透皮制剂生物等效性豁免策略的研究
Research on the Strategy for Waiving Bioequivalence of Transdermal Preparations
摘要: 透皮给药系统作为药物与医用材料的复合载体,凭借其非侵入性和控释特征,在制剂研发与仿制药注册中占据重要地位。由于皮肤屏障复杂、体内吸收差异显著,传统的人体生物等效性(BE)试验成本高且变异性大。为此,监管机构提出了基于药学一致性(Q1/Q2/Q3)与体外评价替代的“BE豁免”策略。文章系统总结了NMPA、FDA与EMA在透皮及局部制剂豁免路径上的最新监管要求及差异,重点分析了Q1/Q2/Q3一致性评估的科学方法、IVRT与IVPT技术的评价标准,以及PBPK模型在虚拟生物等效性(VBE)预测中的应用进展。研究指出,Q3微结构表征(如CRM、MDRS、流变学、SAXS、AFM等)已成为桥接体外与体内性能的关键技术,而基于机制驱动的PBPK建模则为复杂透皮仿制药提供了新的豁免思路。综合来看,透皮制剂BE豁免的发展正从实验验证向计算机模拟和系统表征相结合的科学评估体系转型,为提高仿制药研发效率与监管科学化提供了重要支撑。
Abstract: Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS), serving as composite carriers of drugs and medical materials, hold an important position in pharmaceutical development and generic drug registration by virtue of their non-invasive nature and controlled-release characteristics. Owing to the complexity of the skin barrier and significant variability in systemic absorption, conventional human bioequivalence (BE) studies are costly and exhibit high variability. To address this, regulatory agencies have established “BE waiver” strategies based on pharmaceutical equivalence (Q1/Q2/Q3 sameness) and advanced in vitro evaluation methods. This article systematically summarizes the latest regulatory requirements and differences among NMPA, FDA, and EMA regarding waiver pathways for transdermal and topical formulations, with emphasis on the scientific methodologies for Q1/Q2/Q3 sameness assessment, evaluation criteria for in vitro release testing (IVRT) and in vitro permeation testing (IVPT), and the advances in applying physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to predict virtual bioequivalence (VBE). The study indicates that Q3 microstructural characterization techniques—such as confocal Raman microscopy (CRM), MDRS, rheology, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and atomic force microscopy (AFM)—have emerged as critical technologies bridging in vitro performance with in vivo outcomes, while mechanism-driven PBPK modeling provides novel waiver strategies for complex transdermal generics. Collectively, the advancement of BE waivers for transdermal formulations is transitioning from experimental validation toward a scientific assessment framework integrating computational simulation with systematic characterization, thereby offering substantial support for enhancing the efficiency of generic drug development and advancing regulatory science.
文章引用:段晓斌, 吕立勋. 透皮制剂生物等效性豁免策略的研究[J]. 药物资讯, 2026, 15(3): 234-242. https://doi.org/10.12677/pi.2026.153026

参考文献

[1] Prausnitz, M.R. and Langer, R. (2008) Transdermal Drug Delivery. Nature Biotechnology, 26, 1261-1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Brown, M.B., Martin, G.P., Jones, S.A. and Akomeah, F.K. (2006) Dermal and Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: Current and Future Prospects. Drug Delivery, 13, 175-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2019) Guidance for Industry: Transdermal and Inhalation Delivery of Drugs and Biologics.
[4] European Medicines Agency (2014) Guideline on Quality of Transdermal Patches.
[5] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2021) Bioequivalence Studies with Pharmacokinetic Endpoints for Drugs Submitted under an ANDA.
[6] International Council for Harmonisation (2009) Q8(R2) Pharmaceutical Development.
[7] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2022) Quality Considerations for Topical Drug Products Submitted under an AN-DA.
[8] Raney, S.G., Franz, T.J., Lehman, P.A., Lionberger, R. and Chen, M. (2015) Pharmacokinetics-Based Approaches for Bioequivalence Evaluation of Topical Dermatological Drug Products. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 54, 1095-1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Williams, A.C. and Barry, B.W. (2012) Penetration Enhancers. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64, 128-137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Zhao, H., Park, D., Kim, S., Lee, C. and Kim, D. (2002) The Effects of Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives and Solubilizers on the Skin Permeation of Testosterone from a Matrix-Type Transdermal Delivery System. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 28, 1125-1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2019) Draft Guidance: Generic Transdermal Drug Products.
[12] Jung, N., Namjoshi, S., Mohammed, Y., Grice, J.E., Benson, H.A.E., Raney, S.G., et al. (2022) Application of Confocal Raman Microscopy for the Characterization of Topical Semisolid Formulations and Their Penetration into Human Skin Ex Vivo. Pharmaceutical Research, 39, 935-948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Kippax, P., Burt, J. and O’Grady, C. (2018) Testing Topicals: Analytical Strategies for the in Vitro Demonstration of Bioequivalence. Pharmaceutical Technology Europe, 30, s31-s36.
[14] Yang, R., Tee, X.Y., Poornachary, S.K., Simone, E. and Chow, P.S. (2025) Influence of Processing and Stabilizer Selection on Microstructure, Stability and Rheology of Emulsion-Based Semisolid Formulations. Pharmaceutics, 17, Article 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Teeranachaideekul, V., Soontaranon, S., Sukhasem, S., Chantasart, D. and Wongrakpanich, A. (2023) Influence of the Emulsifier on Nanostructure and Clinical Application of Liquid Crystalline Emulsions. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 4185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Mohammed, Y.H., Namjoshi, S.N., Jung, N., Windbergs, M., Benson, H.A.E., Grice, J.E., et al. (2024) Topical Semisolid Drug Product Critical Quality Attributes with Relevance to Cutaneous Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics: Part I—Bioequivalence of Acyclovir Topical Creams. Pharmaceutical Research, 41, 1507-1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Shah, V.P., Yacobi, A., Rădulescu, F.Ş., Miron, D.S. and Lane, M.E. (2015) A Science Based Approach to Topical Drug Classification System (TCS). International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 491, 21-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] García-Arieta, A., Gordon, J., Gwaza, L., Merino, V. and Mangas-Sanjuan, V. (2023) Regulatory Requirements for the Development of Second-Entry Semisolid Topical Products in the European Union. Pharmaceutics, 15, Article 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Tsakalozou, E., Alam, K., Babiskin, A. and Zhao, L. (2021) Physiologically‐Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Support Determination of Bioequivalence for Dermatological Drug Products: Scientific and Regulatory Considerations. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 111, 1036-1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Tsakalozou, E., Babiskin, A. and Zhao, L. (2021) Physiologically‐Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Support Bioequivalence and Approval of Generic Products: A Case for Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel, 1%. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, 10, 399-411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] van Osdol, W.W., Novakovic, J., Le Merdy, M., Tsakalozou, E., Ghosh, P., Spires, J., et al. (2024) Predicting Human Dermal Drug Concentrations Using PBPK Modeling and Simulation: Clobetasol Propionate Case Study. AAPS PharmSciTech, 25, Article No. 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Garreau, R., Montange, D., Grillon, A., Jehl, F., Ferry, T., Bourguignon, L., et al. (2022) Daptomycin Physiology-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict Drug Exposure and Pharmacodynamics in Skin and Bone Tissues. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 61, 1443-1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Wojciechowski, J., Malhotra, B.K., Wang, X., Fostvedt, L., Valdez, H. and Nicholas, T. (2022) Population Pharmacokinetics of Abrocitinib in Healthy Individuals and Patients with Psoriasis or Atopic Dermatitis. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 61, 709-723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Sebastia-Saez, D., Burbidge, A., Engmann, J. and Ramaioli, M. (2020) New Trends in Mechanistic Transdermal Drug Delivery Modelling: Towards an Accurate Geometric Description of the Skin Microstructure. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 141, Article ID: 106976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Hamadeh, A., Najjar, A., Troutman, J. and Edginton, A. (2023) Enhancement of Skin Permeability Prediction through PBPK Modeling, Bayesian Inference, and Experiment Design. Pharmaceutics, 15, Article 2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] LaCount, T.D., Zhang, Q., Hao, J., Ghosh, P., Raney, S.G., Talattof, A., et al. (2020) Modeling Temperature-Dependent Dermal Absorption and Clearance for Transdermal and Topical Drug Applications. The AAPS Journal, 22, Article No. 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Zhong, Z., Lian, G., Chen, T. and Yu, Y. (2026) Modelling Transdermal Permeation of Volatiles from Complex Product Formulations. Pharmaceutics, 18, Article 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Benfeldt, E., Hansen, S.H., Vølund, A., Menné, T. and Shah, V.P. (2007) Bioequivalence of Topical Formulations in Humans: Evaluation by Dermal Microdialysis Sampling and the Dermatopharmacokinetic Method. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 127, 170-178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]