考虑路面黏着约束的重型叉车群自适应安全间隔控制方法研究
Research on Adaptive Safety Spacing Control Method for Heavy Forklift Fleets Considering Road Adhesion Constraints
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2026.155083, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 毕少平:衢州职业技术学院机电工程学院,浙江 衢州;姚彬启:衢州市川慧达科技有限公司,浙江 衢州;苏飞飞:浙江鼎达不锈钢制品有限公司,浙江 衢州;余猛钢:衢州市荣胜环保科技有限公司,浙江 衢州;毛海军:浙江管卫建设有限公司,浙江 衢州
关键词: 叉车自适应控制编队控制数据驱动Forklift Adaptive Control Formation Control Data-Driven
摘要: 新能源重型叉车在动态仓储作业中,由于路面条件(黏着系数)的突变常导致编队控制精度下降及碰撞风险增加。本文针对这一问题,提出了一种基于数据驱动的黏着预见感知与安全间隔自适应调整策略。首先,建立考虑路面黏着限制的重型叉车纵向动力学模型;其次,引入区间泰勒可达性分析,实时解算不同路面条件下的最小安全制动距离;最后,设计了一种改进的无模型自适应协同控制(MFAC)算法,实现了编队间距随路面工况自适应调整。仿真结果表明,该方法在路面黏着系数波动环境下,能够有效缩短编队间距并杜绝碰撞风险,提升作业效率31.86%以上。
Abstract: In dynamic warehousing operations, new energy heavy-duty forklifts often experience reduced formation control accuracy and increased collision risks due to sudden changes in road conditions (adhesion coefficient). To address this issue, this paper proposes a data-driven strategy for adhesion preview perception and adaptive adjustment of safety intervals. First, a longitudinal dynamic model of heavy-duty forklifts considering road adhesion limitations is established. Second, interval Taylor reachability analysis is introduced to compute the minimum safe braking distance under different road conditions in real time. Finally, an improved model-free adaptive cooperative control (MFAC) algorithm is designed to achieve adaptive adjustment of formation spacing according to road conditions. Simulation results demonstrate that this method can effectively reduce formation spacing and eliminate collision risks under fluctuating road adhesion coefficient conditions, improving operational efficiency by more than 31.86%.
文章引用:毕少平, 姚彬启, 苏飞飞, 余猛钢, 毛海军. 考虑路面黏着约束的重型叉车群自适应安全间隔控制方法研究[J]. 建模与仿真, 2026, 15(5): 197-206. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2026.155083

参考文献

[1] 李柏. 复杂约束下自动驾驶车辆运动规划的计算最优控制方法研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018.
[2] 彭周华, 吴文涛, 王丹, 刘陆. 多无人艇集群协同控制研究进展与未来趋势[J]. 中国舰船研究2021, 16(1): 51-64.
[3] 陈浩宇, 徐海祥, 魏骁, 王健, 陈伟. 基于KFESO的多无人艇分布式协同路径跟踪复合抗扰控制[J]. 中国舰船研究2025, 20(1): 191-202.
[4] Liu, L., Wang, D., Peng, Z., Li, T. and Chen, C.L.P. (2020) Cooperative Path Following Ring-Networked Under-Actuated Autonomous Surface Vehicles: Algorithms and Experimental Results. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 50, 1519-1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Fu, M.Y. and Yu, L.L. (2018) Finite-Time Extended State Observer-Based Distributed Formation Control for Marine Surface Vehicles with Input Saturation and Disturbances. Ocean Engineering, 159, 219-227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Hu, B.B., Zhang, H.T., Liu, B., et al. (2022) Distributed Surrounding Control of Multiple Unmanned Surface Vessels with Varying Interconnection Topologies. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 30, 400-407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 杨艳华, 吕童, 柴利. 基于ESKF-MPC的四旋翼无人机轨迹跟踪控制[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报2022, 36(7): 24-32.
[8] Yuan, C., Liu, Z.X. and Zhang, Y.M. (2017) Aerial Images-Based Forest Fire Detection for Firefighting Using Optical Remote Sensing Techniques and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 88, 635-654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Shen, D. and Wang, Y.Q. (2014) Survey on Stochastic Iterative Learning Control. Journal of Process Control, 24, 64-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 方浩, 赵欣悦, 陈杰. 无人飞行器集群自主控制: 预设性能驱动的安全编队控制[J]. 自动化学报, 2025, 51(5): 931-941.
[11] 许男, 尹卓, 张岳韬, 等. 考虑执行器特性的自适应预测时域MPC轨迹跟踪控制[J]. 汽车工程, 2025, 47(10): 1847-1860.
[12] 陶昭, 侯忠生. 复杂网络的无模型自适应牵制控制[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 120-127.