“因发知受”的层级认知逻辑与模型建构
Hierarchical Cognitive Logic and Model Construction of “Speculating Pathogenesis by Symptoms and Signs”
摘要: “因发知受”是中医诊断的核心思维方法,但现有研究多侧重推理类型归纳,尚缺乏对认知结构的统一刻画及边界反思。围绕“因发知受”能否被构建为一个可解释的认知模型及其适用范围何在的问题,通过结合中医基础理论中“取象比类”“司外揣内”“审证求因”等思维和认知科学,构建“因发知受”的层级认知模型,形成一个“生成–筛选”的认知系统:类比推理构造可能的病因空间,溯因推理生成诊断假说,最佳说明推理(IBE)完成假说筛选,三者完成取象、反推、择优的认知进路。通过与双过程理论、贝叶斯诊断模型、人工智能诊断推理等现有模型的比较,本模型在知识开放性、筛选多维性等方面形成了差异化贡献。但该模型推理过程中可能存在类比偏差、溯因偏差、IBE偏差三类认知局限。理解这一认知模型有助于规范辨证思维,提高临床诊断的准确性与可解释性。
Abstract: “Speculating Pathogenesis by Symptoms and Signs” is a core diagnostic approach in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), but the existing research focuses on the induction of reasoning types, and there is still a lack of unified description and boundary reflection of cognitive structure. Addressing the questions of whether “Speculating Pathogenesis by Symptoms and Signs” can be constructed as an interpretable cognitive model and what its scope of application is, this study integrates cognitive sciences—including concepts from TCM’s foundational theories such as “taking analogies and making comparisons,” “observing the external to infer the internal,” and “ examining symptoms to identify causes,” along with cognitive science, we construct a hierarchical cognitive model of “Speculating Pathogenesis by Symptoms and Signs”, forming a “generation-screening” cognitive system: analogical reasoning constructs a space of possible etiologies, abducive reasoning generates diagnostic hypotheses, and the best explanation (IBE) completes hypothesis screening. The three complete the cognitive approach of taking an image, reverse reasoning and selecting the best. Through comparison with existing models such as the dual-process theory, Bayesian diagnostic models, and artificial intelligence-based diagnostic reasoning, this model makes distinctive contributions in terms of knowledge openness and multidimensional screening capabilities. However, three types of cognitive limitations—analogy bias, abduction bias, and IBE bias—may exist in the model’s reasoning process. Understanding this cognitive model helps standardize dialectical thinking and improve the accuracy and interpretability of clinical diagnosis.
文章引用:应佳瑾. “因发知受”的层级认知逻辑与模型建构[J]. 中医学, 2026, 15(5): 259-265. https://doi.org/10.12677/tcm.2026.155277

参考文献

[1] 贾春华. 关于辨证求因认知进路推理模式的研究[J]. 世界中医药, 2014, 9(11): 1435-1438, 1442.
[2] Norman, G., Sherbino, J., Dore, K., Wood, T., Young, M., Gaissmaier, W., et al. (2014) The Etiology of Diagnostic Errors: A Controlled Trial of System 1 versus System 2 Reasoning. Academic Medicine, 89, 277-284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Perlin, M.W. and Accilien, Y. (2024) Bayesian Intelligence for Medical Diagnosis: A Pilot Study on Patient Disposition for Emergency Medicine Chest Pain. Diagnosis, 12, 126-130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Goh, E., Gallo, R., Hom, J., et al. (2024) Influence of a Large Language Model on Diagnostic Reasoning: A Randomized Clinical Vignette Study. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 夏淑洁, 李灿东. “因发知受”的思维原理剖析[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志, 2020, 26(10): 1421-1423, 1435.
[6] 陈谦峰, 李灿东. “因发知受”是中医诊断思维的体现[J]. 中医杂志, 2020, 61(11): 1004-1006.
[7] 郝梦, 朱彦. 从知识发现角度探析象思维内涵及路径[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2024, 39(11): 5804-5808.
[8] 江怡. 皮尔士准则、溯因推理与最佳解释[J]. 哲学分析, 2023, 14(4): 3-19, 196.
[9] 朱丽颖, 贾春华. 应用最佳说明推理方法探讨中医伏气学说[J]. 中医杂志, 2017, 58(6): 451-454, 474.
[10] 郭瑨, 赵勇. 吴又可发现疠气病因的推理过程展示[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2017, 40(6): 445-450.
[11] 郝梦, 黄玉燕, 秦培洁, 等. 从知识组织与发现视角探析取象比类内涵及应用模式[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2023, 38(2): 504-508.
[12] Peters, U., Krauss, A. and Braganza, O. (2022) Generalization Bias in Science. Cognitive Science, 46, e13188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 石勇. 中医取象比类与概念隐喻理论[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2019, 34(7): 2893-2897.
[14] 孟之舟, 刘果. 从《名医类案》误诊病案谈中医定势思维对临床的影响[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2023, 38(10): 4607-4610.
[15] Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Babyak, M.A. (2004) What You See May Not Be What You Get: A Brief, Nontechnical Introduction to Overfitting in Regression-Type Models. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 411-421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 陈科宇, 刘文科, 高泽正, 等. 论“独藏”辨识[J]. 中医杂志, 2023, 64(12): 1189-1192.
[18] Norman, G., Pelaccia, T., Wyer, P. and Sherbino, J. (2024) Dual Process Models of Clinical Reasoning: The Central Role of Knowledge in Diagnostic Expertise. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 30, 788-796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Pelaccia, T., Sherbino, J., Wyer, P. and Norman, G. (2024) Diagnostic Reasoning and Cognitive Error in Emergency Medicine: Implications for Teaching and Learning. Academic Emergency Medicine, 32, 320-326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] de Souza, M.B. and de Alencar, J.N. (2025) The Disproportionate Impact of Pre-Test Probability Estimation Errors: An Analysis across Different Pre-Test Probability Contexts. Diagnosis.
[21] Ng, I.K.S., Goh, W.G.W. and Lim, T.K. (2024) Beyond Thinking Fast and Slow: A Bayesian Intuitionist Model of Clinical Reasoning in Real-World Practice. Diagnosis, 12, 182-188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Pietarinen, A. and Stanley, D.E. (2025) The Logic of Medical Reasoning: Toward an Integrated Inductive, Deductive, and Abductive Approach to Clinical Practices. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 20, Article No. 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef