脑机接口技术在神经康复中的作用机制及 临床应用进展
Advances of Mechanisms and Clinical Application of Brain-Computer Interface Technology in Neurorehabilitation
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1652072, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 郑瑞航, 张素妍, 沈静宜, 张 琪*:杭州医学院康复学院,浙江 杭州;韩正洋, 杨 曦:杭州医学院临床医学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 脑机接口神经康复作用机制临床应用Brain-Computer Interface Neurorehabilitation Mechanism Clinical Application
摘要: 神经疾病,如脑卒中、帕金森病、阿尔茨海默病等,往往会导致不可逆的残疾。脑机接口(Brain-Computer Interface, BCI)技术有望通过直接刺激大脑皮层活动或将自身产生的大脑皮层活动转化为外部辅助设备的指令,来恢复或替代受损的运动、认知和精神调节功能。本文系统综述BCI技术在神经康复中的基本原理及作用机制,重点归纳了BCI在运动功能障碍、认知功能障碍及精神障碍康复中的应用,旨在为临床医生和研究人员提供最新的BCI技术与临床应用现状,推动BCI在神经康复与个性化医疗领域中的快速发展。
Abstract: Neurological diseases, such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, etc., often lead to irreversible disabilities. Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology has the potential to restore or replace damaged motor, cognitive and mental regulatory functions by directly stimulating the activity of the cerebral cortex or converting the self-generated activity of the cerebral cortex into instructions for external assistive devices. This article systematically reviews the basic principles and mechanisms of BCI technology in neurorehabilitation, focusing on summarizing the applications of BCI in rehabilitation treatment for motor dysfunction, cognitive dysfunction and mental disorders. The aim is to provide clinicians and researchers with the latest status of BCI technology and clinical translation, and to promote the rapid development of BCI in the fields of neurorehabilitation and personalized medicine.
文章引用:郑瑞航, 张素妍, 沈静宜, 韩正洋, 杨曦, 张琪. 脑机接口技术在神经康复中的作用机制及 临床应用进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(5): 2618-2632. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1652072

参考文献

[1] Steinmetz, J.D., Seeher, K.M., Schiess, N., Nichols, E., Cao, B., Servili, C., et al. (2024) Global, Regional, and National Burden of Disorders Affecting the Nervous System, 1990-2021: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Neurology, 23, 344-381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Vestergaard, S.V., Rasmussen, T.B., Stallknecht, S., Olsen, J., Skipper, N., Sørensen, H.T., et al. (2020) Occurrence, Mortality and Cost of Brain Disorders in Denmark: A Population-Based Cohort Study. BMJ Open, 10, e037564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Fuglsang, C.H., Rasmussen, T.B., Rudolfsen, J.H., Olsen, J., Skipper, N., Ulrichsen, S.P., et al. (2025) Occurrence, Mortality, and Economic Burden of Brain Disorders in Denmark, 2015-2021: A Population-Based Cohort Study. The Lancet Regional HealthEurope, 50, Article ID: 101189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Levin, M.F., Kleim, J.A. and Wolf, S.L. (2009) What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke? Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 313-319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Takeoka, A., Vollenweider, I., Courtine, G. and Arber, S. (2014) Muscle Spindle Feedback Directs Locomotor Recovery and Circuit Reorganization after Spinal Cord Injury. Cell, 159, 1626-1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Mane, R., Chouhan, T. and Guan, C. (2020) BCI for Stroke Rehabilitation: Motor and Beyond. Journal of Neural Engineering, 17, Article ID: 041001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Biasiucci, A., Leeb, R., Iturrate, I., Perdikis, S., Al-Khodairy, A., Corbet, T., et al. (2018) Brain-Actuated Functional Electrical Stimulation Elicits Lasting Arm Motor Recovery after Stroke. Nature Communications, 9, Article No. 2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Roc, A., Pillette, L., Mladenovic, J., Benaroch, C., N’Kaoua, B., Jeunet, C., et al. (2021) A Review of User Training Methods in Brain Computer Interfaces Based on Mental Tasks. Journal of Neural Engineering, 18, Article ID: 011002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 中国科学院. 我国侵入式脑机接口进入临床试验阶段[EB/OL].
https://www.cas.cn/syky/202506/t20250614_5073157.shtml, 2025-06-14.
[10] Schalk, G., McFarland, D.J., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N. and Wolpaw, J.R. (2004) BCI2000: A General-Purpose Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51, 1034-1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Sun, Y., Chen, X., Liu, B., Liang, L., Wang, Y., Gao, S., et al. (2025) Signal Acquisition of Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Medical-Engineering Crossover Perspective Review. Fundamental Research, 5, 3-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Tai, P., Ding, P., Wang, F., Gong, A., Li, T., Zhao, L., et al. (2024) Brain-Computer Interface Paradigms and Neural Coding. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, Article 1345961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Lotte, F., Congedo, M., Lécuyer, A., Lamarche, F. and Arnaldi, B. (2007) A Review of Classification Algorithms for EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces. Journal of Neural Engineering, 4, R1-R13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Remsik, A.B., Gjini, K., Williams, L., van Kan, P.L.E., Gloe, S., Bjorklund, E., et al. (2021) Ipsilesional Mu Rhythm Desynchronization Correlates with Improvements in Affected Hand Grip Strength and Functional Connectivity in Sensorimotor Cortices Following BCI-FES Intervention for Upper Extremity in Stroke Survivors. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, Article 725645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Neuper, C., Wörtz, M. and Pfurtscheller, G. (2006) ERD/ERS Patterns Reflecting Sensorimotor Activation and Deactivation. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 211-222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Takemi, M., Masakado, Y., Liu, M. and Ushiba, J. (2013) Event-Related Desynchronization Reflects Downregulation of Intracortical Inhibition in Human Primary Motor Cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110, 1158-1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 陈龙, 张定泽, 王坤, 等. 运动意图的头皮脑电编解码及其脑-机接口研究进展[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2023, 45(10): 3458-3467.
[18] Yadav, H. and Maini, S. (2025) Decoding Brain Signals: A Comprehensive Review of EEG-Based BCI Paradigms, Signal Processing and Applications. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 196, Article ID: 110937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 葛祎, 仲颖, 洪文军, 等. 脑机接口在中枢神经系统疾病康复中的应用[J]. 康复学报, 2025, 35(4): 393-398.
[20] Rashid, M., Sulaiman, N., P. P. Abdul Majeed, A., Musa, R.M., Ab. Nasir, A.F., Bari, B.S., et al. (2020) Current Status, Challenges, and Possible Solutions of EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface: A Comprehensive Review. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 14, Article 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Griggs, W.S., Norman, S.L., Deffieux, T., Segura, F., Osmanski, B., Chau, G., et al. (2024) Decoding Motor Plans Using a Closed-Loop Ultrasonic Brain-Machine Interface. Nature Neuroscience, 27, 196-207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Zhao, Z., Nie, C., Jiang, C., Cao, S., Tian, K., Yu, S., et al. (2023) Modulating Brain Activity with Invasive Brain–computer Interface: A Narrative Review. Brain Sciences, 13, Article 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Volkova, K., Lebedev, M.A., Kaplan, A. and Ossadtchi, A. (2019) Decoding Movement from Electrocorticographic Activity: A Review. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 13, Article 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Gao, X., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Liu, B. and Gao, S. (2025) Brain-Computer Interface—A Brain-In-The-Loop Communication System. Proceedings of the IEEE, 113, 478-511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Yue, J., Xiao, X., Wang, K., Yi, W., Jung, T., Xu, M., et al. (2025) Augmenting Electroencephalogram Transformer for Steady-State Visually Evoked Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces. Cyborg and Bionic Systems, 6, Article ID: 0379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Mirifar, A., Keil, A. and Ehrlenspiel, F. (2022) Neurofeedback and Neural Self-Regulation: A New Perspective Based on Allostasis. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 33, 607-629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Sitaram, R., Ros, T., Stoeckel, L., Haller, S., Scharnowski, F., Lewis-Peacock, J., et al. (2017) Closed-Loop Brain Training: The Science of Neurofeedback. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 86-100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Hu, Y., Gao, T., Li, J., Tao, J., Bai, Y. and Lu, R. (2021) Motor Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface Combined with Multimodal Feedback to Promote Upper Limb Motor Function after Stroke: A Preliminary Study. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2021, Article ID: 1116126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Daly, J.J. and Wolpaw, J.R. (2008) Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neurological Rehabilitation. The Lancet Neurology, 7, 1032-1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] 贾杰. “中枢-外周-中枢”闭环康复——脑卒中后手功能康复新理念[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2016, 31(11): 1180-1182.
[31] Liu, Z., Xin, H. and Chopp, M. (2021) Axonal Remodeling of the Corticospinal Tract during Neurological Recovery after Stroke. Neural Regeneration Research, 16, 939-943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] 林志强, 王安妮, 高润, 等. 运动想象疗法在脑卒中后运动功能康复中的研究进展[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(1): 117-120, 139.
[33] Jin, W., Zhu, X., Qian, L., Wu, C., Yang, F., Zhan, D., et al. (2024) Electroencephalogram-Based Adaptive Closed-Loop Brain-Computer Interface in Neurorehabilitation: A Review. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 18, Article 1431815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Khorev, V., Kurkin, S., Badarin, A., Antipov, V., Pitsik, E., Andreev, A., et al. (2024) Review on the Use of Brain Computer Interface Rehabilitation Methods for Treating Mental and Neurological Conditions. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 23, Article 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Sakurai, Y. and Song, K. (2016) Neural Operant Conditioning as a Core Mechanism of Brain-Machine Interface Control. Technologies, 4, Article 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Yang, S., Li, R., Li, H., Xu, K., Shi, Y., Wang, Q., et al. (2021) Exploring the Use of Brain‐Computer Interfaces in Stroke Neurorehabilitation. BioMed Research International, 2021, Article ID: 9967348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Mane, R., Wu, Z. and Wang, D. (2022) Poststroke Motor, Cognitive and Speech Rehabilitation with Brain-Computer Interface: A Perspective Review. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 7, 541-549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Bunday, K.L. and Perez, M.A. (2012) Motor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury Enhanced by Strengthening Corticospinal Synaptic Transmission. Current Biology, 22, 2355-2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Dodd, K.C., Nair, V.A. and Prabhakaran, V. (2017) Role of the Contralesional vs. Ipsilesional Hemisphere in Stroke Recovery. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Cervera, M.A., Soekadar, S.R., Ushiba, J., Millán, J.D.R., Liu, M., Birbaumer, N., et al. (2018) Brain‐Computer Interfaces for Post‐Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Meta‐Analysis. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, 5, 651-663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Sinha, A.M., Nair, V.A. and Prabhakaran, V. (2021) Brain-Computer Interface Training with Functional Electrical Stimulation: Facilitating Changes in Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity and Motor Outcomes Post-Stroke. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, Article 670953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Yuan, K., Chen, C., Wang, X., Chu, W.C. and Tong, R.K. (2021) BCI Training Effects on Chronic Stroke Correlate with Functional Reorganization in Motor-Related Regions: A Concurrent EEG and fMRI Study. Brain Sciences, 11, Article 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Cantillo-Negrete, J., Rodríguez-García, M.E., Carrillo-Mora, P., Arias-Carrión, O., Ortega-Robles, E., Galicia-Alvarado, M.A., et al. (2025) The Rehand-BCI Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Brain-Computer Interface for Upper Extremity Stroke Neurorehabilitation. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 19, Article 1579988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Mang, J., Xu, Z., Qi, Y. and Zhang, T. (2023) Favoring the Cognitive-Motor Process in the Closed-Loop of BCI Mediated Post Stroke Motor Function Recovery: Challenges and Approaches. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 17, Article 1271967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Ji, X., Lu, X., Xu, Y., Zhang, W., Yang, H., Yin, C., et al. (2025) Effects and Neural Mechanisms of a Brain-Computer Interface-Controlled Soft Robotic Glove on Upper Limb Function in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled fNIRS Study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 22, Article No. 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Liu, L., Jin, M., Zhang, L., Zhang, Q., Hu, D., Jin, L., et al. (2022) Brain-Computer Interface-Robot Training Enhances Upper Extremity Performance and Changes the Cortical Activation in Stroke Patients: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, Article 809657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] He, J., Yuan, Z., Quan, L., Xi, H., Guo, J., Zhu, D., et al. (2025) Multimodal Assessment of a BCI System for Stroke Rehabilitation Integrating Motor Imagery and Motor Attempts: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 22, Article No. 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] Hu, M., Cheng, H., Ji, F., Chong, J.S.X., Lu, Z., Huang, W., et al. (2021) Brain Functional Changes in Stroke Following Rehabilitation Using Brain-Computer Interface-Assisted Motor Imagery with and without tDCS: A Pilot Study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, Article 692304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhou, B., Xia, C., Su, M., et al. (2025) Unveiling the Upper-Limb Functional Recovery Mechanisms in Stroke Patients Using Brain-Machine Interfaces: A Near-Infrared Functional Imaging-Based Study. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 39704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[50] Remsik, A.B., Williams, L., Gjini, K., Dodd, K., Thoma, J., Jacobson, T., et al. (2019) Ipsilesional Mu Rhythm Desynchronization and Changes in Motor Behavior Following Post Stroke BCI Intervention for Motor Rehabilitation. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, Article 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Pichiorri, F., Morone, G., Petti, M., Toppi, J., Pisotta, I., Molinari, M., et al. (2015) Brain-Computer Interface Boosts Motor Imagery Practice during Stroke Recovery. Annals of Neurology, 77, 851-865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[52] Kollai, S., Bereczki, D., Dobi, B., Glasz, T. and Kovács, T. (2025) Histopathological Changes of the Corticospinal Tract Following Hemorrhagic and Ischemic Stroke. Brain Sciences, 15, Article 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[53] Casula, E.P., Pellicciari, M.C., Bonnì, S., Spanò, B., Ponzo, V., Salsano, I., et al. (2021) Evidence for Interhemispheric Imbalance in Stroke Patients as Revealed by Combining Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography. Human Brain Mapping, 42, 1343-1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[54] Zeiler, S.R. and Krakauer, J.W. (2013) The Interaction between Training and Plasticity in the Poststroke Brain. Current Opinion in Neurology, 26, 609-616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[55] Monday, H.R. and Castillo, P.E. (2017) Closing the Gap: Long-Term Presynaptic Plasticity in Brain Function and Disease. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 45, 106-112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[56] Alia, C., Spalletti, C., Lai, S., Panarese, A., Lamola, G., Bertolucci, F., et al. (2017) Neuroplastic Changes Following Brain Ischemia and Their Contribution to Stroke Recovery: Novel Approaches in Neurorehabilitation. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 11, Article 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[57] Daly, J.J., Cheng, R., Rogers, J., Litinas, K., Hrovat, K. and Dohring, M. (2009) Feasibility of a New Application of Noninvasive Brain Computer Interface (BCI): A Case Study of Training for Recovery of Volitional Motor Control after Stroke. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 33, 203-211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[58] Ren, C., Li, X., Gao, Q., Pan, M., Wang, J., Yang, F., et al. (2024) The Effect of Brain-Computer Interface Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Training on Rehabilitation of Upper Limb after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 18, Article 1438095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[59] Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., Zhou, J., Zhang, Z., Feng, M. and Liu, Y. (2025) Advances in Brain-Computer Interface Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Upper Limb Recovery after Stroke. Brain Research Bulletin, 226, Article ID: 111354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[60] Bai, Z., Fong, K.N.K., Zhang, J.J., Chan, J. and Ting, K.H. (2020) Immediate and Long-Term Effects of BCI-Based Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremity after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 17, Article No. 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[61] Young, B.M., Nigogosyan, Z., Remsik, A., Walton, L.M., Song, J., Nair, V.A., et al. (2014) Changes in Functional Connectivity Correlate with Behavioral Gains in Stroke Patients after Therapy Using a Brain-Computer Interface Device. Frontiers in Neuroengineering, 7, Article 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[62] Ang, K.K., Guan, C., Phua, K.S., Wang, C., Zhou, L., Tang, K.Y., et al. (2014) Brain-Computer Interface-Based Robotic End Effector System for Wrist and Hand Rehabilitation: Results of a Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial for Chronic Stroke. Frontiers in Neuroengineering, 7, Article 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[63] Lau, C.C.Y., Yuan, K., Wong, P.C.M., Chu, W.C.W., Leung, T.W., Wong, W., et al. (2021) Modulation of Functional Connectivity and Low-Frequency Fluctuations after Brain-Computer Interface-Guided Robot Hand Training in Chronic Stroke: A 6-Month Follow-Up Study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, Article 611064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[64] Wang, K., Liu, Y., Tian, F., Yi, W., Zhang, Y., Jung, T., et al. (2025) Adaptive Neurofeedback Training Using a Virtual Reality Game Enhances Motor Imagery Performance in Brain-Computer Interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 33, 2956-2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[65] Vourvopoulos, A., Pardo, O.M., Lefebvre, S., Neureither, M., Saldana, D., Jahng, E., et al. (2019) Effects of a Brain-Computer Interface with Virtual Reality (VR) Neurofeedback: A Pilot Study in Chronic Stroke Patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, Article 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[66] Khan, A., Imam, Y.Z., Muneer, M., Al Jerdi, S. and Gill, S.K. (2024) Virtual Reality in Stroke Recovery: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews. Bioelectronic Medicine, 10, Article No. 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[67] Ziadeh, H., Gulyas, D., Nielsen, L.D., Lehmann, S., Nielsen, T.B., Kjeldsen, T.K.K., et al. (2021) “Mine Works Better”: Examining the Influence of Embodiment in Virtual Reality on the Sense of Agency during a Binary Motor Imagery Task with a Brain-Computer Interface. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 806424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[68] Arlotti, M., Colombo, M., Bonfanti, A., Mandat, T., Lanotte, M.M., Pirola, E., et al. (2021) A New Implantable Closed-Loop Clinical Neural Interface: First Application in Parkinson’s Disease. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, Article 763235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[69] Sandoval-Pistorius, S.S., Hacker, M.L., Waters, A.C., Wang, J., Provenza, N.R., de Hemptinne, C., et al. (2023) Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation: From Mechanisms to Applications. The Journal of Neuroscience, 43, 7575-7586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[70] Mohammed, A., Bayford, R. and Demosthenous, A. (2020) A Framework for Adapting Deep Brain Stimulation Using Parkinsonian State Estimates. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, Article 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[71] Little, S., Pogosyan, A., Neal, S., Zavala, B., Zrinzo, L., Hariz, M., et al. (2013) Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Advanced Parkinson Disease. Annals of Neurology, 74, 449-457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[72] Little, S., Beudel, M., Zrinzo, L., Foltynie, T., Limousin, P., Hariz, M., et al. (2016) Bilateral Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Is Effective in Parkinson’s Disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 87, 717-721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[73] Yin, Z., Zhu, G., Liu, Y., Zhao, B., Liu, D., Bai, Y., et al. (2022) Cortical Phase-Amplitude Coupling Is Key to the Occurrence and Treatment of Freezing of Gait. Brain, 145, 2407-2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[74] Ortega-Robles, E., Carino-Escobar, R.I., Cantillo-Negrete, J. and Arias-Carrión, O. (2025) Brain-Computer Interfaces in Parkinson’s Disease Rehabilitation. Biomimetics, 10, Article 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[75] Anjum, A., Yazid, M.D., Fauzi Daud, M., Idris, J., Ng, A.M.H., Selvi Naicker, A., et al. (2020) Spinal Cord Injury: Pathophysiology, Multimolecular Interactions, and Underlying Recovery Mechanisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, Article 7533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[76] Lorach, H., Galvez, A., Spagnolo, V., Martel, F., Karakas, S., Intering, N., et al. (2023) Walking Naturally after Spinal Cord Injury Using a Brain–spine Interface. Nature, 618, 126-133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[77] Jayaraman, C., Embry, K.R., Mummidisetty, C.K., Moon, Y., Giffhorn, M., Prokup, S., et al. (2022) Modular Hip Exoskeleton Improves Walking Function and Reduces Sedentary Time in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 19, Article No. 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[78] Cui, Z., Lin, J., Fu, X., Zhang, S., Li, P., Wu, X., et al. (2023) Construction of the Dynamic Model of SCI Rehabilitation Using Bidirectional Stimulation and Its Application in Rehabilitating with BCI. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 17, 169-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[79] Ivanenko, Y., Shapkova, E.Y., Petrova, D.A., Kleeva, D.F. and Lebedev, M.A. (2023) Exoskeleton Gait Training with Spinal Cord Neuromodulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 17, Article 1194702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[80] Shokur, S., Donati, A.R.C., Campos, D.S.F., Gitti, C., Bao, G., Fischer, D., et al. (2018) Training with Brain-Machine Interfaces, Visuo-Tactile Feedback and Assisted Locomotion Improves Sensorimotor, Visceral, and Psychological Signs in Chronic Paraplegic Patients. PLOS ONE, 13, e0206464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[81] Petersen, R.C., Smith, G.E., Waring, S.C., Ivnik, R.J., Tangalos, E.G. and Kokmen, E. (1999) Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Characterization and Outcome. Archives of Neurology, 56, 303-308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[82] Vecchio, F., Miraglia, F., Iberite, F., Lacidogna, G., Guglielmi, V., Marra, C., et al. (2018) Sustainable Method for Alzheimer Dementia Prediction in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Electroencephalographic Connectivity and Graph Theory Combined with Apolipoprotein E. Annals of Neurology, 84, 302-314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[83] Parra, M.A., Ascencio, L.L., Urquina, H.F., Manes, F. and Ibáñez, A.M. (2012) P300 and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Dementia. Frontiers in Neurology, 3, Article 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[84] Meghdadi, A.H., Salat, D., Hamilton, J., Hong, Y., Boeve, B.F., St Louis, E.K., et al. (2024) EEG and ERP Biosignatures of Mild Cognitive Impairment for Longitudinal Monitoring of Early Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer’s Disease. PLOS ONE, 19, e0308137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[85] Simfukwe, C., Youn, Y.C., Kim, M., Paik, J. and Han, S. (2023) CNN for a Regression Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Cognitive Impairment Using qEEG. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 19, 851-863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[86] Arvaneh, M., Robertson, I.H. and Ward, T.E. (2019) A P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Improving Attention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, Article 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[87] Li, X., Zhang, Y., Tang, L., Ye, L. and Tang, M. (2025) Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Interventions on Cognitive Function, Emotional State, and Quality of Life in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Neurology, 16, Article 1496382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[88] Peng, L., Zhang, Z., Li, Q., Song, Z., Yan, C. and Ling, H. (2024) Unveiling the Multifaceted Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Drugs of Alzheimer’s Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Heliyon, 10, e39217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[89] Christensen, D.D. (2007) Changing the Course of Alzheimer’s Disease: Anti-Amyloid Disease-Modifying Treatments on the Horizon. The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 9, 32-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[90] Safi, M.S. and Safi, S.M.M. (2021) Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease from EEG Signals Using Hjorth Parameters. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 65, Article ID: 102338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[91] Cassani, R., Falk, T.H., Fraga, F.J., Cecchi, M., Moore, D.K. and Anghinah, R. (2017) Towards Automated Electroencephalography-Based Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis Using Portable Low-Density Devices. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 33, 261-271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[92] Perpetuini, D., Chiarelli, A.M., Filippini, C., Cardone, D., Croce, P., Rotunno, L., et al. (2020) Working Memory Decline in Alzheimer’s Disease Is Detected by Complexity Analysis of Multimodal EEG-fNIRS. Entropy, 22, Article 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[93] Lin, Y., Jin, J., Lv, R., Luo, Y., Dai, W., Li, W., et al. (2021) Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Increases the Brain’s Drainage Efficiency in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Acta Neuropathologica Communications, 9, Article No. 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[94] Jin, J., Wang, Y., Ye, X., Lv, R., Dai, W., Li, W., et al. (2021) Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Ameliorates the Pathology and Cognitive Dysfunction in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease through Increased Drainage Efficiency of Meningeal Lymphatic System. Alzheimers & Dementia, 17, e053481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[95] Grewe, P., Kohsik, A., Flentge, D., Dyck, E., Botsch, M., Winter, Y., et al. (2013) Learning Real-Life Cognitive Abilities in a Novel 360°-Virtual Reality Supermarket: A Neuropsychological Study of Healthy Participants and Patients with Epilepsy. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 10, Article No. 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[96] Yang, W. (2024) Brain-Computer Interfaces in Cognitive Rehabilitation for Alzheimer’s Disease. Theoretical and Natural Science, 64, 163-169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[97] Sam, A., Boostani, R., Hashempour, S., Taghavi, M. and Sanei, S. (2023) Depression Identification Using EEG Signals via a Hybrid of LSTM and Spiking Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 31, 4725-4737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[98] Kang, C., Novak, D., Yao, X., Xie, J. and Hu, Y. (2023) Classifying and Scoring Major Depressive Disorders by Residual Neural Networks on Specific Frequencies and Brain Regions. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 31, 2964-2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[99] Chao, J., Zheng, S., Wu, H., Wang, D., Zhang, X., Peng, H., et al. (2021) fNIRS Evidence for Distinguishing Patients with Major Depression and Healthy Controls. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 29, 2211-2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[100] Scangos, K.W., Khambhati, A.N., Daly, P.M., Makhoul, G.S., Sugrue, L.P., Zamanian, H., et al. (2021) Closed-Loop Neuromodulation in an Individual with Treatment-Resistant Depression. Nature Medicine, 27, 1696-1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[101] Schuwerk, T. and Sodian, B. (2023) Differences in Self‐Other Control as Cognitive Mechanism to Characterize Theory of Mind Reasoning in Autistic and Non‐Autistic Adults. Autism Research, 16, 1728-1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[102] Wang, J., Barstein, J., Ethridge, L.E., Mosconi, M.W., Takarae, Y. and Sweeney, J.A. (2013) Resting State EEG Abnormalities in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 5, Article No. 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[103] Bosl, W., Tierney, A., Tager-Flusberg, H. and Nelson, C. (2011) EEG Complexity as a Biomarker for Autism Spectrum Disorder Risk. BMC Medicine, 9, Article No. 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[104] Andrade, J., Cecílio, J., Simões, M., Sales, F. and Castelo-Branco, M. (2017) Separability of Motor Imagery of the Self from Interpretation of Motor Intentions of Others at the Single Trial Level: An EEG Study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 14, Article No. 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[105] Abdolzadegan, D., Moattar, M.H. and Ghoshuni, M. (2020) A Robust Method for Early Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder from EEG Signals Based on Feature Selection and DBSCAN Method. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 40, 482-493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[106] Huang, G., Zhao, Z., Zhang, S., Hu, Z., Fan, J., Fu, M., et al. (2023) Discrepancy between Inter-and Intra-Subject Variability in EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface: Evidence from Multiple Perspectives. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, Article 1122661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[107] Müller-Komorowska, D., Opitz, T., Elzoheiry, S., Schweizer, M., Ambrad Giovannetti, E. and Beck, H. (2020) Nonspecific Expression in Limited Excitatory Cell Populations in Interneuron-Targeting Cre-Driver Lines Can Have Large Functional Effects. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 14, Article 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[108] Tonin, A., Semprini, M., Kiper, P. and Mantini, D. (2025) Brain-Computer Interfaces for Stroke Motor Rehabilitation. Bioengineering, 12, Article 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef