一流课程建设背景下《工程热力学与传热学》课程思政混合式教学路径研究
Research on the Blended Teaching Path of Curriculum Ideological and Political Education in Engineering Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer under the Background of First-Class Course Development
摘要: 在一流课程建设和课程思政全面推进的背景下,工科核心课程如何实现知识传授、能力培养与价值塑造的有机统一,是教学改革中的重要问题。以轮机工程专业《工程热力学与传热学》课程为对象,结合OBE理念和线上线下混合式教学模式,构建了“目标重构–内容融通–混合实施–多元评价–持续改进”的课程思政教学路径。通过课程目标优化、知识模块重组、案例资源建设、全过程教学组织和多元评价设计,探索课程思政在工科“硬课”中的自然融入方式。实践表明,该路径有助于增强学生对课程工程价值的理解,培养其节能环保意识、工程责任意识和职业认同感。
Abstract: Under the background of first-class course development and the comprehensive promotion of curriculum ideological and political education, achieving the integration of value shaping, knowledge imparting, and competence cultivation in core engineering courses has become an important issue in higher education teaching reform. Engineering Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer is a core foundational course for the Marine Engineering major, characterized by a strong theoretical foundation, rigorous logic, and close relevance to engineering practice. In the integration of curriculum ideological and political education, this course is likely to encounter problems such as unclear entry points, limited teaching time and space, and insufficient diversity in assessment methods. Taking Engineering Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer as an example, this study, based on the requirements of first-class course development, the OBE philosophy, and the online-offline blended teaching model, constructs a teaching path of curriculum ideological and political education featuring “goal reconstruction, content integration, blended implementation, diversified assessment, and continuous improvement”. Practical exploration is carried out in terms of course objective optimization, knowledge module integration, case resource development, teaching process design, and assessment reform. The results show that this path helps enhance student participation, improve the pertinence and effectiveness of teaching, and strengthen the educational function of the course. This study may provide a useful reference for the curriculum ideological and political reform of related engineering courses.
文章引用:朱颖颖, 陈耿, 竺新波, 许梓豪. 一流课程建设背景下《工程热力学与传热学》课程思政混合式教学路径研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(5): 1219-1224. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.165978

参考文献

[1] http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201910/t20191031_406269.html, 2026-04-12.
[2] https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-06/06/content_5517606.htm, 2026-04-12.
[3] 吴岩. 建设中国“金课” [J]. 中国大学教学, 2018(12): 4-9.
[4] 高德毅, 宗爱东. 课程思政: 有效发挥课堂育人主渠道作用的必然选择[J]. 思想理论教育导刊, 2017(1): 31-34.
[5] 石书臣. 正确把握“课程思政”与思政课程的关系[J]. 思想理论教育, 2018(11): 57-61.
[6] 徐兴华, 胡大平. 推进课程思政需要把握的几个重要问题[J]. 中国大学教学, 2021(5): 60-64.
[7] 李志义, 朱泓, 刘志军, 等. 用成果导向教育理念引导高等工程教育教学改革[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2014(2): 29-34, 70.
[8] 李志义. 成果导向的教学设计[J]. 中国大学教学, 2015(3): 32-39.
[9] 李逢庆. 混合式教学的理论基础与教学设计[J]. 现代教育技术, 2016, 26(9): 18-24.
[10] 冯晓英, 王瑞雪, 吴怡君. 国内外混合式教学研究现状述评——基于混合式教学的分析框架[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2018, 36(3): 13-24.
[11] 冯晓英, 孙雨薇, 曹洁婷. “互联网+”时代的混合式学习: 学习理论与教法学基础[J]. 中国远程教育, 2019(2): 7-16, 92.
[12] 卢春萍, 牛建会. 基于一流本科课程建设的工程热力学教学改革与探讨[J]. 科技风, 2021(4): 70-71.
[13] 贾永英, 徐颖, 王忠华, 等. 《工程热力学》课程思政改革探析[J]. 制冷与空调, 2022, 36(2): 328-331.
[14] 王义江, 冯伟, 高蓬辉, 等. 成果导向模式的传热学教学改革及实践研究[J]. 高等建筑教育, 2024, 33(4): 129-137.
[15] 周高峰, 张琦. 《工程热力学与传热学》线上线下混合式教学探究[J]. 现代教育与应用, 2024, 2(6): 154-156.
[16] The Design-Based Research Collective (2003) Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32, 5-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Wang, F. and Hannafin, M.J. (2005) Design-Based Research and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 5-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef