辽宁省A级旅游景区分类与空间分布特征研究
Study on Classification and Spatial Distribution Characteristics of A-Class Tourist Attractions in Liaoning Province
DOI: 10.12677/sd.2026.165190, PDF,   
作者: 李梳语:南宁师范大学地理科学与规划学院,广西 南宁
关键词: 辽宁省A级旅游景区空间分布Liaoning Province A-Level Tourist Attractions Spatial Distribution
摘要: 研究以辽宁省600个A级旅游景区为研究对象,依据其资源属性划分为城市公园、工业旅游、科教旅游、文化历史、乡村旅游、主题公园、自然景观7大类。运用最邻近指数、核密度估计、标准差椭圆及冷热点分析法,解析其空间分布特征与影响因素。结果显示:全省景区呈显著集聚态,其中自然景观与主题公园类占主导;标准差椭圆分析表明:各类景区主轴与省域轮廓和交通干线高度契合,均呈从东北至西南向延伸,自然景观类方向性最强,城市公园类最弱;冷热点分析表明:沈阳、鞍山为显著热点,辽西北为连续冷点带;大连虽因线性布局未呈统计显著热点,但凭借高等级资源仍为品质高地。研究表明,地形地貌奠定分布基底,交通通达性与人文经济活动等多要素的协同作用共同塑造了景区的空间分布形态。据此,本文可为区域旅游资源的优化配置提供理论参考。
Abstract: Taking 600 A-level tourist attractions in Liaoning Province as the research object, this study classifies them into seven categories according to their resource attributes: urban parks, industrial tourism, science and education tourism, cultural history, rural tourism, theme parks, and natural landscapes. Using the nearest neighbor index, kernel density estimation, standard deviational ellipse, and cold-hot spot analysis, this study examines their spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors. The results show that the scenic spots in the province present a significant agglomeration feature, with natural landscapes and theme parks as the dominant types. The standard deviational ellipse analysis indicates that the main extension directions of all types of scenic spots are highly consistent with the provincial contour and major transportation corridors, extending from northeast to southwest; among them, natural landscapes have the strongest directionality, while urban parks have the weakest. The cold-hot spot analysis shows that Shenyang and Anshan are statistically significant hot spots, while northwest Liaoning forms a continuous cold spot belt; although Dalian does not present a statistically significant hot spot due to its linear coastal layout, it remains a high-quality tourism center relying on its high-grade resources. This study confirms that topography provides the fundamental foundation for the spatial distribution, and the synergistic effects of transportation accessibility and socio-economic activities jointly shape the spatial pattern of scenic spots. Accordingly, this paper can provide theoretical references for the optimal allocation of regional tourism resources.
文章引用:李梳语. 辽宁省A级旅游景区分类与空间分布特征研究[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(5): 108-121. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.165190

参考文献

[1] 郭艳萍, 刘敏. 基于POI数据的山西省旅游景区分类及空间分布特征[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(7): 1246-1255.
[2] 杨慧敏, 王艺霏, 陈思旖, 等. 基于地理探测器的中国A级旅游景区空间分布格局及驱动力分析(英文) [J]. 资源与生态学报, 2025, 16(5): 1540-1553.
[3] 黄镇, 陈波, 李松林. 贵州省A级旅游景区空间分布特征及影响因素研究[J]. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 42(1): 98-107.
[4] 田晴雯. 山东省高级别景区空间分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 科技和产业, 2023, 23(19): 92-100.
[5] 黄欣, 孙佳新, 洪丽. 基于GIS技术的辽宁省A级旅游景区空间格局影响因素分析[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2025(4): 54-58.
[6] 辽宁省文化和旅游厅. 辽宁省A级旅游景区名录(截至2025年12月) [EB/OL]. 2026-01-06.
http://whly.ln.gov.cn/whly/wlzt/sjly/ajjq/2026010617062543557/index.shtml, 2026-03-24.
[7] 吴贤, 王晓东, 董孝尉, 等. 湖北省A级旅游景区分类与其空间分布的影响因素研究[J]. 首都师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 46(6): 69-78.
[8] Silverman, B.W. (2018) The Kernel Method for Univariate Data. In: Silverman, B.W., Ed., Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, Routledge, 34-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 王洪桥, 袁家冬, 孟祥君. 东北地区A级旅游景区空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(6): 895-903.
[10] 杨仲元, 卢松. 交通发展对区域旅游空间结构的影响研究——以皖南旅游区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(7): 806-814.
[11] 陈楷俊, 陈菁, 林卓宏, 等. 广东省A级旅游景区空间结构及其影响因素研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 45(10): 63-71.
[12] 徐霖娇, 邵志颖, 张梅, 等. 吉林省A级旅游景区空间分布特征[J]. 长春师范大学学报, 2022, 41(6): 100-105.
[13] 张延玉, 叶长盛, 吕雪. 江西省自然旅游景点空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 东华理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 39(2): 120-125.
[14] 王恒, 李英. 全域旅游示范区空间结构分布特征及优化研究——以辽宁省全域旅游示范区为样本的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2022(10): 208-211+215.
[15] 彭月. 成渝地区双城经济圈A级旅游景区空间可达性及其发展类型划分[J/OL]. 重庆第二师范学院学报, 1-9.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/50.1209.G4.20260303.1340.002, 2026-03-25.
[16] 胡玉蓉, 林珍铭, 樊亚明. 桂林市 3A 级及以上旅游景区的空间结构特征及可达性研究[J]. 桂林理工大学学报, 2025, 45(4): 614-625.