西安“5·8”干旱背景下冰雹机理与服务响应
Mechanism and Service Response of Hail under Drought Background in Xi’an “5·8” Event
DOI: 10.12677/ccrl.2026.153063, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 牛亚萍*, 刘 环, 范倩莹#, 冯 蕾:陕西省气象台,陕西 西安;彭 欣:陕西省突发事件预警信息发布中心,陕西 西安
关键词: 冰雹人工增雨气象舆情Hail Artificial Precipitation Enhancement Meteorological Public Opinion
摘要: 2025年西安“5·8”冰雹发生于春季罕见干旱背景,且与全省抗旱人工增雨时空叠加,形成三重业务挑战。基于常规气象观测、雷达卫星观测、ERA5再分析及应急舆情多源数据分析,结果表明:(1) 此次冰雹是500 hPa高空槽冷平流与850 hPa西南暖湿急流交汇、地面冷锋触发,叠加适宜温层和垂直风切变的自然强对流结果;(2) 人工增雨仅补充凝结核,未改变强对流核心条件,与冰雹无直接因果关系;(3) 省级数值预报可捕捉强对流趋势,双偏振雷达可实现15~30分钟短临预警,预警精准性仍有提升空间;(4) 气象部门经应急响应、立体增雨和多平台科普,有效缓解旱情且快速消解负面舆情。综上,本研究可为北方干旱区应对同类复杂场景提供科学参考。
Abstract: The “5·8” hail event in Xi’an in 2025 occurred against the background of a rare spring drought and overlapped in time and space with the provincial-wide artificial precipitation enhancement operations for drought relief, resulting in triple operational challenges. Based on the analysis of multi-source data including conventional meteorological observations, radar and satellite observations, ERA5 reanalysis and emergency public opinion data, the results show that: (1) The hail was a natural severe convective outcome triggered by the conjunction of cold advection in the 500 hPa upper trough and the southwest warm and humid jet at 850 hPa as well as the surface cold front, superimposed with favorable temperature stratification and vertical wind shear; (2) Artificial precipitation enhancement only supplemented cloud condensation nuclei without changing the core meteorological conditions for severe convection, and had no direct causal relationship with the hail; (3) The provincial numerical forecast model could capture the overall trend of severe convection, and the dual-polarization radar could realize a 15~30 minute short-term early warning for hail, with room for improvement in early warning accuracy; (4) Through emergency response, three-dimensional artificial precipitation enhancement and multi-platform scientific popularization, the meteorological department effectively alleviated the drought and quickly eliminated negative public opinion. In summary, this study can provide a scientific reference for northern arid areas to respond to similar complex scenarios.
文章引用:牛亚萍, 刘环, 范倩莹, 冯蕾, 彭欣. 西安“5·8”干旱背景下冰雹机理与服务响应[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2026, 15(3): 572-582. https://doi.org/10.12677/ccrl.2026.153063

参考文献

[1] 郑永光, 张小玲, 周庆亮, 等. 强对流天气短时临近预报业务技术进展与挑战[J]. 气象, 2010, 36(7): 33-42.
[2] 郑永光, 杨波, 蓝渝, 等. 强对流天气形成机制和预报研究综述[J]. 气象, 2025, 51(11): 1495-1522.
[3] 赵强, 陈小婷, 王楠, 等. 副热带高压影响下陕西关中强对流发生的环境场特征及触发机制[J]. 气象, 2022, 48(1): 28-43.
[4] 马荣君, 李潇斐, 毛彦霖, 等. 陕西省冰雹气候变化特征及其关键影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 767-773.
[5] Allen, J.T., Giammanco, I.M., Kumjian, M.R., et al. (2020) Understanding Hail in the Earth System. Reviews of Geophysics, 58, e2019RG000665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 许爱华, 孙继松, 许东蓓, 万雪丽, 郭艳. 中国中东部强对流天气的天气形势分类和基本要素配置特征[J]. 气象, 2014, 40(4): 400-411.
[7] 陈涛, 谌芸, 方翀, 等. “23·7”华北极端暴雨精细特征和天气学成因分析[J]. 气象学报, 2024, 82(5): 600-614.
[8] 褚芸欣. 基于ERA5再分析资料的川东地区一次冬季强对流天气综合分析[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2024, 14(11): 113-115.
[9] 钟晨, 张羽, 高建秋, 等. 双偏振多普勒天气雷达在冰雹识别中的应用[J]. 广东气象, 2014, 36(4): 76-80.
[10] 潘佳文, 高丽, 魏鸣. 基于S波段双偏振雷达观测的雹暴偏振特征分析[J]. 气象学报, 2021, 79(1): 168-180.
[11] 姚展予, 屠琦, 安琳, 等. 冰雹形成过程及人工防雹研究综述[J]. 气象学报, 2022, 80(6): 835-863.
[12] 崔金刚. 强化科普宣传提升公众对人工影响天气认知能力的思考[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2025, 15(1): 176-178.
[13] 杨永清, 王鹏博, 张媛媛. 气象灾害舆情的时空演化特征及影响因素分析[J]. 晋图学刊, 2024(4): 16-29.
[14] 王世雷, 郑玲, 朱金菊, 等. 新媒体环境下气象突发事件舆情应急机制研究——以“互联网上下的雪”事件为例[J]. 新闻研究导刊, 2016, 7(14): 67.