建构主义理论下基于5E教学模式的
教学设计——以“直线的倾斜角与斜率”为例
Teaching Design Based on the 5E Model under Constructivist Theory—A Case Study of “The Inclination Angle and Slope of
a Straight Line”
摘要: 中学数学是由概念和命题经推理组成的逻辑体系。数学概念是数学知识体系的基础,对于学生理解数学原理、掌握数学技能以及培养数学思维能力具有重要作用,在中学数学学习中占有重要位置。但在传统的概念教学中,以“一个定义,几项注意”的讲授法占据了主导地位,导致忽视了学生对概念的自主建构、对概念形成过程的经历,不利于学生理解数学概念的本质。5E教学模式注重学生科学概念的构建,故本文从建构主义出发,以《直线的倾斜角与斜率》为例,融入5E教学模式,基于学生已有的知识基础,在吸引、探究、解释、迁移和评价这五大环节中让学生经历对知识的探究和建构,实现学生的主动探索、自主思考和深入学习,增进学生对概念的理解,深化学生对概念本质的认识。借此为高中数学中概念教学的开展提供一定的参考。
Abstract: Middle school mathematics is a logical system composed of concepts and propositions through reasoning. Mathematical concepts are the foundation of the mathematical knowledge system and play a significant role in students’ understanding of mathematical principles, mastery of mathematical skills, and cultivation of mathematical thinking abilities. They hold an important position in middle school mathematics learning. However, in traditional concept teaching, the “one definition, several notes” lecture method has dominated, leading to the neglect of students’ autonomous construction of concepts and their experience of the concept formation process, which is not conducive to students’ understanding of the essence of mathematical concepts. The ultimate goal of the 5E teaching model is to construct students’ scientific concepts. Therefore, this paper starts from constructivism, takes “The Inclination Angle and Slope of a Straight Line” as an example, integrates the 5E teaching model, and based on students’ existing knowledge foundation, allows students to experience the exploration and construction of knowledge in the five major links of engagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration, and evaluation, achieving students’ active exploration, independent thinking, and in-depth learning, enhancing students’ understanding of concepts, and deepening their understanding of the essence of concepts. This provides a certain reference for the implementation of high school mathematics concept teaching.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王健, 李秀菊. 5E教学模式的内涵及其对我国理科教育的启示[J]. 生物学通报, 2012, 47(3): 39-42.
|
|
[2]
|
孔丽丽, 蒋海青. 以学生为主体的5E教学模式研究与实践[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2023(47): 157-160.
|
|
[3]
|
袁天志. 基于“5E”教学模式的初中数学概念教学探索——以“变量与函数”为例[J]. 教师教育论坛, 2022, 35(12): 58-60.
|
|
[4]
|
何克抗. 建构主义的教学模式、教学方法与教学设计[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 1997(5): 74.
|
|
[5]
|
于莹莹. 5E教学模式下“直线斜率与倾斜角”的教学设计[J]. 中学数学月刊, 2021(10): 37-39.
|
|
[6]
|
张隆亿. 指向深度学习的高中数学概念课问题链教学探索[J]. 教学与管理, 2024(19): 35-39.
|
|
[7]
|
郭露露. 传承与融合: 建构主义学习理论对深度教学的启示与建议[J]. 智库时代, 2020(4): 197-198.
|
|
[8]
|
蔡海涛, 林运来. 核心素养下高中数学概念课教学策略[J]. 数学通报, 2019, 58(9): 20-25+66.
|
|
[9]
|
季小明. 关注构建过程, 思想渗透内容——对“直线的倾斜角与斜率”的教学思考[J]. 数学教学通讯, 2018(36): 19-20+27.
|
|
[10]
|
丁泽楠. 概念教学中把握概念的生成机会——以“直线的倾斜角和斜率”教学设计为例[J]. 上海中学数学, 2018(5): 11-12+28.
|
|
[11]
|
吴成军, 张敏. 美国生物学“5E”教学模式的内涵、实例及其本质特征[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2010, 30(6): 108-112.
|
|
[12]
|
邵光华, 章建跃. 数学概念的分类、特征及其教学探讨[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2009, 29(7): 47-51.
|
|
[13]
|
易旦. 基于建构主义理论的数学概念教学模式研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2006.
|