胃空肠裤形吻合与Billroth II (BII)式吻合在腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术中的比较研究
Comparative Study on Pants-Shaped Gastrojejunostomy versus Billroth II Anastomosis in Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
摘要: 目的:比较腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术中胃空肠裤形吻合与Billroth II (BII)式吻合的围手术期安全性与近期疗效。方法:采用回顾性队列研究,收集我院行腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术的33例患者资料,根据重建方式分为裤形吻合组(14例)与BII式吻合组(19例)。比较两组术前基线、术中指标及术后并发症。结果:两组基线资料均衡。裤形吻合组手术时间显著短于BII式吻合组[(3.17 ± 0.65) h vs. (3.86 ± 0.85) h,P = 0.018],术中出血量无显著差异[(55.0 ± 24.7) mL vs. (69.4 ± 58.1) mL, P = 0.395]。术后首次排气时间、首次流质饮食时间及术后住院天数两组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。裤形吻合组并发症发生率为21.4% (3/14),B II式吻合组为31.6% (6/19),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.686)。结论:在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术中,胃空肠裤形吻合可缩短手术时间,且不增加术中出血及术后短期并发症风险,其近期安全性与疗效与B II式吻合相当。
Abstract: Objective: This paper aims to compare the perioperative safety and short-term outcomes between pants-shaped gastrojejunostomy and Billroth II (BII) anastomosis in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 33 patients who underwent LADG with lymphadenectomy. Based on the reconstruction method, patients were divided into the pants-shaped anastomosis group (n = 14) and the BII anastomosis group (n = 19). The preoperative baseline, intraoperative indicators, and postoperative complications were compared. Results: The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The operative time in the pants-shaped group was significantly shorter than that in the BII group [(3.17 ± 0.65) h vs. (3.86 ± 0.85) h, P = 0.018]. No significant difference was found in intraoperative blood loss [(55.0 ± 24.7) mL vs. (69.4 ± 58.1) mL, P = 0.395]. There were no significant differences in the time to first flatus, time to first liquid diet, or postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05). The complication rates were 21.4% (3/14) in the pants-shaped group and 31.6% (6/19) in the BII group, with no statistical significance (P = 0.686). Conclusion: In LADG, pants-shaped gastrojejunostomy can shorten the operative time without increasing the risk of intraoperative bleeding or short-term postoperative complications. Its short-term safety and efficacy are comparable to those of the BII anastomosis.
文章引用:苏阳, 于文龙, 宁长青. 胃空肠裤形吻合与Billroth II (BII)式吻合在腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术中的比较研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(5): 1908-1914. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1651996

参考文献

[1] Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Soerjomataram, I., et al. (2024) Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 74, 229-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 牟思博, 周昌明, 郑莹. 2025年美国癌症统计数据解读及对中国癌症防治工作的借鉴意义[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(6): 523-530.
[3] Lu, L.L., Mullins, C.S., Schafmayer, C., 等. 胃肠道癌症和生活方式风险因素的近期趋势的全球评估[J]. 癌症, 2022, 41(7): 308-323.
[4] 林青雨, 戴伟钢, 李引, 吴晖, 等. 中国临床肿瘤学会胃癌诊疗指南(2025版)更新要点解读[J]. 消化肿瘤杂志(电子版), 2025, 17(3): 299-307.
[5] 中国抗癌协会胃癌专业委员会. 局部进展期胃癌围手术期治疗中国专家共识(2021版) [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2021, 24(9): 741-748.
[6] 钟情, 张志权, 颜永祺, 李亦璠, 等. 机器人辅助全胃切除术治疗局部进展期胃中上部癌的长期肿瘤学安全性: 一项基于FUGES-014研究的5年非劣效性比较[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2025, 28(8): 886-894.
[7] 鲁家驹, 吴泽晖, 汪兵, 刘刚, 等. 胃空肠裤形吻合与BillrothII(BII)式吻合腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术疗效的比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2022, 22(5): 385-391.
[8] 郭涛, 焦光辉, 林功攀. 胃空肠裤形吻合与毕I式吻合术在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术中的应用效果对比[J]. 河南医学研究, 2023, 32(15): 2805-2808.
[9] 王亮, 赵军, 汪兵, 史良会, 等. 裤形吻合与RY吻合方式在胃癌全胃切除后的应用价值比较[J]. 河北医学, 2024, 30(3): 462-469.
[10] 鲁家驹, 吴泽晖, 汪兵, 刘刚, 罗斌, 等. 腹腔镜全胃切除后裤形吻合与传统Roux-en-Y式吻合的疗效对比[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2022, 37(2): 144-146.
[11] Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2021) Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2018 (5th Edition). Gastric Cancer, 24, 1-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 闵震宇. 腹腔镜辅助Roux-en-Y吻合术与毕II式吻合术用于远端胃癌根治术中消化道重建的疗效及安全性对比[J]. 大医生, 2024, 9(17): 18-21.
[13] 杨力, 马翔. 腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术后消化道重建方式的选择与思考[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2021, 26(1): 16-19.
[14] 郭宁, 邓天伟, 胡述静. 基于腹腔镜技术的不同吻合方式用于远端胃癌根治术的近中期随访比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(3): 283-286.