《汽车理论》课程思政的协同育人路径探析
Exploration of Collaborative Education Pathways for Ideological and Political Education in the Course “Automobile Theory”
摘要: 随着新时代高等工程教育改革的不断深化,课程思政已成为落实立德树人根本任务的重要途径。针对当前工科核心基础课《汽车理论》在思政育人中存在的融合碎片化、资源不健全、评价机制单一等痛点,本文提出将科技强国战略目标与课程教学深度融合的协同育人新模式。通过构建三层四维目标体系、重构模块化教学内容、创设三维教学空间以及建立多维闭环评价机制,实现了知识传授、能力培养与价值引领的有机统一。实践表明,该模式有效提升了学生的工程伦理意识、国家自豪感与科技报国使命感,为理工类课程深化课程思政改革提供了可借鉴的创新范式。
Abstract: With the continuous deepening of higher engineering education reform in the new era, curriculum ideology and politics has become a vital approach to fulfilling the fundamental task of fostering virtue through education. Addressing the current pain points in the core engineering course Automobile Theory such as fragmented integration of ideological elements, insufficient resources, and simplistic evaluation mechanisms, this paper proposes a new collaborative education model that deeply integrates the strategic goal of strengthening the country through science and technology into course teaching. By constructing a three-layer and four-dimensional objective system, restructuring modular teaching content, creating a three-dimensional teaching space and establishing a multidimensional closed loop evaluation mechanism, the organic unity of knowledge transfer, ability cultivation and value guidance is achieved. Practical results demonstrate that this model effectively enhances students’ sense of engineering ethics, national pride and mission to serve the country through technology. It provides an innovative and replicable paradigm for deepening curriculum ideology and politics reforms in science and engineering courses.
文章引用:刘永富, 赵玮, 余长柏, 刘海军, 霍官平. 《汽车理论》课程思政的协同育人路径探析[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(5): 443-450. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.145363

参考文献

[1] 教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知[EB/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-06/06/content_5517606.htm, 2026-05-21.
[2] 林健. 面向未来的中国新工科建设[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2017, 38(2): 26-35.
[3] 李志义. 《华盛顿协议》毕业要求框架变化及其启示[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2022(3): 6-14.
[4] 李国利, 杭阿芳. 新工科建设及工程教育专业认证背景下课程思政探索与实践[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2022, 11(8): 3267-3272.
[5] 陆道坤. 课程思政推行中若干核心问题及解决思路——基于专业课程思政的探讨[J]. 思想理论教育, 2018(3): 64-69.
[6] 刘辉, 姬文静, 孔杰, 等. 从课程思政到专业思政: 高校工科专业课程思政研究的主题知识图谱演变规律[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(10): 169-179.
[7] 高德毅, 宗爱东. 课程思政: 有效发挥课堂育人主渠道作用的必然选择[J]. 思想理论教育导刊, 2017(1): 31-34.
[8] 谭晓爽. 课程思政的价值内涵与实践路径探析[J]. 思想政治工作研究, 2018(4): 44-45.
[9] 张大良. 课程思政: 新时期立德树人的根本遵循[J]. 中国高教研究, 2021(1): 5-9.
[10] 吴岩. 建设中国金课[J]. 中国大学教学, 2018(12): 4-9.
[11] 夏小华. 新工科人才的工程素质及其培育路径[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2020, 42(4): 377-382.
[12] 马建辉, 文劲宇. 新工科背景下专业课程思政教学指南[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2022.