华中地区PM2.5时空分布特征及气象驱动因子分析
Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of PM2.5 in Central China and Analysis of Meteorological Driving Factors
DOI: 10.12677/aep.2026.165087, PDF,   
作者: 林 萌, 杜晓初*:湖北大学地理科学学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: PM2.5空间自相关驱动因素地理探测器PM2.5 Spatial Auto-Correlation Driving Factor Geographic Detector
摘要: 在我国城市化进程提速、大气污染问题愈发突出的背景下,PM2.5作为核心大气污染物,其污染防控已成为生态环境治理的关键任务。从PM2.5浓度CHAP栅格数据提取华中地区2019~2023年PM2.5年均浓度数据,利用空间自相关、普通最小二乘法回归、地理探测器等方法研究PM2.5时空分布特征及气象驱动因子特征。结果表明:1) 2019~2023年华中地区PM2.5年均浓度整体呈现“先持续下降、后小幅反弹”,总体下降的特征,月均浓度呈现出显著的周期性波动特征,峰值浓度多集中在1~2月,6~8月为全年浓度低谷,四季浓度始终保持“冬季最高、夏季最低”的特征。2) 2019~2023年华中地区PM2.5浓度存在稳定的空间自相关性。局部空间呈现出清晰的“北高南低”分异格局,河南省北部大部分地区在五年间均呈现高–高集聚区域,低–低集聚区域主要分布于湖南南部和湖北西部。3) 风速和气温对PM2.5浓度具有正向驱动作用,降水量和相对湿度对PM2.5浓度具有抑制作用,2019~2023年间气象因子对PM2.5浓度平均解释力为相对湿度(0.726) > 降水量(0.552) > 风速(0.443) > 气温(0.417)。2020年前降水量为主导驱动因子,2020年后相对湿度为主导驱动因子,其中气温和风速的交互作用对PM2.5浓度的影响最强。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of accelerated urbanization and increasingly prominent air pollution issues in China, PM2.5, as a key air pollutant, its pollution prevention and control has become a critical task in ecological and environmental governance. Based on the CHAP raster data of PM2.5 concentration, annual average PM2.5 concentration data in Central China from 2019 to 2023 were extracted. Spatial autocorrelation, ordinary least squares regression, geographic detector, and other methods were used to investigate the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of PM2.5 and its meteorological driving factors. The results show that: 1) From 2019 to 2023, the annual average PM2.5 concentration in Central China generally presented a trend of “continuous decline first, followed by a slight rebound” with an overall downward tendency. Monthly average concentration showed significant periodic fluctuations, with peak concentrations mostly concentrated in January and February, and the lowest concentrations from June to August. Seasonal concentrations consistently maintained the characteristic of “highest in winter and lowest in summer”. 2) Stable spatial autocorrelation of PM2.5 concentration existed in Central China from 2019 to 2023. Local spatial differentiation featured a clear “high in the north and low in the south” pattern. High-high (H-H) clusters were mainly distributed in most areas of northern Henan Province during the five years, while low-low (L-L) clusters were primarily located in southern Hunan and western Hubei. 3) Wind speed and air temperature exerted positive driving effects on PM2.5 concentration, whereas precipitation and relative humidity had inhibitory effects. During 2019~2023, the average explanatory power of meteorological factors on PM2.5 concentration ranked as: relative humidity (0.726) > precipitation (0.552) > wind speed (0.443) > air temperature (0.417). Precipitation was the dominant driving factor before 2020, while relative humidity took the leading role after 2020. Among interactive effects, the combination of air temperature and wind speed imposed the strongest impact on PM2.5 concentration.
文章引用:林萌, 杜晓初. 华中地区PM2.5时空分布特征及气象驱动因子分析[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2026, 16(5): 877-888. https://doi.org/10.12677/aep.2026.165087

参考文献

[1] 李琳, 赖瀚如, 凌璐羽, 等. 成都市温江区2023年环境空气质量PM2.5典型污染分析及防控建议[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2025(8): 66-69+74.
[2] 乔璐靖, 栾宜通, 曾艳丽, 等. 近20a黑龙江省PM2.5时空分布变化及驱动力分析[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(12): 6980-6992.
[3] 万好, 王琴, 余刘思, 等. 武汉市典型道旁绿地消减空气细微颗粒物的作用研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2020, 35(3): 237-242.
[4] 王相男. 天山北坡城市群PM2.5浓度时空演变格局及驱动因素分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2023.
[5] 吕昌伟. PM2.5监测及其对空气质量的影响分析[J]. 皮革制作与环保科技, 2025, 6(8): 60-62.
[6] Liu, H., Liu, J., Li, M., Gou, P. and Cheng, Y. (2022) Assessing the Evolution of PM2.5 and Related Health Impacts Resulting from Air Quality Policies in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93, Article 106727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 易文利, 田苗, 郑浩浩, 等. 陕西省PM2.5时空分布及影响因素区域差异研究[J]. 地球环境学报, 2023, 14(1): 98-109.
[8] 汤秦莉. 大气颗粒物PM2.5组分析及其对城市环境质量的影响评估[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2025, 15(22): 66-68+74.
[9] 陈丽芬. 黄河流域PM2.5浓度及其驱动因素时空变化趋势研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 银川: 北方民族大学, 2025.
[10] 谭成好, 赵天良, 崔春光, 等. 近50年华中地区霾污染的特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015, 35(8): 2272-2280.
[11] 陈哲. 华中地区耕地非粮化空间分布格局及驱动因素[J]. 中南农业科技, 2025, 46(4): 128-131+137.
[12] Wei, J. and Li, Z.Q. (2023) ChinaHighPM2.5: High-Resolution and High-Quality Ground-Level PM2.5 Dataset for China (2000-2023).
https://data.tpdc.ac.cn/en/data/6168e75d-93ab-4e4a-b7ff-33152e49d0bf/
[13] 陈优良, 李芊芊, 范琴, 等. 长三角城市群PM2.5时空异质性及驱动因素分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2025, 25(8): 3252-3264.
[14] Xue, L., Xue, C., Chen, X. and Guo, X. (2024) Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of PM2.5 and Its Driving Mechanism: Spatially Explicit Insights from Shanxi Province, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196, Article No. 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 罗进洪, 任孝宗, 王亚梅. 降水过程对大气颗粒物的清除作用研究——以山西省晋中市榆次区为例[J]. 科技和产业, 2024, 24(1): 173-177.
[16] Cheng, Y., He, K., Du, Z., Zheng, M., Duan, F. and Ma, Y. (2015) Humidity Plays an Important Role in the PM2.5 Pollution in Beijing. Environmental Pollution, 197, 68-75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]