经济犯罪侦查中讯问技巧与策略研究

Research on Interrogation Techniques and Strategies in Economic Crime Investigation

摘要: 经济犯罪嫌疑人往往具备较高反侦查意识，传统审讯模式难以适应新政策下的查办需求。本文结合侦查学、心理学、社会学习理论等核心理论，在刑事诉讼法等法律框架内，系统解析了经济犯罪嫌疑人认知–情感–意志三维供述障碍、三阶段应讯心理演进规律及三类个性特征类型。在此基础上，构建了“审讯前画像构建、审讯中情感干预、供述后心理巩固”的全流程应用策略，并分析了应用中可能存在的精神强制、虚假承诺、隐私侵犯等伦理法律风险，提出了专业化团队建设、程序规范、案例指导等规范路径。研究证实，讯问策略的科学应用能在合法合规前提下突破讯问僵局，实现讯问效率与程序正义的统一，为提升经济犯罪案件查办质效、推进法治化进程提供重要理论与实践支撑，构建专业团队，在技术规范范围内灵活运用已有案例指导的方向系统化发展。

Abstract: Economic crime suspects often possess a high level of anti-investigation awareness, making traditional interrogation models inadequate to meet the case-handling requirements under new policies. Based on core theories such as criminal investigation science, psychology and social learning theory, and within the legal framework of the Criminal Procedure Law and other laws, this paper systematically analyzes the three-dimensional confession obstacles of cognition-emotion-will among economic crime suspects, the law of three-stage psychological evolution in response to interrogation, and three types of personality characteristics. On this basis, a whole-process application strategy of “portrait construction before interrogation, emotional intervention during interrogation, and psychological consolidation after confession” is constructed. The paper also analyzes the ethical and legal risks that may arise in application, such as mental coercion, false promises and privacy infringement, and proposes standardized paths including professional team building, procedural regulation and case guidance. The research confirms that the scientific application of interrogation strategies can break the interrogation deadlock on the premise of legality and compliance, realize the unification of interrogation efficiency and procedural justice, and provide important theoretical and practical support for improving the quality and efficiency of economic crime case handling and promoting the process of law-based governance. It also points out the direction of systematic development for building professional teams and flexibly applying existing case guidance within the scope of technical norms.