基于LSTM-Attention-GAN的潜在蒸散量预测研究
Prediction of Potential Evapotranspiration Based on LSTM-Attention-GAN
摘要: 全球月尺度潜在蒸散量(PET)预测面临驱动因素多源耦合、时序依赖复杂等挑战;同时,传统以MSE、MAE等点对点损失为主的回归方法容易出现均值收缩,进而影响预测分布对尾部波动的表达。基于1981~2020年、1˚ × 1˚统一网格数据,文章构建了“过去24个月多源气象–水文变量预测下一月PET”的序列学习框架。模型以长短期记忆网络(LSTM)为主干,引入时间注意力与特征注意力以强化关键月份与关键驱动因子的表征;进一步结合生成对抗网络(GAN),在分布层面对预测结果施加约束,以促进预测分布与观测分布的一致性。实验结果表明,引入注意力机制后RMSE显著降低且系统偏差减小;在此基础上加入对抗学习后,模型在分布形态相似性、综合一致性及高值区偏差控制方面进一步改善,整体表现更为稳健。
Abstract: The prediction of global monthly potential evapotranspiration (PET) faces challenges such as multi-source coupling of driving factors and complex time series dependence. At the same time, the traditional regression methods based on point-to-point losses such as MSE and MAE are prone to mean shrinkage, which in turn affects the expression of tail fluctuations in the prediction distribution. Based on the 1˚ × 1˚ unified grid data from 1981 to 2020, this paper constructs a sequence learning framework of “multi-source meteorological-hydrological variables in the past 24 months predict PET in the next month”. The model takes the long-term and short-term memory network (LSTM) as the backbone, and introduces time attention and feature attention to strengthen the representation of key months and key driving factors. Furthermore, the generative adversarial network (GAN) is combined to impose constraints on the prediction results at the distribution level to promote the consistency between the prediction distribution and the observation distribution. The experimental results show that the RMSE is significantly reduced, and the system deviation is reduced after the attention mechanism is introduced. On this basis, after adding adversarial learning, the model is further improved in terms of distribution similarity, comprehensive consistency, and deviation control in high-value areas, and the overall performance is more robust.
文章引用:孙国荣, 杨时雨. 基于LSTM-Attention-GAN的潜在蒸散量预测研究[J]. 计算机科学与应用, 2026, 16(5): 274-286. https://doi.org/10.12677/csa.2026.165183

参考文献

[1] Gebrechorkos, S.H., Peng, J., Dyer, E., Miralles, D.G., Vicente-Serrano, S.M., Funk, C., et al. (2023) Global High-Resolution Drought Indices for 1981-2022. Earth System Science Data, 15, 5449-5466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Noguera, I., Vicente-Serrano, S.M. and Domínguez-Castro, F. (2022) The Rise of Atmospheric Evaporative Demand Is Increasing Flash Droughts in Spain during the Warm Season. Geophysical Research Letters, 49, e2021GL097703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] He, Q.L., Xiao, J.L. and Shi, W.Y. (2022) Responses of Terrestrial Evapotranspiration to Extreme Drought: A Review. Water, 14, Article 3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Malamos, N. and Tegos, A. (2022) Advances in Evaporation and Evaporative Demand. Hydrology, 9, Article 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Singer, M.B., Asfaw, D.T., Rosolem, R., Cuthbert, M.O., Miralles, D.G., MacLeod, D., et al. (2021) Hourly Potential Evapotranspiration at 0.1˚ Resolution for the Global Land Surface from 1981-Present. Scientific Data, 8, Article No. 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Li, S., Wang, G., Zhu, C., Lu, J., Ullah, W., Hagan, D.F.T., et al. (2022) Attribution of Global Evapotranspiration Trends Based on the Budyko Framework. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 26, 3691-3707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Christian, J.I., Basara, J.B., Hunt, E.D., Otkin, J.A., Furtado, J.C., Mishra, V., et al. (2021) Global Distribution, Trends, and Drivers of Flash Drought Occurrence. Nature Communications, 12, Article No. 6330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., et al. (2019) Deep Learning and Process Understanding for Data-Driven Earth System Science. Nature, 566, 195-204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Ma, Z., Chen, D., Sun, P., Liu, Y. and Ye, L. (2025) Actual Evapotranspiration Dominated Net Primary Productivity Loss Caused by Concurrent Droughts. Ecological Indicators, 176, Article 113645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Sungmin, O. and Park, S.K. (2024) Global Ecosystem Responses to Flash Droughts Are Modulated by Background Climate and Vegetation Conditions. Communications Earth & Environment, 5, Article No. 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Le, X., Ho, H.V., Lee, G. and Jung, S. (2019) Application of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Neural Network for Flood Forecasting. Water, 11, Article 1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Hasan, I.A. and Yuce, M.I. (2024) Prediction of Potential Evapotranspiration via Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Sustainable Water Management in the Murat River Basin. Sustainability, 16, Article 11077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Roy, D.K., Sarkar, T.K., Kamar, S.S.A., Goswami, T., Muktadir, M.A., Al-Ghobari, H.M., et al. (2022) Daily Prediction and Multi-Step Forward Forecasting of Reference Evapotranspiration Using LSTM and Bi-LSTM Models. Agronomy, 12, Article 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 邢立文, 崔宁博, 董娟. 基于LSTM深度学习模型的华北地区参考作物蒸散量预测研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2019, 50(4): 64-72.
[15] 葛杰, 康秀, 白钰, 等. LSTM模型在嘉陵江流域参考作物蒸散量计算中的适用性研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2024(11): 62-70.
[16] Harris, I., Osborn, T.J., Jones, P. and Lister, D. (2020) Version 4 of the CRU TS Monthly High-Resolution Gridded Multivariate Climate Dataset. Scientific Data, 7, Article No. 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Li, Q., Zhang, C., Shangguan, W., Wei, Z., Yuan, H., Zhu, J., et al. (2024) Landbench 1.0: A Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation Metrics for Data-Driven Land Surface Variables Prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 243, Article 122917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef