial Grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Reber, A.S. (1993) Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. Oxford University Press.
[3] Khamesipour, M. (2015) The Effects of Explicit and Implicit Instruction of Vocabulary through Reading on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Development. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5, Article 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Spada, N. and Tomita, Y. (2010) Interactions between Type of Instruction and Type of Language Feature: A Meta-Analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263-308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Nation, I.S.P. (2022) Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 孙晓明. 国内外第二语言词汇习得研究综述[J]. 语言教学与研究, 2007(4): 54-62.
[7] Laufer, B. and Hulstijn, J. (2001) Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition in a Second Language: The Construct of Task-Induced Involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Tokowicz, N. (2014) Lexical Processing and Second Language Acquisition. Routledge.
[9] 张文忠, 吴旭东. 课堂环境下二语词汇能力发展的认知心理模式[J]. 现代外语, 2003(4): 373-384.
[10] Kaivanpanah, S., Akbarian, I.H. and Salimi, H. (2021) The Effect of Explicit, Implicit, and Modified-Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning and Retention. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9, 129-146.
[11] Stratton, J.M. (2023) Implicit and Explicit Instruction in the Second Language Classroom: A Study of Learner Preferences in Higher Education. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 56, 103-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Lichtman, K. (2021) What about Fluency? Implicit vs. Explicit Training Affects Artificial Mini-Language Production. Applied Linguistics, 42, 668-691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef