房颤射频消融术后预后预测指标的研究进展
Progress in Prognostic Predictors Following Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of Recent Evidence
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1652044, PDF,   
作者: 袁伟庆:赣南医科大学第一临床医学院,江西 赣州;钟一鸣:赣南医科大学第一附属医院,心血管内科,江西 赣州
关键词: 房颤射频消融复发预测预后指标Atrial Fibrillation Radiofrequency Ablation Recurrence Prediction Prognostic Indicators
摘要: 射频导管消融(Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation, RFCA)已成为房颤(Atrial Fibrillation, AF)节律控制的重要治疗策略,但术后复发率仍维持在30%~50%。准确识别高危复发患者对于优化患者选择、制定个体化随访策略具有重要意义。近五年来,随着精准医学和人工智能技术的发展,房颤消融术后预后预测指标研究取得了显著进展。本文综述了2020~2025年间该领域的主要研究成果,将预测指标归纳为四大类:1) 临床及人口学指标,包括CHA2DS2-VASc评分、房颤类型、早期复发、消融策略及生活方式管理等;2) 影像学指标,涵盖左房结构、功能参数、心脏磁共振延迟钆强化(LGE)、左房应变及CT影像组学;3) 血清生物标志物,包括利钠肽类、炎症标志物、心肌纤维化标志物及代谢相关指标;4) 新兴技术:机器学习与人工智能模型。现有证据表明,多指标联合预测模型显著优于单一指标,而融合临床、影像及生物标志物的人工智能模型展现出最高的预测准确性。未来研究应致力于建立标准化、可解释且经过外部验证的预测体系,以实现房颤消融治疗的真正个体化。
Abstract: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has become a critical therapeutic strategy for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF), yet the postoperative recurrence rate remains at 30%~50%. Accurate identification of high-risk patients for recurrence is essential for optimizing patient selection and developing individualized follow-up strategies. Over the past five years, significant progress has been made in prognostic predictor research for AF ablation following advancements in precision medicine and artificial intelligence technologies. This review summarizes major research achievements in this field from 2020 to 2025, categorizing predictors into four major groups: 1) Clinical and demographic indicators, including CHA2DS2-VASc score, AF type, early recurrence, ablation strategy, and lifestyle management; 2) Imaging indicators, encompassing left atrial structure and functional parameters, cardiac magnetic resonance delayed gadolinium enhancement (LGE), left atrial strain, and CT imaging omics; 3) Serum biomarkers, such as natriuretic peptides, inflammatory markers, myocardial fibrosis markers, and metabolic-related indicators; 4) Emerging technologies: machine learning and artificial intelligence models. Current evidence demonstrates that multi-index combined predictive models significantly outperform single indicators, with AI models integrating clinical, imaging, and biomarker data exhibiting the highest predictive accuracy. Future research should focus on establishing standardized, interpretable, and externally validated predictive systems to achieve true individualization in AF ablation therapy.
文章引用:袁伟庆, 钟一鸣. 房颤射频消融术后预后预测指标的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(5): 2341-2349. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1652044

参考文献

[1] Chugh, S.S., Havmoeller, R., Narayanan, K., Singh, D., Rienstra, M., Benjamin, E.J., et al. (2014) Worldwide Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation: A Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation, 129, 837-847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Vempati, R., Garg, A., Shah, M., Jena, N., Raj, K., Reddy, Y.M., et al. (2025) Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: A State-of-the-Art Review. Hearts, 6, Article 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Boersma, L., Koźluk, E., Maglia, G., de Sousa, J., Grebe, O., Eckardt, L., et al. (2020) Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes with the Pulmonary Vein Ablation Catheter GOLD Duty-Cycled Phased Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter: Quality of Life and 12-Month Efficacy Results from the GOLD Atrial Fibrillation Registry. EP Europace, 22, 888-896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Zhou, Y.X., Hu, Y.G., Cao, S., et al. (2026) Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Late Recurrence and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: A Clinical Nomogram Model. International Journal of General Medicine, 19, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Dretzke, J., Chuchu, N., Agarwal, R., Herd, C., Chua, W., Fabritz, L., et al. (2020) Predicting Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation after Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Models. EP Europace, 22, 748-760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Fan, X., Li, Y., He, Q., Wang, M., Lan, X., Zhang, K., et al. (2023) Predictive Value of Machine Learning for Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 24, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Younes, H., Sohns, C., Akoum, N., Feng, H., Tsakiris, E., Hajjar, A.H.E., et al. (2024) Sex-Specific Outcomes and Left Atrial Remodeling Following Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Results from the DECAAF II Trial. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 67, 1843-1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Gabarin, M., Suleiman, M., Elias, A., et al. (2025) CHA2DS2-VASc Score as a Predictor for Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Clinical Outcomes Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 30, e70088.
[9] Wang, Z., Wu, Y., Jiang, C., He, L., Zhou, N., Sang, C., et al. (2025) Catheter Ablation vs Drug Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Nonmodifiable Recurrence Risk Factors: A Secondary Analysis of the CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Network Open, 8, e2528124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Marrouche, N.F., Wazni, O., McGann, C., Greene, T., Dean, J.M., Dagher, L., et al. (2022) Effect of MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The DECAAF II Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 327, 2296-2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] El Hajjar, A.H., Dagher, L., Younes, H., Mekhael, M., Noujaim, C., Chouman, N., et al. (2024) History of Stroke as a Predictor of High Left Atrial Fibrosis in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation—Insight from the DECAAF II Randomized Trial. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 67, 2101-2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Boyalla, V., Harling, L., Snell, A., Kralj-Hans, I., Barradas-Pires, A., Haldar, S., et al. (2022) Biomarkers as Predictors of Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation Post Ablation: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 111, 680-691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Noujaim, C., Assaf, A., Lim, C., Feng, H., Younes, H., Mekhael, M., et al. (2024) Comprehensive Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Symptom Reduction Post-Ablation: Insights from DECAAF II. Europace, 26, euae104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Hansom, S.P., Alqarawi, W., Birnie, D.H., Golian, M., Nery, P.B., Redpath, C.J., et al. (2021) High-Power, Short-Duration Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Compared with a Conventional Approach: Outcomes and Reconnection Patterns. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 32, 1219-1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Naniwadekar, A. and Dukkipati, S.R. (2021) High-Power Short-Duration Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Contemporary Review. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 44, 528-540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Romero, J., Di Biase, L., Mohanty, S., Trivedi, C., Patel, K., Parides, M., et al. (2020) Long-Term Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation in Patients with Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 13, e008390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Romero, J., Gabr, M., Patel, K., Briceno, D., Diaz, J.C., Alviz, I., et al. (2021) Efficacy and Safety of Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation during Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis. EP Europace, 23, 226-237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Verma, A., Mantovan, R., Macle, L., De Martino, G., Chen, J., Morillo, C.A., et al. (2010) Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation (STAR AF): A Randomized, Multicentre, International Trial. European Heart Journal, 31, 1344-1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Park, D.Y., An, S., Murthi, M., Kattoor, A.J., Kaur, A., Ravi, V., et al. (2022) Effect of Weight Loss on Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Ablative Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 64, 763-771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Larsen, R.T., Gottliebsen, C.R., Wood, K.A. and Risom, S.S. (2020) Lifestyle Interventions after Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19, 564-579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Yang, L. and Chung, M.K. (2023) Lifestyle Changes in Atrial Fibrillation Management and Intervention. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 34, 2163-2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Marrouche, N.F., Wilber, D., Hindricks, G., Jais, P., Akoum, N., Marchlinski, F., et al. (2014) Association of Atrial Tissue Fibrosis Identified by Delayed Enhancement MRI and Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: The DECAAF Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 311, 498-506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Bifulco, S.F., Magoon, M.J., Chahine, Y., Kim, I., Macheret, F., Akoum, N., et al. (2025) Predicting Arrhythmia Recurrence Post-Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Using Explainable Machine Learning. Communications Medicine, 5, Article No. 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Assaf, A., Mekhael, M., Noujaim, C., Chouman, N., Younes, H., Feng, H., et al. (2023) Effect of Fibrosis Regionality on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence: Insights from DECAAF II. Europace, 25, euad199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Razeghi, O., Kapoor, R., Alhusseini, M.I., Fazal, M., Tang, S., Roney, C.H., et al. (2023) Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcome Prediction with a Machine Learning Fusion Framework Incorporating Cardiac Computed Tomography. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 34, 1164-1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Nie, L., Zhang, T., Wang, W., Han, X., Liu, M., Zhang, S., et al. (2025) Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Recurrence after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 12, Article 1642409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Wang, Z., He, H., Xie, Y., Li, J., Luo, F., Sun, Z., et al. (2024) Non-Insulin-Based Insulin Resistance Indexes in Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Following Ablation: A Retrospective Study. Cardiovascular Diabetology, 23, Article No. 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Lind, L., Sundström, J., Stenemo, M., Hagström, E. and Ärnlöv, J. (2017) Discovery of New Biomarkers for Atrial Fibrillation Using a Custom-Made Proteomics Chip. Heart, 103, 377-382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Gruwez, H., Barthels, M., Dhont, S., Meekers, E., Wouters, F., Pierlet, N., et al. (2024) Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation Using an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram Algorithm. Europace, 26, euae102.67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Bai, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, C., Zhu, Z., Zhu, N. and Lv, X. (2026) Predictive Factors for Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Radiofrequency Ablation: A Multifactorial Approach. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 26, Article No. 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef