《冲压工艺及模具设计》课程思政的系统化实施路径与教学实践
A Systematic Implementation Path and Teaching Practice for Ideological and Political Education in “Stamping Technology and Die Design”
摘要: 课程思政进入工科专业课程之后,真正的难点不在于能否加入若干思政案例,而在于价值引领能否进入专业知识的理解过程、工程问题的分析过程和技术方案的判断过程。针对《冲压工艺及模具设计》课程中存在的思政目标悬空、内容融入零散、教学方式单一、评价导向偏窄等问题,结合课程建设实践,构建了“135”课程思政育人模式,即以全方位育人体系为基础,以理想信念、职业素养和个人修养三类目标为主线,以教学目标、教学内容、教学方法、教学过程和教学评价五个环节协同改革为抓手,推动课程思政由经验式嵌入转向结构化建构。实践表明,该模式能够较好地将质量意识、安全意识、责任意识、工匠精神和创新意识融入冲压工艺分析与模具设计全过程,增强学生的专业认同、职业自觉和工程责任感,也为机械制造类课程思政建设提供了可借鉴的实施路径。
Abstract: After integrating ideological and political education into engineering professional courses, the real challenge lies not in whether several ideological and political cases can be added, but in whether value guidance can penetrate the process of understanding professional knowledge, analyzing engineering problems and judging technical solutions. Aiming at the problems existing in the course Stamping Technology and Die Design, such as disconnected ideological and political objectives, scattered content integration, single teaching methods and narrow evaluation orientation, this paper constructs the “135” ideological and political education mode based on the course construction practice. Specifically, this mode takes the all-round education system as the foundation, takes the three types of objectives of ideal and belief, professional quality and personal accomplishment as the main line, and takes the collaborative reform of five links including teaching objectives, teaching content, teaching methods, teaching process and teaching evaluation as the starting point, promoting the transformation of curriculum ideological and political education from empirical embedding to structured construction. Practice shows that this mode can effectively integrate quality awareness, safety awareness, responsibility awareness, craftsman spirit and innovation awareness into the whole process of stamping process analysis and die design, enhance students’ professional identity, professional consciousness and engineering responsibility, and also provide a referable implementation path for the ideological and political construction of mechanical manufacturing courses.
文章引用:李晓达, 占向辉, 梁建农, 刘渭博, 龚智超. 《冲压工艺及模具设计》课程思政的系统化实施路径与教学实践[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(5): 396-401. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.145357

参考文献

[1] 张晓敏, 张少云, 刘国栋. 穿石于滴水, 润物在无声——课程思政实施的关键问题及路径探索[J]. 高教学刊, 2026, 12(7): 176-180.
[2] 付志涛, 葛中玺. 课程思政元素的体系化构建与教学实践探索——以地图制图学基础课程为例[J/OL]. 云南民族大学学报(自然科学版): 1-15.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/53.1192.N.20260224.1651.012, 2026-02-25.
[3] 林惠婷, 孙浪涛, 张宏杰, 等. “纺纱学”课程思政教育的探索与实践[J]. 纺织科技进展, 2026, 48(2): 81-84, 88.
[4] 韦凯, 曲兆亮. 非力学类专业工程力学课程思政探索与实践[J]. 高教学刊, 2026, 12(5): 180-184.
[5] 胡虎, 李赫, 王云霏. 工程教育认证与课程思政双驱动的“地下水水文学”课程教学改革研究[J]. 西部素质教育, 2026, 12(4): 66-70.
[6] 裴娜, 岳丽芳, 张磊, 等. “三维融合”模式下流体力学课程思政的创新实践与成效分析[J]. 科教文汇, 2026(4): 51-54.
[7] 杨淇, 康小平, 李渝丽. 新工科与OBE背景下的汽车设计课程思政实践探究[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2026, 51(4): 91-95.
[8] 杜怡韩, 韩伟, 刘辉, 等. “土力学”课程思政建设探索与实践分析[J]. 安徽建筑, 2026, 33(2): 143-146.
[9] 孙惠玉, 顾欣妍, 郑坤, 等. 课程思政背景下城市轨道交通通信课程CDIO模式教学探索[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2026, 51(4): 100-104.
[10] 李德玉. 工程流体力学课程思政案例库构建探索[J]. 中国教育技术装备, 2026(3): 45-49.
[11] 牛木华. 基于OBE模式的工程力学课程思政教学路径探索与实践[J]. 大学, 2026(3): 88-91.
[12] 黄根信, 谭丽娟, 韦荔甫. 应用型本科汽车电子类专业电工学课程思政与评价体系改革实践[J]. 汽车维修与保养, 2026(3): 118-120.
[13] 陈东东, 尉庆国, 韩文艳, 等. 汽车底盘构造课程思政的实践与探索[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2026, 51(5): 137-143.
[14] 段梦真. 课程思政融入工业机器人技术标准化教学改革实践研究[J]. 标准生活, 2026(2): 234-236.