基于无标签分类的波形光子计数研究
Research on Waveform Photon Counting Based on Classification Without Labels
DOI: 10.12677/csa.2026.165167, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘凯楠, 黄桂鸿*:五邑大学应用物理与材料学院,广东 江门
关键词: PMT波形无标签分类噪声鉴别光子计数PMT Waveform Classification Without Labels Noise Discrimination Photon Counting
摘要: 光电倍增管(PMT)广泛应用于粒子物理的光子探测。PMT波形重建精度直接影响探测器的空间与能量分辨性能。当多个光子在纳秒级时间窗口内相继到达时,如何有效分辨单光子成为一个关键挑战。传统波形重建方法因依赖探测器的先验知识而性能受限;监督深度学习方法虽性能上更优,但在实际应用中往往难以获取光子真值标签,制约了其推广。为此,研究提出一种基于无标签分类(CWoLa)理论的弱监督波形光子计数方法,利用两组混合样本的统计分布差异训练分类器,并设计级联二分类框架,实现无样本级真值标签的PMT波形光子计数重建。利用蒙特卡洛模拟的纯净度分别为100%和95%的波形样本对所提方法进行验证,实验结果表明,该方法的噪声鉴别准确率达99.89%,在1~3 p.e.的低光子数区间分类准确率超过89%;在1~10 p.e.的光子数区间,重建分辨率显著优于传统电荷估计方法,性能接近全监督训练下的ResNet50模型,且在训练样本轻度污染下仍保持强鲁棒性。研究为大型粒子物理实验中普遍存在的缺乏真值标签的PMT波形分析问题提供了一条新颖有效的弱监督技术路径。
Abstract: Photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) are widely used in particle physics for photon detection. The accuracy of PMT waveform reconstruction directly affects the spatial and energy resolution of detectors. A key challenge arises when multiple photons arrive within a nanosecond-scale time window, making it difficult to resolve individual photoelectrons. Conventional waveform reconstruction methods are limited by their reliance on prior knowledge of the detector, and although supervised deep learning methods achieve superior performance, their practical application is hindered by the difficulty of obtaining ground-truth photon information in real data. To address this issue, this paper proposes a weakly supervised waveform photon counting method based on the Classification Without Labels (CWoLa) theory. The method trains a classifier using only the statistical distribution difference between two mixed samples and designs a cascaded binary classification framework, enabling photon counting reconstruction of PMT waveforms without sample-level ground-truth labels. Validation using waveform samples with purities of 100% and 95% generated by Monte Carlo simulations shows that the proposed method achieves a noise discrimination accuracy of 99.89%, maintains a classification accuracy above 89% in the low photon count region (1~3 p.e.), and significantly outperforms traditional charge estimation methods in terms of reconstruction resolution across the photon count range of 1~10 p.e., with performance approaching that of the fully supervised ResNet50 model while maintaining strong robustness under mild training sample contamination. This study provides a novel and effective weakly supervised technical pathway for PMT waveform analysis in large-scale particle physics experiments where ground-truth labels are unavailable.
文章引用:刘凯楠, 黄桂鸿. 基于无标签分类的波形光子计数研究[J]. 计算机科学与应用, 2026, 16(5): 79-94. https://doi.org/10.12677/csa.2026.165167

参考文献

[1] Daya Bay Collaboration (2023) Precision Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation at Kilometer-Scale Baselines by Daya Bay. Physical Review Letters, 130, Article 161802.
[2] Abe, K., Akhlaq, N., Akutsu, R., et al. (2023) Measurements of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters from the T2K Experiment Using 3.6×1021 Protons on Target. European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields, 83, Article 782.
[3] Acero, M.A., Adamson, P., Aliaga, L., et al. (2022) Improved Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters by the NOvA Experiment. Physical Review D, 106, Article 032004.
[4] Adriani, O., Aiello, S., Albert, A., et al. (2025) Ultrahigh-Energy Event KM3-230213A within the Global Neutrino Landscape. Physical Review X, 15, Article 031016.
[5] IceCube Collaboration (2013) Evidence for High-Energy Extraterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube Detector. Science, 342, Article 1242856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] An, F.P., An, G.P., An, Q., et al. (2016) Neutrino Physics with JUNO. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 43, Article 030401.
[7] Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration, Abe, K., Aihara, H., et al. (2018) Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.04163
[8] Aiello, S., Albert, A., Alves Garre, S., et al. (2022) Determining the Neutrino Mass Ordering and Oscillation Parameters with KM3NeT/ORCA. The European Physical Journal C, 82, Article No. 26.
[9] Peterson, J.H. (2021) Developments in Waveform Unfolding of PMT Signals in Future IceCube Extensions. Journal of Instrumentation, 16, C09032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Wang, Y., Zhang, A., Wu, Y., Xu, B., Liu, X., Chen, J., et al. (2026) The Fast Stochastic Matching Pursuit for Neutrino and Dark Matter Experiments. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 1082, Article 170986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Daya Bay Collaboration (2019) A High Precision Calibration of the Nonlinear Energy Response at DayaBay. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A, 940, 230-242.
[12] Tang, J., Xiao, T., Tang, X. and Huang, Y. (2025) Investigation and Optimization of the Deconvolution Method for PMT Waveform Reconstruction. Journal of Instrumentation, 20, P03019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Jiang, W., Huang, G., Liu, Z., Luo, W., Wen, L. and Luo, J. (2025) Machine-Learning Based Photon Counting for PMT Waveforms and Its Application to the Improvement of the Energy Resolution in Large Liquid Scintillator Detectors. The European Physical Journal C, 85, Article No. 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Metodiev, E.M., Nachman, B. and Thaler, J. (2017) Classification without Labels: Learning from Mixed Samples in High Energy Physics. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017, Article No. 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Beretta, M., Houria, F., Ferraro, F., Basilico, D., Brigatti, A., Caccianiga, B., et al. (2025) Fluorescence Emission of the JUNO Liquid Scintillator. Journal of Instrumentation, 20, P05009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. and Sun, J. (2016) Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, 27-30 June 2016, 770-778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef