基于投资者异质性的数字资产价格波动稳定性研究——基于ABM仿真实验
Research on Price Volatility Stability of Digital Assets Based on Investor Heterogeneity—An ABM Simulation Experiment
摘要: 比特币市场高杠杆与投机情绪导致的极端波动性已成为数字金融稳定性的核心挑战。本文基于计算实验金融学范式,利用NetLogo平台构建包含趋势追踪型与价值回归型两类异质投资者的ABM模型,通过超额需求价格形成机制、杠杆清算与止损触发规则,模拟外部冲击下的价格演化过程。基准参数设定初始价格10,000美元,趋势型占比40%~70%,杠杆倍数1.2~4.0。仿真结果显示:当杠杆 ≥ 4且趋势型投资者占比 ≥ 70%时,15%的外部冲击可被放大至80%以上最大回撤,形成“清算螺旋”与“流动性黑洞”;价值型投资者占比越高,市场修复弹性越强。研究揭示杠杆内生性与异质性结构是比特币闪崩的根本动力。建议监管部门实施动态杠杆上限、多级熔断与延迟清算机制。本文为加密货币市场稳定性监管提供了计算实验依据。
Abstract: The extreme volatility in the digital asset market, driven by high leverage and speculative sentiment, has become a core challenge to digital financial stability. This paper constructs an Agent-Based Model (ABM) using the NetLogo platform based on the computational experimental finance paradigm. The model incorporates two types of heterogeneous investors: trend-following agents (who chase price trends with high leverage and exhibit herd behavior) and value-returning agents (who trade rationally based on intrinsic value and act as market stabilizers). Price formation follows an excess-demand mechanism, combined with leverage liquidation and stop-loss triggering rules. Baseline parameters include an initial price of $10,000, trend-follower ratio ranging from 40% to 70%, and leverage multiplier from 1.2 to 4.0. Simulation results demonstrate that when leverage exceeds 4 and trend-followers account for 70% or more, a mere 15% external shock can be amplified to over 80% maximum drawdown, forming a “liquidation spiral” and “liquidity black hole”. Higher proportions of value-returning investors significantly enhance market resilience and recovery elasticity. The study reveals that endogenous leverage structure and investor heterogeneity are the root causes of Bitcoin-style flash crashes. Policy recommendations include implementing dynamic leverage caps, multi-level circuit breakers, and delayed liquidation mechanisms. This research provides computational experimental evidence for regulating the stability of cryptocurrency markets.
文章引用:董乐尧. 基于投资者异质性的数字资产价格波动稳定性研究——基于ABM仿真实验[J]. 建模与仿真, 2026, 15(5): 239-248. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2026.155087

参考文献

[1] CoinDesk (2025) Bitcoin 2025 Year-End Review: Flash Crashes and Recoveries.
[2] Reuters (2025) Bitcoin’s 2025 Rollercoaster: Tariffs and Volatility.
[3] The Guardian (2025) Cryptocurrency Slump Erases 2025 Gains Amid Trump Tariffs.
[4] Tesfatsion, L. (2002) Agent-Based Computational Economics: A Constructive Approach. Computational Economics, 20, 1-35.
[5] LeBaron, B. (2006) Chapter 24 Agent-Based Computational Finance. In: Handbook of Computational Economics, Elsevier, 1187-1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Hommes, C.H. (2006) Chapter 23 Heterogeneous Agent Models in Economics and Finance. In: Handbook of Computational Economics, Elsevier, 1109-1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Wang, L. (2025) Heterogeneity in Crypto Markets: Lessons from 2025 Tariffs. Journal of China Finance, 15, 112-130.
[8] CryptoRank (2025) Biggest Crypto Crashes of 2025.
[9] OANDA (2025) Bitcoin Price History (2009-2025).
[10] Smith, J., et al. (2025) Agent-Based Modeling of Bitcoin Flash Crashes in 2025. Journal of Computational Finance, 28, 45-67.
[11] Qin, K., Zhou, L., Gamito, P., Jovanovic, P. and Gervais, A. (2021). An Empirical Study of Defi Liquidations: Incentives, Risks, and Instabilities. Proceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference, Virtual Event, 2-4 November 2021, 336-350.[CrossRef
[12] Fratrič, P., Sileno, G., Klous, S. and van Engers, T. (2022) Manipulation of the Bitcoin Market: An Agent-Based Study. Financial Innovation, 8, Article No. 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Tian, P. (2025) Liquidation Mechanisms and Price Impacts in DeFi. Bank of Canada Working Paper.
[14] Chaudhary, A. and Pinna, D. (2022) A Multi-Asset, Agent-Based Approach Applied to DeFi Lending. arXiv:2211.08870.
[15] Bokhari, A. (2025) Unpacking Herding in Crypto Markets: An Agent-Based Study of True and Spurious Herding Dynamics. Procedia Computer Science, 274, 463-476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Cavalli, F., Naimzada, A., Pecora, N. and Pireddu, M. (2021) Market Sentiment and Heterogeneous Agents in an Evolutive Financial Model. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 31, 1189-1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef