新制度主义视角下现代产业学院组织创新的困境及其纾解策略研究
The Dilemma and Resolution of Organizational Innovation in Modern Industry Colleges from the Perspective of New Institutionalism
摘要: 现代产业学院是我国深化产教融合、推动高等教育供给侧改革的重要组织创新形式。自2020年《现代产业学院建设指南(试行)》印发以来,各地高校纷纷设立现代产业学院,但普遍面临组织形态趋同、实质创新不足、校企合作“貌合神离”等深层困境。本文引入新制度主义组织分析框架,以DiMaggio和Powell的制度同构理论及Meyer和Rowan的合法性与脱耦概念为核心工具,剖析其组织创新困境的制度根源,并提出纾解策略。研究旨在从组织社会学层面揭示现代产业学院创新受阻的深层制度逻辑,为政策优化与实践改进提供理论参照。
Abstract: Modern Industry Colleges represent a significant organizational innovation in China’s efforts to deepen industry-education integration and advance supply-side reform in higher education. Since the issuance of the “Guidelines for the Construction of Modern Industry Colleges (Trial)” in 2020, universities across the country have established numerous such colleges. However, they commonly face deep-seated challenges, including homogenized organizational forms, insufficient substantive innovation, and a superficial or disengaged collaboration between universities and enterprises. This paper adopts a new institutionalist framework for organizational analysis, using DiMaggio and Powell’s theory of institutional isomorphism and Meyer and Rowan’s concepts of legitimacy and decoupling as core analytical tools, to examine the institutional roots of these innovation dilemmas and propose corresponding solutions. The study aims to reveal the underlying institutional logic hindering innovation in Modern Industry Colleges from an organizational sociology perspective, offering theoretical reference for policy refinement and practical improvement.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
教育部办公厅 工业和信息化部办公厅关于印发《现代产业学院建设指南(试行)》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202008/t20200820_479133.html,2026-03-23.
|
|
[2]
|
国务院办公厅关于深化产教融合的若干意见[EB/OL]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-12/19/content_5248564.htm,2026-03-23.
|
|
[3]
|
徐正兴, 江作军. 现代产业学院的基本样态、主要挑战与治理要素[J]. 江苏高教, 2025(6): 47-54.
|
|
[4]
|
丁冉, 李云梅. 行业产教融合共同体产教对接的价值意蕴、现实困境及机制构建[J]. 天津职业院校联合学报, 2025, 27(7): 25-29.
|
|
[5]
|
DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
周雪光. 组织社会学十讲[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2003.
|
|
[7]
|
Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977) Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Suchman, M.C. (1995) Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
吴建平. 当前中国高等教育中的制度化现象——中国高校运作机制的组织社会学分析[J]. 现代教育管理, 2012(3): 59-63.
|
|
[10]
|
Scott, W.R. (2014) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. 4th Edition, Sage Publications.
|
|
[11]
|
刘睿, 刘岩, 李正. 校企共赢机制的现代产业学院建设思路探讨——以天津中医药大学中药制药现代产业学院为例[J]. 药学教育, 2025, 41(1): 16-20.
|
|
[12]
|
丁建洋. 现代产业学院的本质意蕴、生成动力与共建机制[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2025, 23(2): 85-93.
|
|
[13]
|
Battilana, J., Leca, B. and Boxenbaum, E. (2009) 2 How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|