近10年脑机接口技术用于神经康复领域的可视化分析
A Visualization Analysis of Brain-Computer Interface Applications in Neurorehabilitation for the Last Decade
DOI: 10.12677/sa.2026.155122, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 郑瑞航, 沈静宜, 张素妍, 蒋建平*:杭州医学院康复学院,浙江 杭州;韩正洋, 杨 曦:杭州医学院临床医学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 脑机接口神经康复可视化分析运动想象脑电图Brain-Computer Interface Rehabilitation Medicine Visualized Analysis Motor Imagery Electroencephalogram
摘要: 目的:对近10年脑机接口技术用于神经康复领域的研究进行可视化分析,系统梳理领域研究现状,识别研究热点并预测其演变趋势,为领域后续发展提供数据支撑。方法:检索中国知网与Web of Science核心合集中近10年脑机接口技术用于神经康复领域的相关文献,通过Citespace 6.4.R1、VOSviewer 1.6.20软件,绘制并分析解读发文量、国家/地区、机构、作者、关键词、研究领域、共被引等维度的可视化图谱。结果:共纳入1333篇文献,其中中文168篇、英文1165篇。该领域国内外年发文量均呈快速增长趋势,研究热度持续攀升。英文文献中,中国的发文量最高,但美国国际合作强度最高,中国需加强产出质量与国际合作。该领域最有影响力的机构是德国图宾根大学(Univ Tubingen),国内西安交通大学、中国科学院等6所机构进入发文量前10,但篇均被引与合作强度普遍偏低;作者层面,图宾根大学Niels Birbaumer教授发文量最高,国内作者间合作存在地域限制,缺乏高影响力学术团体。研究热点以脑卒中、运动想象与脑电图等为核心。结论:脑机接口用于神经康复的前景广阔,未来研究趋势可能会向康复场景精细化、深度融合人工智能等方向发展。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the use of brain-computer interface technology in the field of neurorehabilitation in the last decade; systematically review the current state of research in the field; identify research hotspots and predict their evolutionary trends to provide data support for subsequent development in the field. Methods: Retrieving relevant literature from the CNKI and Web of Science Core Collection over the past decade concerning the application of brain-computer interface technology in the field of neurorehabilitation. Using Citespace 6.4.R1 and VOSviewer 1.6.20 software, we generated and analyzed visualization maps across dimensions including publication volume, country/region, institution, author, keywords, research field, and co-citations. Results: A total of 1333 documents were included, comprising 168 in Chinese and 1165 in English. Both domestic and international publications in this field are experiencing rapid annual growth, with research activity continuing to intensify. In English-language literature, China has the highest volume of publications, but the United States leads in international collaboration intensity. China needs to enhance both the quality of its research outputs and its international cooperation efforts. The most influential institution in this field is the University of Tubingen. Six domestic institutions, including Xi’an Jiaotong University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, ranked among the top 10 in publication volume, but their average citations per paper and collaborative intensity remained generally low. Among the authors, Professor Niels Birbaumer of the University of Tubingen has the highest number of posts. Collaboration among domestic authors faces geographical constraints and lacks high-impact academic networks. Key terms centered on stroke, motor imagery, and electroencephalogram (EEG). Conclusion: Brain-computer interfaces hold great promise for neural rehabilitation. Future research trends may evolve toward greater refinement in rehabilitation scenarios and deeper integration with artificial intelligence.
文章引用:郑瑞航, 韩正洋, 沈静宜, 张素妍, 杨曦, 蒋建平. 近10年脑机接口技术用于神经康复领域的可视化分析[J]. 统计学与应用, 2026, 15(5): 245-260. https://doi.org/10.12677/sa.2026.155122

参考文献

[1] Steinmetz, J.D., Seeher, K.M., Schiess, N., Nichols, E., Cao, B., Servili, C., et al. (2024) Global, Regional, and National Burden of Disorders Affecting the Nervous System, 1990-2021: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Neurology, 23, 344-381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Hay, S.I., Ong, K.L., Santomauro, D.F., A, B., Aalipour, M.A., Aalruz, H., et al. (2025) Burden of 375 Diseases and Injuries, Risk-Attributable Burden of 88 Risk Factors, and Healthy Life Expectancy in 204 Countries and Territories, Including 660 Subnational Locations, 1990-2023: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. The Lancet, 406, 1873-1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Gutierrez-Martinez, J., Mercado-Gutierrez, J.A., Carvajal-Gámez, B.E., Rosas-Trigueros, J.L. and Contreras-Martinez, A.E. (2021) Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Visual Evoked Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces for Motor Rehabilitation Applications: Systematic Review and Future Directions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, Article 772837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Lebedev, M.A. and Nicolelis, M.A.L. (2017) Brain-Machine Interfaces: From Basic Science to Neuroprostheses and Neurorehabilitation. Physiological Reviews, 97, 767-837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Gao, W., Cui, Z., Yu, Y., Mao, J., Xu, J., Ji, L., et al. (2022) Application of a Brain-Computer Interface System with Visual and Motor Feedback in Limb and Brain Functional Rehabilitation after Stroke: Case Report. Brain Sciences, 12, Article 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 葛祎, 仲颖, 洪文军, 等. 脑机接口在中枢神经系统疾病康复中的应用[J]. 康复学报, 2025, 35(4): 393-398.
[7] Li, F., Zhang, D., Chen, J., Tang, K., Li, X. and Hou, Z. (2023) Research Hotspots and Trends of Brain-Computer Interface Technology in Stroke: A Bibliometric Study and Visualization Analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, Article 1243151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Gao, X., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Liu, B. and Gao, S. (2025) Brain-Computer Interface—A Brain-In-The-Loop Communication System. Proceedings of the IEEE, 113, 478-511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Eliseyev, A. and Aksenova, T. (2019) Personalized Adaptive Instruction Design (PAID) for Brain-Computer Interface Using Reinforcement Learning and Deep Learning: Simulated Data Study. Brain-Computer Interfaces, 6, 36-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Teng, J., Cho, S. and Lee, S. (2025) Tri-Manual Interaction in Hybrid BCI-VR Systems: Integrating Gaze, EEG Control for Enhanced 3D Object Manipulation. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 19, Article 1628968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Zhang, C., Yang, X., Wan, D., Ma, Q., Yin, P., Zhou, M., et al. (2025) Burden of Neurological Disorders in China and Its Provinces, 1990-2021: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Med, 6, Article ID: 100692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Chen, S., Chen, M., Wang, X., Liu, X., Liu, B. and Ming, D. (2025) Brain-Computer Interfaces in 2023-2024. Brain‐X, 3, e70024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242-253.
[14] Hallett, M. (19) 9Movement-Related Cortical Potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 34, 5-13.
[15] Shibasaki, H. and Hallett, M. (2006) What Is the Bereitschaftspotential? Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 2341-2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Colebatch, J.G. (2007) Bereitschaftspotential and Movement‐Related Potentials: Origin, Significance, and Application in Disorders of Human Movement. Movement Disorders, 22, 601-610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Remsik, A.B., Gjini, K., Williams, L., van Kan, P.L.E., Gloe, S., Bjorklund, E., et al. (2021) Ipsilesional Mu Rhythm Desynchronization Correlates with Improvements in Affected Hand Grip Strength and Functional Connectivity in Sensorimotor Cortices Following BCI-FES Intervention for Upper Extremity in Stroke Survivors. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, Article 725645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Takemi, M., Masakado, Y., Liu, M. and Ushiba, J. (2013) Event-Related Desynchronization Reflects Downregulation of Intracortical Inhibition in Human Primary Motor Cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110, 1158-1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Olejniczak, P. (2006) Neurophysiologic Basis of EEG. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 23, 186-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Elashmawi, W.H., Ayman, A., Antoun, M., Mohamed, H., Mohamed, S.E., Amr, H., et al. (2024) A Comprehensive Review on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-Based Machine and Deep Learning Algorithms for Stroke Rehabilitation. Applied Sciences, 14, Article 6347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Ahn, M., Cho, H., Ahn, S. and Jun, S.C. (2013) High Theta and Low Alpha Powers May Be Indicative of BCI-Illiteracy in Motor Imagery. PLOS ONE, 8, e80886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Thompson, M.C. (2019) Critiquing the Concept of BCI Illiteracy. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 1217-1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Wierzgała, P., Zapała, D., Wojcik, G.M. and Masiak, J. (2018) Most Popular Signal Processing Methods in Motor-Imagery BCI: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 12, Article 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Gutierrez-Martinez, J., Mercado-Gutierrez, J.A., Carvajal-Gámez, B.E., Rosas-Trigueros, J.L. and Contreras-Martinez, A.E. (2021) Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Visual Evoked Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces for Motor Rehabilitation Applications: Systematic Review and Future Directions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, Article 772837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Popović, D.B. (2014) Advances in Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES). Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 24, 795-802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Ren, C., Li, X., Gao, Q., Pan, M., Wang, J., Yang, F., et al. (2024) The Effect of Brain-Computer Interface Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Training on Rehabilitation of Upper Limb after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 18, Article 1438095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., Zhou, J., Zhang, Z., Feng, M. and Liu, Y. (2025) Advances in Brain-Computer Interface Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Upper Limb Recovery after Stroke. Brain Research Bulletin, 226, Article ID: 111354. Z., Fong, K.N.K., Zhang, J.J., Chan, J. and Ting, K.H. (2020) Immediate and Long-Term Effects of BCI-Based Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremity after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 17, Article No. 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Forenzo, D., Zhang, Y., Wittenberg, G.F. and He, B. (2025) Continuous Reaching and Grasping with a BCI Controlled Robotic Arm in Healthy and Stroke-Affected Individuals. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 33, 3888-3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Serafini, E.R.d.S., Guerrero-Mendez, C.D., Blanco-Diaz, C.F., da Silva Fiorin, F., de Albuquerque, T.S., A. Dantas, A.F.O., et al. (2025) Cortical Modulation through Robotic Gait Training with Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Enhances Bladder Function in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 34633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Lau, C.C.Y., Yuan, K., Wong, P.C.M., Chu, W.C.W., Leung, T.W., Wong, W., et al. (2021) Modulation of Functional Connectivity and Low-Frequency Fluctuations after Brain-Computer Interface-Guided Robot Hand Training in Chronic Stroke: A 6-Month Follow-Up Study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, Article 611064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Alimardani, M., Nishio, S. and Ishiguro, H. (2016) The Importance of Visual Feedback Design in BCIS; from Embodiment to Motor Imagery Learning. PLOS ONE, 11, e0161945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Ben Abdallah, I., Bouteraa, Y. and Alotaibi, A. (2025) AI-Driven Hybrid Rehabilitation: Synergizing Robotics and Electrical Stimulation for Upper-Limb Recovery after Stroke. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 13, Article 1619247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Jeannerod, M. (2001) Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition. NeuroImage, 14, S103-S109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Li, M., Liu, Y., Wu, Y., Liu, S., Jia, J. and Zhang, L. (2014) Neurophysiological Substrates of Stroke Patients with Motor Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface Training. International Journal of Neuroscience, 124, 403-415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Ma, Z., Wu, J., Cao, Z., Hua, X., Zheng, M., Xing, X., et al. (2024) Motor Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface Rehabilitation Programs Enhance Upper Extremity Performance and Cortical Activation in Stroke Patients. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 21, Article No. 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] 高诺, 张慧, 高志栋, 等. 基于脑机接口技术的上下肢康复系统研究[J]. 生物医学工程研究, 2021, 40(2): 166-171.
[37] Krueger, J., Krauth, R., Reichert, C., Perdikis, S., Vogt, S., Huchtemann, T., et al. (2024) Hebbian Plasticity Induced by Temporally Coincident BCI Enhances Post-Stroke Motor Recovery. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 18700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] 贾杰. 老年卒中的感知-运动互调控[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(10): 1037-1039.
[39] Sato, T., Nakamura, Y., Takeda, A. and Ueno, M. (2021) Lesion Area in the Cerebral Cortex Determines the Patterns of Axon Rewiring of Motor and Sensory Corticospinal Tracts after Stroke. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, Article 737034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Tong, Y., Pendy, J.T., Li, W.A., Du, H., Zhang, T., Geng, X., et al. (2017) Motor Imagery-Based Rehabilitation: Potential Neural Correlates and Clinical Application for Functional Recovery of Motor Deficits after Stroke. Aging and disease, 8, 364-371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Sitaram, R., Ros, T., Stoeckel, L., Haller, S., Scharnowski, F., Lewis-Peacock, J., et al. (2017) Closed-Loop Brain Training: The Science of Neurofeedback. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 86-100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Su, F. and Xu, W. (2020) Enhancing Brain Plasticity to Promote Stroke Recovery. Frontiers in Neurology, 11, Article 554089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Cantillo-Negrete, J., Rodríguez-García, M.E., Carrillo-Mora, P., Arias-Carrión, O., Ortega-Robles, E., Galicia-Alvarado, M.A., et al. (2025) The Rehand-BCI Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Brain-Computer Interface for Upper Extremity Stroke Neurorehabilitation. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 19, Article 1579988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Norman, S.L., Wolpaw, J.R. and Reinkensmeyer, D.J. (2022) Targeting Neuroplasticity to Improve Motor Recovery after Stroke: An Artificial Neural Network Model. Brain Communications, 4, fcac264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] 唐春花, 郭露, 张莉莉. 2025年全球卒中报告数据解读: 卒中疾病负担的梯度演变与精准治理[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2025, 24(5): 485-497.
