马克思交往异化理论视域下数字时代的交往困境与出路
Communication Dilemmas and Solutions in the Digital Age from the Perspective of Marx’s Theory of Communication Alienation
摘要: 马克思交往异化理论深刻揭示了资本主导社会中人与人的交往被物化力量所支配、交往主体被工具化的内在矛盾。数字技术从根本上改变了人类交往的空间结构、媒介形式与互动方式,在提高交往效率、扩大交往范围的同时,也催生了主体符号化、关系浅层化、媒介宰制化以及劳动数据化等新型异化问题。本文以马克思交往异化理论为分析视角,对数字时代交往异化的形成机制、现实表现与深层原因进行系统阐释,并从技术伦理构建、制度约束完善、交往主体重塑以及共同体价值回归四个方面,提出超越异化、回归本真交往的具体可操作实践路径,同时结合国内外核心研究成果明确本研究创新价值,推动数字交往从资本主导的虚假联结转向以人为核心的真实交往,最终实现人的自由全面发展与数字社会的健康运行。
Abstract: Marx’s theory of alienated communication reveals the inherent contradiction that human communi- cation is dominated by reified forces and communicative subjects are instrumentalized under the domination of capital. Digital technology has profoundly changed the spatial structure, media forms and interaction modes of human communication. While improving communication efficiency and expanding communication scope, it has also given birth to new alienation forms such as subject symbolization, superficial communication relationship, media domination and datafication of labor. Based on Marx’s theory of alienated communication, this paper systematically explains the formation mechanism, practical manifestations and deep causes of communicative alienation in the digital age. From four dimensions of technological ethics construction, institutional regulation improvement, communicative subject reshaping and community value regression, it puts forward practical paths to transcend alienation and return to authentic communication, so as to promote digital communication from capital-driven false connection to people-centered real communication, and ultimately realize the free and all-round development of human beings and the sound operation of digital society.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
马克思. 1844年经济学哲学手稿[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2018.
|
|
[2]
|
马克思, 恩格斯. 德意志意识形态[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2018.
|
|
[3]
|
韩哲. 西方社会数字交往危机的政治经济学阐释——基于马克思交往理论的资本主义考察[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2025(5): 115-122+130+159-160.
|
|
[4]
|
Srnicek, N. and Williams, A. (2015) Platform Capitalism. Polity Press.
|
|
[5]
|
Fuchs, C. (2017) Digital Labour and Karl Marx. Routledge.
|
|
[6]
|
Couldry, N. and Mejias, U.A. (2018) Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject. Television & New Media, 20, 336-349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Van Dijck, J. (2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford University Press.
|
|
[8]
|
Zuboff, S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.
|
|
[9]
|
Pasquale, F. (2015) The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
张成岗, 王明玉. 数字交往中的自我异化及其治理逻辑构建[J]. 治理研究, 2025, 41(3): 102-112+2+159-160.
|
|
[11]
|
刘英杰, 姚杨. 新质生产力背景下数字交往的发展研究[J]. 辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 53(4): 105-114.
|
|
[12]
|
郭洪水, 张淑华. 数字交往形式的异化及其应对[J]. 科学·经济·社会, 2025, 43(2): 23-33+2.
|
|
[13]
|
蓝江. 一般数据、虚体、数字资本——数字资本主义的三重逻辑[J]. 哲学研究, 2018(3): 26-33+128.
|