生成式人工智能素养导向的双轨式职业本科教学模式研究
A Study on a Dual-Track Teaching Model for Vocational Undergraduate Education Oriented by Generative AI Literacy
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1651015, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 曾 卓, 何云乾*, 龚云平, 罗 攀:重庆电子科技职业大学人工智能与大数据学院,重庆
关键词: 生成式人工智能素养职业本科自主思辨Generative AI Literacy Vocational Undergraduate Education Independent Critical Thinking
摘要: 生成式人工智能在赋能职业本科教育的同时,也带来了学生依赖增强与自主思辨弱化问题,针对现有教学中过程化不足以及素养培养目标不明确,本文以生成式人工智能素养为导向,构建了思辨先行-AI验证的双轨式教学模式。该模式围绕认知、技能、评价、反思四个素养维度,通过思辨先行实现初始问题分解,再采用AI验证实现人机交互并完善方案,然后再人机对比识别学生自主思辨的演化,最终根据过程化表达来深化教学反思。程序设计基础课上的教学实施结果表明,当引入结合人机交互的过程化表达后,学生在模块化设计与自主学习方面得到了提升,预期实现由AI依赖到自主思辨的转变。故而本文研究为生成式人工智能下的职业本科教学模式优化提供了实践依据。
Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence not only empowers vocational undergraduate education but also brings about problems of increased student dependence and weakened independent critical thinking. In response to the insufficient process in existing teaching and the unclear goals of character cultivation, this paper, oriented towards the literacy of generative artificial intelligence, has constructed a dual-track teaching model of critical thinking first-AI verification. This model focuses on four literacy dimensions: cognition, skills, evaluation, and reflection. Through critical thinking first, the initial problems are decomposed, then AI verification is adopted to achieve human-machine interaction and improve the plan, followed by comparing human and machine to identify the evolution of students’ independent critical thinking, and finally, based on the process expression, the teaching reflection is deepened. The teaching implementation results in the basic programming course show that when the process expression combining human-machine interaction is introduced, students have improved in modular design and autonomous learning. It is expected to achieve the transformation from AI dependence to independent critical thinking. Therefore, this research provides a practical basis for the optimization of vocational undergraduate teaching models under the influence of generative artificial intelligence.
文章引用:曾卓, 何云乾, 龚云平, 罗攀. 生成式人工智能素养导向的双轨式职业本科教学模式研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(5): 1489-1496. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1651015

参考文献

[1] 刘怀亚, 贾积有. 生成式人工智能促进学生高阶思维发展的内在机制和教学建议——基于IRIT模型的构建[J]. 北京教育学院学报, 2026, 40(2): 81-87.
[2] 李晶晶, 王天健. 教育应对生成式人工智能的四维倾向及其超越[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2026, 51(3): 108-119.
[3] 李焕勤. 生成式人工智能辅助计算机组成原理课程互动教学的逻辑理路与实施策略[J]. 中国教育技术装备, 2025(20): 52-54+60.
[4] 张洁, 翟海琪, 张晶. 生成式人工智能赋能编程学习的机理与路径[J]. 电化教育研究, 2026, 47(4): 64-71.
[5] 吴飞, 李艳, 陈静远, 等. 大学生人工智能素养红皮书(2024版) [J]. 科教发展研究, 2024, 4(2): 71-96.
[6] 乐承毅, 孔维伟. AIGC背景下人工智能素养的形成机理与演进路径研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2026, 70(7): 48-62.
[7] 王小姣. 人工智能视域下高职“双师型”教师智能素养提升探索[J]. 佳木斯职业学院学报, 2026, 42(3): 190-192.
[8] 马莹莹, 田宇, 万鹏. 数智化视域下大学生人工智能素养培育体系构建与实践进路创新[J]. 黑龙江教育(理论与实践), 2026(3): 1-5.
[9] Kurfiss, J.G. (1988) Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice, and Possibilities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, The George Washington University.
[10] Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete Edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
[11] Zimmerman, B.J. (1990) Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Flavell, J.H. (1979) Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Long, D. and Magerko, B. (2020) What Is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, 25-30 April 2020, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Ng, D.T.K., Leung, J.K.L., Chu, S.K.W. and Qiao, M.S. (2021) Conceptualizing AI Literacy: An Exploratory Review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 王向前. 生成式人工智能、企业技术创新与发明者协同: 基于社会学习理论视角[J]. 经济研究, 2025, 60(9): 156-176.