[46] Ali, U., Khan, J.A., Ahsan, M.T., Altaf, B., Azreen, S., Alamu, O.S., et al. (2025) Brain-Computer Interfaces in the Rehabilitation of Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy. Cureus, 17, e94833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[47] 万春利, 邱怀德, 王雪, 等. 脑机接口对脑卒中患者功能恢复影响的meta分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2022, 37(11): 1535-1540, 1550.
[48] 韩诗雨, 解益, 董安琴. 基于脑机接口的功能性电刺激改善卒中后患者上肢功能的meta分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2024, 39(12): 1862-1869.
[49] Anjum, A., Yazid, M.D., Fauzi Daud, M., Idris, J., Ng, A.M.H., Selvi Naicker, A., et al. (2020) Spinal Cord Injury: Pathophysiology, Multimolecular Interactions, and Underlying Recovery Mechanisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, Article 7533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[50] Gladstone, D.J., Danells, C.J. and Black, S.E. (2002) The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 16, 232-240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Griggs, W.S., Norman, S.L., Deffieux, T., Segura, F., Osmanski, B., Chau, G., et al. (2024) Decoding Motor Plans Using a Closed-Loop Ultrasonic Brain-Machine Interface. Nature Neuroscience, 27, 196-207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[52] Rabut, C., Norman, S.L., Griggs, W.S., Russin, J.J., Jann, K., Christopoulos, V., et al. (2024) Functional Ultrasound Imaging of Human Brain Activity through an Acoustically Transparent Cranial Window. Science Translational Medicine, 16, eadj3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[53] Sun, Y., Chen, X., Liu, B., Liang, L., Wang, Y., Gao, S., et al. (2025) Signal Acquisition of Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Medical-Engineering Crossover Perspective Review. Fundamental Research, 5, 3-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[54] Ghosh, S., Máthé, D., Harishita, P.B., Sankarapillai, P., Mohan, A., Bhuvanakantham, R., et al. (2024) Review of Multimodal Data Acquisition Approaches for Brain-Computer Interfaces. BioMed, 4, 548-587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[55] Tibrewal, N., Leeuwis, N. and Alimardani, M. (2022) Classification of Motor Imagery EEG Using Deep Learning Increases Performance in Inefficient BCI Users. PLOS ONE, 17, e0268880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[56] Zhang, T., Li, X., Hu, X., Zhou, Z., Mu, Q., Chai, X., et al. (2025) EEG‐Based Deep Learning Model for Hyper-Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Detection in Mice. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 31, e70592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[57] Hazrati, H. and Daliri, M.R. (2025) Decoding Covert Visual Attention of Electroencephalography Signals Using Continuous Wavelet Transform and Deep Learning Approach. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 37503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[58] Hao, Y. and Cheng, S. (2025) Motor Imagery EEG Classification Method Using 3D CNN and LSTM for Rehabilitation Application. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 19, Article No. 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[59] Yue, J., Xiao, X., Wang, K., Yi, W., Jung, T., Xu, M., et al. (2025) Augmenting Electroencephalogram Transformer for Steady-State Visually Evoked Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces. Cyborg and Bionic Systems, 6, Article ID: 0379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[60] Kunz, E.M., Abramovich Krasa, B., Kamdar, F., Avansino, D.T., Hahn, N., Yoon, S., et al. (2025) Inner Speech in Motor Cortex and Implications for Speech Neuroprostheses. Cell, 188, 4658-4673.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[61] Padfield, N., Zabalza, J., Zhao, H., Masero, V. and Ren, J. (2019) EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces Using Motor-Imagery: Techniques and Challenges. Sensors, 19, Article 1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[62] Qu, H., Zeng, F., Tang, Y., Shi, B., Wang, Z., Chen, X., et al. (2024) The Clinical Effects of Brain-Computer Interface with Robot on Upper-Limb Function for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 19, 30-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[63] Shou, Y., Wang, X. and Yang, G. (2023) Verum versus Sham Brain-Computer Interface on Upper Limb Function Recovery after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Medicine, 102, e34148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[64] Tonin, A., Semprini, M., Kiper, P. and Mantini, D. (2025) Brain-Computer Interfaces for Stroke Motor Rehabilitation. Bioengineering, 12, Article 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef