龙马溪页岩各向异性特征及其强度准则适用性评价
Anisotropic Characteristics of the Longmaxi Shale and Evaluation of the Applicability of Strength Criteria
DOI: 10.12677/me.2026.143066, PDF,   
作者: 张远法, 杨九俸, 雷勇鸿, 黄天意, 吴 彬:重庆科技大学石油与天然气工程学院,重庆;刘 强, 尹 强:中国石油川庆钻探工程有限公司川东钻探公司,重庆
关键词: 页岩各向异性强度准则龙马溪组Shale Anisotropy Strength Criteria Longmaxi Formation
摘要: 页岩的层理结构导致其力学参数和强度呈现显著各向异性特征,准确评价该特征并优选适用的强度准则对页岩气安全高效开发至关重要。本文以我国龙马溪组页岩为研究对象,通过系统调研国内外文献,收集整理了不同层理角度(0˚~90˚)下的单轴/三轴压缩及巴西劈裂实验数据,明确了页岩抗压强度、抗拉强度、杨氏模量及泊松比的各向异性变化规律及比值范围。基于整理的实验数据,采用网格搜索法确定了SWP、WPP及ML-G等抗压强度准则和Barron、SPW、N-Z、L-P、L-A等抗拉强度准则的材料参数,并计算了不同角度下的理论强度值。通过均方根误差(RMSE)、决定系数(R2)、相对误差(MRE)及最大误差(MaxError)等多维度评价指标体系,对各强度准则的适用性进行了定量评价。结果表明:龙马溪页岩抗压强度各向异性比值范围为0.81~1.70 (横向/纵向),抗拉强度为0.81~3.10,杨氏模量为0.79~2.47,泊松比为0.84~1.72;Barron准则在抗拉强度预测中表现最优(RMSE = 0.60218, R2 = 0.92770),ML-G准则在抗压强度预测中精度最高(RMSE = 24.19507, R2 = 0.90698)。研究结果对于正确认识页岩各向异性特征和页岩气钻井井壁稳定性分析具有重要意义。
Abstract: The bedding structure of shale results in significant anisotropy in its mechanical properties and strength; accurately assessing this characteristic and selecting appropriate strength criteria are crucial for the safe and efficient development of shale gas. This study focuses on the Longmaxi Formation shale in China. Through a systematic review of domestic and international literature, experimental data from uniaxial/triaxial compression and Brazilian split tests at different bedding angles (0˚~90˚) were collected and organized. The study clarified the anisotropic variation patterns and ratio ranges of the shale’s compressive strength, tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and Poisson’s ratio. Based on the compiled experimental data, the grid search method was employed to determine the material parameters for compressive strength criteria such as SWP, WPP, and ML-G, as well as tensile strength criteria including Barron, SPW, N-Z, L-P, and L-A, and to calculate the theoretical strength values at different angles. A multi-dimensional evaluation system comprising root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), relative error (MRE), and maximum error (MaxError) was used to quantitatively assess the applicability of each strength criterion. The results indicate that the anisotropy ratios for compressive strength in Longmaxi Shale range from 0.81 to 1.70 (transverse/longitudinal), tensile strength ranges from 0.81 to 3.10, Young’s modulus ranges from 0.79 to 2.47, and Poisson’s ratio ranges from 0.84 to 1.72; The Barron criterion performed best in tensile strength prediction (RMSE = 0.60218, R2 = 0.92770), while the ML-G criterion demonstrated the highest accuracy in compressive strength prediction (RMSE = 24.19507, R2 = 0.90698). These findings are of great significance for accurately understanding the anisotropic characteristics of shale and for analyzing wellbore stability during shale gas drilling.
文章引用:张远法, 杨九俸, 雷勇鸿, 黄天意, 吴彬, 刘强, 尹强. 龙马溪页岩各向异性特征及其强度准则适用性评价[J]. 矿山工程, 2026, 14(3): 648-663. https://doi.org/10.12677/me.2026.143066

参考文献

[1] Jiang, Y., Luo, Y., Lu, Y., Qin, C. and Liu, H. (2016) Effects of Supercritical CO2 Treatment Time, Pressure, and Temperature on Microstructure of Shale. Energy, 97, 173-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Yang, F., Ning, Z. and Liu, H. (2014) Fractal Characteristics of Shales from a Shale Gas Reservoir in the Sichuan Basin, China. Fuel, 115, 378-384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 陈勉, 金衍, 张广清. 石油工程岩石力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 1-2.
[4] 卢文欣. 长宁地区页岩热演化程度对弹性各向异性的作用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2022.
[5] 曹文科, 邓金根, 蔚宝华, 等. 弹性参数各向异性对页岩井周应力的影响[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 31(5): 27-35, 42.
[6] 王倩, 王鹏, 项德贵, 等. 页岩力学参数各向异性研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(12): 62-65, 130.
