SPOC混合式教学与学生学业成绩表现
SPOC Blended Learning and Student Academic Performance
DOI: 10.12677/ve.2026.155234, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李建生, 张柳钦, 刘 晰, 李强谊:广西师范大学经济管理学院,广西 桂林
关键词: SPOC混合式教学学生学业成绩表现双重差分SPOC Blended Learning Student Academic Performance The Difference-in-Difference Model
摘要: 随着信息技术的快速发展,SPOC (Small Private Online Course)作为MOOC的精细化与定制化延伸,已成为高等教育领域重要的混合式教学模式之一,其教学效果亟待评价。本文以2022年广西师范大学经济管理学院随机分班数据应用双重差分方法实证检验实施SPOC混合式教学对学生学业成绩的影响。研究发现:SPOC混合式教学模式提高学生课堂表现及课后作业质量,但降低了出勤率和期末考试成绩。进一步研究发现:SPOC混合式教学对学生学业成绩表现的影响在性别、民族及社会资本等方面存在显著异质性影响。相关的结论和政策建议对更好开展SPOC混合式教学具有重要理论指导和实践引导价值。
Abstract: With the rapid advancement of information technology, SPOC (Small Private Online Course) has emerged as a refined and customized extension of MOOC, becoming one of the key blended teaching models in higher education. Its pedagogical effectiveness warrants urgent evaluation. This study employs a double difference method using randomly assigned class data from the School of Economics and Management at Guangxi Normal University in 2022 to empirically examine the impact of SPOC-based blended teaching on student academic performance. Findings reveal that the SPOC blended learning model enhances students’ classroom performance and the quality of their homework assignments, but reduces attendance rates and final exam scores. Further analysis indicates that the impact of SPOC blended learning on student academic performance exhibits significant heterogeneity across factors such as Gender, Ethnicity, and Social capital. The conclusions and policy recommendations derived from this study provide valuable theoretical guidance and practical direction for the effective implementation of SPOC blended learning.
文章引用:李建生, 张柳钦, 刘晰, 李强谊. SPOC混合式教学与学生学业成绩表现[J]. 职业教育发展, 2026, 15(5): 276-290. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2026.155234

参考文献

[1] 田媛, 席玉婷. 高校混合课堂教学模式的应用研究[J]. 中国大学教学, 2020(8): 78-86+96.
[2] 冯晓英, 王瑞雪, 吴怡君. 国内外混合式教学研究现状述评——基于混合式教学的分析框架[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2018(3): 13-24.
[3] 谢渊. 高校艺术实践类课程线上线下混合教学模式探究[J]. 江苏高教, 2023(8): 99-103.
[4] 于捷. 高校英语线上线下混合式教学模式[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2023, 45(S2): 258-260.
[5] López-Pérez, M.V., Pérez-López, M.C. and Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011) Blended Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Perceptions and Their Relation to Outcomes. Computers & Education, 56, 818-826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Garrison, D.R. and Vaughan, N.D. (2013) Institutional Change and Leadership Associated with Blended Learning Innovation: Two Case Studies. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 24-28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 马峰. 基于数字平台的中学数学混合式学习方式对学习效果影响的实验研究[J]. 上海教育科研, 2024(11): 56-66.
[8] Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2001) Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 7-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Miyazoe, T. and Anderson, T. (2011) Anonymity in Blended Learning: Who Would You Like to Be? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14, 175-187.
[10] Donnelly, R. (2010) Harmonizing Technology with Interaction in Blended Problem-Based Learning. Computers & Education, 54, 350-359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Delialioglo, O. (2016) Student Engagement in Blended Learning Environments with Lecture-Based and Problem-Based Instructional Approaches. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 310-322.
[12] Miyazoe, T. and Anderson, T. (2011) Viewing and Participating: Blog Visualization and Its Learning Outcomes in Blended Learning. 2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, Cincinnati, 17-19 October 2011, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Kayo, Z. and Garrison, D.R. (2008) The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online Course: Under-standing the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive and Teaching Presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3-22.
[14] Vaughan, N. (2015) Designing for an Inquiry Based Approach to Blended and Online Learning. Revista Eletrônica de Educação, 9, 30-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Laurillard, D. (1993) Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technologies. Routledge.
[16] Beck, T., Levine, R. and Levkov, A. (2010) Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States. The Journal of Finance, 65, 1637-1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 刘行, 叶康涛, 陆正飞. 加速折旧政策与企业投资——基于“准自然实验”的经验证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2019, 18(1): 213-234.
[18] Bertrand, M., Duflo, E. and Mullainathan, S. (2004) How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 249-275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 李晓东, 张炳松. 自我效能、价值、课堂环境及学习成绩与学业求助的关系[J]. 心理学报, 1999(4): 435-443.
[20] Feng, W., Tang, J. and Liu, T.X. (2019) Understanding Dropouts in MOOCs. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33, 517-524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C. and Schneider, E. (2013) Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Leuven, 8-13 April 2013, 170-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 包声飞, 黄华炎. 内地西藏班初中生民族认同与主观幸福感的关系——自尊的中介作用[J]. 教育进展, 2023, 13(11): 8837-8844.
[23] 唐辉一, 张崇友, 倪磊, 等. 贵州省苗族大学生民族认同与自尊的关系——自我认同的完全中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2020, 8(5): 284-290+304.
[24] 范洪涛, 刘铁凤, 刘茹菲. “面子”理论跨文化研究述评[J]. 吕梁教育学院学报, 2019, 36(4): 165-167.