福利经济学对中国个人养老金政策的影响——基于帕累托最优的分析性框架
The Impact of Welfare Economics on China’s Personal Pension Policy—An Analytical Framework Based on Pareto Optimality
摘要: 个人养老金作为中国多层次养老保险体系的重要组成部分,其税收政策的合理性直接影响政策覆盖广度、公平性与长期可持续性。本文以福利经济学中的帕累托最优理论为核心分析框架,结合年金理论、成本–收益理论与多支柱养老保险理论,系统梳理2018年以来中国个人养老金政策的演进历程,重点剖析当前税收政策在激励结构、公平性与财政可持续性方面的突出问题。研究发现:现行1.2万元/年的税收扣除上限导致激励覆盖面不足,中低收入群体参与意愿薄弱;领取环节3%的统一税率引发公平性争议;缴费与投资环节的税收减免亦对当期财政造成压力。基于此,本文提出“分层补贴 + 动态税优”的激励重构方案、跨周期财政平衡机制及政策协同创新路径,旨在通过帕累托改进实现个人养老金福利效用最大化,为完善中国社会保障政策提供理论参考与实践建议。
Abstract: As an important component of China’s multi-tiered pension insurance system, the rationality of the tax policy for personal pensions directly affects the policy’s coverage, fairness, and long-term sustainability. This paper takes Pareto optimality, a core concept in welfare economics, as the main analytical framework, and integrates annuity theory, cost-benefit theory, and the multi-pillar pension theory to systematically review the evolution of China’s personal pension policy since 2018, with a focus on analyzing the prominent problems of the current tax policy in terms of incentive structure, fairness, and fiscal sustainability. The study finds that the current annual tax deduction ceiling of 12,000 yuan leads to insufficient incentive coverage and weak willingness to participate among low- and middle-income groups; the uniform 3% tax rate at the withdrawal stage raises fairness concerns; and the tax exemptions at the contribution and investment stages also exert pressure on current fiscal revenue. Based on these findings, this paper proposes an incentive restructuring scheme of “tiered subsidies + dynamic tax incentives”, a cross-cyclical fiscal balance mechanism, and a policy coordination innovation path, aiming to maximize the welfare utility of personal pensions through Pareto improvements, and to provide theoretical references and practical suggestions for improving China’s social security policy.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
郑秉文, 刘鹏. 个人养老金税收优惠模式的局限与改革[J]. 税务研究, 2025(12): 66-74.
|
|
[2]
|
巴曙松, 姜同园, 张可欣, 王鹭妍. 家庭经济压力、未来预期与个人养老金产品投资[J]. 西北人口, 2025, 46(3): 13-24.
|
|
[3]
|
Goodman, L. and Schramm, H.R. (2023) Why Do People Engage in Roth Conversions? National Tax Journal, 76, 561-592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
马笑月, 周延. 税优型个人养老金增大还是减小了收入差距?——基于共同富裕视角[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2026(1): 61-77.
|
|
[5]
|
邵烨铭, 周延. 税负公平视角下第三支柱个人养老金的差异化税优政策选择与再分配效应[J]. 经济体制改革, 2025(6): 131-142.
|
|
[6]
|
范傲, 谢勇才. 个人养老金财税优惠政策跨国比较研究——基于政策“内容-过程-效果”三维框架的分析[J]. 人口与经济, 2026, 47(1): 136-152.
|
|
[7]
|
许鼎, 杨再贵. 金融强国背景下个人养老金财税支持政策优化研究[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2025(2): 47-56.
|
|
[8]
|
白维军, 曲锋. 效率与公平的均衡: 个人养老金制度高质量发展研究[J]. 理论探讨, 2025(1): 165-172.
|
|
[9]
|
朱文佩, 代慧君. 我国个人养老金制度理论奠基、困境剖析与优化策略[J]. 西南金融, 2025(10): 84-96.
|
|
[10]
|
Adelman, S.W. and Cross, M.L. (2010) Comparing a Traditional IRA and a Roth IRA: Theory versus Practice. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 13, 265-277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[11]
|
蒲晓红, 刘成. 我国个人养老金制度实践透视、阻碍因素与策略优化[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2025, 46(4): 118-127.
|