惠威尔将运动学说作为纯粹科学与现象科学中间环节的思想
Whewell’s Idea of the Doctrine of Motion as the Intermediate Link between Pure Science and Phenomenal Science
DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2026.155228, PDF,   
作者: 张佩玉:内蒙古师范大学科学技术史研究院,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 归纳科学纯粹科学运动学说数学应用逻辑必然性Inductive Sciences Pure Science Doctrine of Motion Application of Mathematics Logical Necessity
摘要: 19世纪,几何学成为具有普遍性和严谨性的科学典范,如何使力学或其他科学同样具备普遍性与必然性就成了一个中心问题。惠威尔认为理性与经验并重,强调概念在科学知识中的作用。运动学说与数学知识的运用,既是心智主动性的体现,也为归纳科学提供了先验框架,成为发现一般规律的逻辑前提。数学知识作为精确量化工具,确保了归纳科学与经验事实的准确联结。这一结构体现了惠威尔对基本观念(Fundamental Ideas)作为科学认知必要框架的强调:缺乏理论逻辑,科学进步将失去方向,经验法则也无法达到严谨的科学说明。运动学说连接几何学与力学,实现了从几何学必然性到物理现象概念框架的转变,提供了一种无因果假设的描述性结构。
Abstract: In the 19th century, geometry emerged as a scientific paradigm characterized by universality and rigor. A central question thus arose: how to endow mechanics and other sciences with the same universality and necessity. William Whewell advocated equal emphasis on reason and experience, underscoring the role of ideas in scientific knowledge. The doctrine of motion and the application of mathematical knowledge manifest the active agency of the mind, provide a transcendental framework for inductive sciences, and serve as the logical prerequisite for the discovery of general laws. As a precise quantitative tool, mathematical knowledge guarantees the accurate connection between inductive sciences and empirical facts. This structure reflects Whewell’s emphasis on fundamental ideas as the necessary framework for scientific cognition: without theoretical logic, scientific progress would lose direction, and empirical laws could not attain rigorous scientific explanation. By bridging geometry and mechanics, the doctrine of motion realizes the transition from the necessity of geometry to the conceptual framework of physical phenomena, offering a descriptive structure free from causal assumptions.
文章引用:张佩玉. 惠威尔将运动学说作为纯粹科学与现象科学中间环节的思想[J]. 哲学进展, 2026, 15(5): 244-250. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2026.155228

参考文献

[1] Whewell, W. (1840) The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. Parker and Strand, 79-81, 147-155.
[2] Fisch, M. and Schaffer, S. (1991) William Whewell: Philosopher of Science. Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Snyder, L.J. (2006) Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Whewell, W. (1837) History of the Inductive Sciences, Vol 2. Legare Street Press.
[5] 王广超. 惠威尔对力学第三运动定律的阐述[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2014, 36(1): 36-40, 50, 125-126.
[6] 宿智灵. 关于休厄尔《归纳科学史》编史学思想的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古师范大学, 2011.
[7] 孟德忠. 论康德在《纯粹理性批判》中对理念的先验演绎[J]. 现代外国哲学, 2025(1) :1-16.
[8] Friedman, M. (2001) Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University. CSLI Publications.