颈椎手术围术期静脉血栓栓塞症相关因素及 预测效能分析
Analysis of Associated Factors and Predictive Performance of Perioperative Venous Thromboembolism in Cervical Spine Surgery
摘要: 目的:探讨颈椎手术患者围术期静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的独立危险因素,并建立联合预测模型,评价其预测效能。方法:回顾性分析重庆医科大学附属永川医院1000例颈椎手术患者的临床资料。根据围术期是否发生VTE分为VTE组30例和非VTE组970例。比较两组一般资料、合并症、围术期实验室指标及手术相关指标。将单因素分析中差异有统计学意义的变量纳入多因素Logistic回归分析,以筛选围术期VTE的独立危险因素;采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价各指标及联合模型的预测效能。结果:1000例患者中,围术期发生VTE 30例,发生率为3.0%。单因素分析显示,两组在血红蛋白(Hb)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、D-二聚体(D2)、手术时间、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、谷草转氨酶(AST)及白细胞计数(WBC)方面差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,Hb升高(OR = 1.071, 95% CI: 1.040~1.103)、PT延长(OR = 1.788, 95% CI: 1.182~2.705)、D2升高(OR = 1.160, 95% CI: 1.085~1.240)及手术时间延长(OR = 1.017, 95% CI: 1.010~1.025)均为围术期VTE的独立危险因素(均P < 0.05)。由上述4项指标构建的联合模型AUC为0.857 (95% CI: 0.750~0.964),优于各单项指标。Hb最佳截断值为134.84时,阴性预测值为99.0%。结论:Hb升高、PT延长、D2升高及手术时间延长是颈椎手术患者围术期发生VTE的独立危险因素。基于上述指标建立的联合预测模型对围术期VTE具有较好的预测效能。
Abstract: Objective: To identify independent risk factors for perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) after cervical spine surgery and to develop a combined prediction model. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1000 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery at Yongchuan Hospital, Chongqing Medical University. Patients were divided into a VTE group (n = 30) and a non-VTE group (n = 970) according to the occurrence of perioperative VTE. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, perioperative laboratory parameters, and surgery-related variables were compared between the two groups. Variables significant in univariate analyses were entered into multivariable logistic regression to identify independent risk factors for perioperative VTE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the predictive performance of individual variables and the combined model. Results: Perioperative VTE occurred in 30 of 1000 patients, yielding an incidence of 3.0%. On univariate analysis, hemoglobin (Hb), prothrombin time (PT), D-dimer (D2), operative time, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and white blood cell count (WBC) differed significantly between the two groups (all P < 0.05). Multivariable Logistic regression identified higher Hb (OR = 1.071, 95% CI: 1.040~1.103), prolonged PT (OR = 1.788, 95% CI: 1.182~2.705), elevated D2 (OR = 1.160, 95% CI: 1.085~1.240), and longer operative time (OR = 1.017, 95% CI: 1.010~1.025) as independent risk factors for perioperative VTE (all P < 0.05). The model incorporating these four variables showed good discriminatory ability, with an AUC of 0.857 (95% CI: 0.750~0.964), outperforming each variable alone. At the optimal cutoff of 134.84, Hb had a negative predictive value of 99.0%. Conclusion: Higher Hb, prolonged PT, elevated D2, and longer operative time were independently associated with perioperative VTE after cervical spine surgery. A model combining these variables demonstrated good performance for identifying patients at increased perioperative VTE risk.
文章引用:崔宇轩, 张红军, 邓美超, 邵高海. 颈椎手术围术期静脉血栓栓塞症相关因素及 预测效能分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(5): 2154-2167. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1652023

参考文献

[1] 周云灿, 余可谊, 张恒岩. 脊柱外科手术后预防静脉血栓栓塞症的共识与争议[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2019, 12(2): 145-149.
[2] Patel, D., Best, S. and Ziino, C. (2024) Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Following Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. AME Medical Journal, 9, Article No. 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Bono, C., Glotzbecker, M., Harris, M., Brick, G. and Heary, R. (2008) Thromboembolic Disease in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review. Spine, 51, Article No. 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Uehara, M., Ikegami, S., Oba, H., Miyaoka, Y., Hatakenaka, T., Kurogochi, D., et al. (2024) Frequency and Associated Factors of Venous Thromboembolism in Cervical Spine Surgery. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 18, 457-461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Sebastian, A.S., Currier, B.L., Clarke, M.J., Larson, D., Huddleston, P.M. and Nassr, A. (2016) Thromboembolic Disease after Cervical Spine Surgery: A Review of 5,405 Surgical Procedures and Matched Cohort Analysis. Global Spine Journal, 6, 465-471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Ramezani, Z., Alizadeh, S.D., Khavandegar, A., Tabatabaei, M.S.H.Z., Baigi, V., Masoomi, R., et al. (2025) Efficacy of Chemical Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism after Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Asian Spine Journal, 19, 1072-1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Ellenbogen, Y., Power, R.G., Martyniuk, A., Engels, P.T., Sharma, S.V. and Kasper, E.M. (2021) Pharmacoprophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurgery, 150, e144-e154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Rahmani, R., Eaddy, S., Stegelmann, S.D., Skrobot, G. and Andreshak, T. (2024) Chemical Prophylaxis and Venous Thromboembolism Following Elective Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. North American Spine Society Journal, 17, Article ID: 100295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Solaru, S., Alluri, R.K., Wang, J.C. and Hah, R.J. (2021) Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Elective Spine Surgery. Global Spine Journal, 11, 1148-1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Wang, T., Yang, S., Huang, W., Liu, F., Wang, H. and Ding, W. (2016) Factors Predicting Venous Thromboembolism after Spine Surgery. Medicine, 95, e5776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Silvestre, J., Ferdon, R.J., Lawrence, J.P., Reitman, C.A. and Ravinsky, R.A. (2025) Increased Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Following Posterior versus Anterior Cervical Spine Fusion: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study. Global Spine Journal. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Oglesby, M., Fineberg, S.J., Patel, A.A., Pelton, M.A. and Singh, K. (2013) The Incidence and Mortality of Thromboembolic Events in Cervical Spine Surgery. Spine, 38, E521-E527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Bui, A., Lashkari, N., Formanek, B., Wang, J.C., Buser, Z. and Liu, J.C. (2021) Incidence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Venous Thromboembolic Events in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery. Clinical Spine Surgery, 34, E458-E465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Braekkan, S.K., Mathiesen, E.B., Njolstad, I., Wilsgaard, T. and Hansen, J. (2010) Hematocrit and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in a General Population. the Tromso Study. Haematologica, 95, 270-275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Folsom, A.R., Wang, W., Parikh, R., Lutsey, P.L., Beckman, J.D. and Cushman, M. (2020) Hematocrit and Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 4, 422-428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Li, H., Duo, M., Zhang, Z., Weng, H., Liu, D., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024) Blood Cell Traits and Venous Thromboembolism in East Asians: Observational and Genetic Evidence. iScience, 27, Article ID: 110671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Wang, P., Zheng, L., Yan, S., Xuan, X., Yang, Y., Qi, X., et al. (2024) Understanding the Role of Red Blood Cells in Venous Thromboembolism: A Comprehensive Review. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 367, 296-303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Jakobsen, L., Rinde, F.B., Hansen, J., Morelli, V.M. and Brækkan, S.K. (2026) Combined Effect of Hemoglobin Levels and Obesity on the Risk of Incident Venous Thromboembolism: The Tromsø Study. TH Open, 10, a28115034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Schairer, W.W., Pedtke, A.C. and Hu, S.S. (2014) Venous Thromboembolism after Spine Surgery. Spine, 39, 911-918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Sansone, J.M., del Rio, A.M. and Anderson, P.A. (2010) The Prevalence of and Specific Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolic Disease Following Elective Spine Surgery. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 92, 304-313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Schulte, L.M., O’Brien, J.R., Bean, M.C., et al. (2013) Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism after Spine Surgery: Incidence and Patient Risk Factors. The American Journal of Orthopedics, 42, 267-270.
[22] Yamasaki, K., Hoshino, M., Omori, K., Igarashi, H., Tsuruta, T., Miyakata, H., et al. (2017) Prevalence and Risk Factors of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 22, 1021-1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Inoue, H., Watanabe, H., Okami, H., Kimura, A. and Takeshita, K. (2018) The Rate of Venous Thromboembolism before and after Spine Surgery as Determined with Indirect Multidetector CT. JBJS Open Access, 3, e0015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Cox, J.B., Weaver, K.J., Neal, D.W., Jacob, R.P. and Hoh, D.J. (2014) Decreased Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism after Spine Surgery with Early Multimodal Prophylaxis. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 21, 677-684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Zeng, X. and Peng, H. (2017) Prevention of Thromboembolic Complications after Spine Surgery by the Use of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin. World Neurosurgery, 104, 856-862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Cunningham, J.E., Swamy, G. and Thomas, K.C. (2011) Does Preoperative DVT Chemoprophylaxis in Spinal Surgery Affect the Incidence of Thromboembolic Complications and Spinal Epidural Hematomas? Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 24, E31-E34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Wang, T.Y., Sakamoto, J.T., Nayar, G., Suresh, V., Loriaux, D.B., Desai, R., et al. (2015) Independent Predictors of 30-Day Perioperative Deep Vein Thrombosis in 1346 Consecutive Patients after Spine Surgery. World Neurosurgery, 84, 1605-1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Oda, T., Fuji, T., Kato, Y., Fujita, S. and Kanemitsu, N. (2000) Deep Venous Thrombosis after Posterior Spinal Surgery. Spine, 25, 2962-2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Yoshioka, K., Murakami, H., Demura, S., Kato, S., Hayashi, H., Inoue, K., et al. (2013) Comparative Study of the Prevalence of Venous Thromboembolism after Elective Spinal Surgery. Orthopedics, 36, e223-e228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Jung, B., Ngan, A., Song, J., Abbas, A., Zappia, L.C., Fallon, J., et al. (2025) Rates of Venous Thromboembolism and Mortality Have Not Improved in Elective Cervical Spine Surgery from 2012 to 2021. Clinical Spine Surgery. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]