[7] 徐敬宾, 杨春和, 吴文, 等. 页岩力学各向异性及其变形特征的试验研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2013, 33(4): 16-19.
[8] 杨志鹏, 何柏, 谢凌志, 等. 基于巴西劈裂试验的页岩强度与破坏模式研究[J], 岩土力学, 2015, 36(12): 3447-3455.
[9] Cho, J., Kim, H., Jeon, S. and Min, K. (2012) Deformation and Strength Anisotropy of Asan Gneiss, Boryeong Shale, and Yeoncheon Schist. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 50, 158-169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 侯振坤, 杨春和, 郭印同, 等. 单轴压缩下龙马溪组页岩各向异性特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(9): 2541-2550.
[11] 衡帅, 杨春和, 张保平, 等. 页岩各向异性特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(3): 609-616.
[12] Geng, Z., Chen, M., Jin, Y., Yang, S., Yi, Z., Fang, X., et al. (2016) Experimental Study of Brittleness Anisotropy of Shale in Triaxial Compression. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 36, 510-518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 贾利春, 孙本法, 连太炜. 富有机质页岩各向异性力学特性试验研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2017, 40(2): 20-23.
[14] Mohr, J. and Nevin, J.R. (1990) Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54, 36-51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Hoek, E., Wood, D. and Shah, S. (1992) A Modified Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion for Jointed Rock Masses. Proceedings of the International ISRM Symposium on Rock Characterization, Chester, 14-17 September 1992, 202-214.
[16] Jaeger, C. (1979) Rock Mechanics and Engineering. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Ramamurthy, T. (1993) Strength and Modulus Responses of Anisotropic Rocks. Comprehensive Rock Engineering, 1, 313-329.
[18] 马天寿, 彭念, 陈平, 等. 页岩气水平井井壁裂缝起裂力学行为研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 87-99.
[19] 张永泽, 刘俊新, 冒海军, 等. 单轴压缩下页岩力学特性的各向异性试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2015(12): 33-37.
[20] 张萍, 杨春和, 汪虎, 等. 页岩单轴压缩应力-应变特征及能量各向异性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(6): 2106-2114.
[21] 洪国斌, 陈勉, 卢运虎, 等. 川南深层页岩各向异性特征及对破裂压力的影响[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2018, 46(3): 78-85.
[22] Wu, Y., Li, X., He, J. and Zheng, B. (2016) Mechanical Properties of Longmaxi Black Organic-Rich Shale Samples from South China under Uniaxial and Triaxial Compression States. Energies, 9, Article 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Guo, Y., Li, X. and Huang, L. (2024) Effect of Height-Diameter Ratio on the Mechanical Characteristics of Shale with Different Bedding Orientations. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 16, 2482-2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Ma, T., Qiu, Y., Liu, Y. and Xiang, G.F. (2021) Evaluation of Anisotropic Strength Criteria for Longmaxi Shale Rock. 55th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, 18-25 June 2021, ARMA-2021-1054.
[25] 何柏, 谢凌志, 李凤霞, 等. 龙马溪页岩各向异性变形破坏特征及其机理研究[J]. 中国科学: 物理学力学天文学, 2017, 47(11): 107-118.
[26] 马天寿, 王浩男, 刘梦云, 等. 页岩抗张力学行为各向异性实验与理论研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 51(5): 1391-1401.
[27] 侯鹏, 高峰, 杨玉贵, 等. 考虑层理影响页岩巴西劈裂及声发射试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(6): 1603-1612.
[28] Guo, Y., Huang, L. and Li, X. (2023) Experimental Investigation of the Tensile Behavior and Acoustic Emission Characteristics of Anisotropic Shale under Geothermal Environment. Energy, 263, Article ID: 125767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Gao, X., Wang, M., Shi, X., Dai, P. and Zhang, M. (2024) Wellbore Stability Research Based on Transversely Isotropic Strength Criteria in Shale Formation. Soils and Foundations, 64, Article ID: 101541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Barron, K. (1971) Brittle Fracture Initiation in and Ultimate Failure of Rocks: Part III-Anisotropic Rocks: Experimental Results. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 8, 565-575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Jaeger, J.C. (1960) Shear Failure of Anistropic Rocks. Geological Magazine, 97, 65-72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Nova, R. and Zaninetti, A. (1990) An Investigation into the Tensile Behaviour of a Schistose Rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 27, 231-242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Lee, Y. and Pietruszczak, S. (2015) Tensile Failure Criterion for Transversely Isotropic Rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 79, 205-215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Li, L. and Aubertin, M. (2002) A Crack-Induced Stress Approach to Describe the Tensile Strength of Transversely Isotropic Rocks. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39, 1-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Fjr, E. and Nes, O.M. (2013) Strength Anisotropy of Mancos Shale. 47th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, 23-26 June 2013, ARMA-2013-519.
[36] McLamore, R. and Gray, K.E. (1967) The Mechanical Behavior of Anisotropic Sedimentary Rocks. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 89, 62-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef