基于Transformer-CNN混合架构的地下水流预测替代模型研究
A Surrogate Model for Groundwater Flow Prediction Based on a Transformer-CNN Hybrid Architecture
DOI: 10.12677/ag.2026.165066, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 彭朝阳, 夏学敏*:中国地质大学(北京)地下水循环与环境演化教育部重点实验室,北京;上海理工大学环境与建筑学院土木工程系,上海
关键词: 地下水模拟替代模型Transformer卷积神经网络时空预测Groundwater Simulation Surrogate Model Transformer Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Spatiotemporal Prediction
摘要: 地下水数值模拟是水资源管理的重要工具,但传统物理模型存在计算成本高、参数化复杂等局限性。本文提出一种新型的Transformer-CNN混合替代模型,通过引入相对位置编码机制增强Transformer对序列长期依赖关系的捕捉能力,并结合卷积神经网络(CNN)提取空间特征,以高效预测地下水头场的时空演化。模型采用多尺度特征融合与跨模态注意力机制,整合渗透系数场、抽水量等物理先验知识,提升预测精度与泛化能力。基于澳大利亚东南部典型含水层的数值算例验证表明,该模型在测试集上的决定系数(R2)达0.993,均方误差(MSE)为0.0011,结构相似性指数(SSIM)为0.989,且训练效率较基准模型(DSCNN-GRU)提升25.5%。实验结果表明,该模型在复杂水文地质条件下显著优于现有方法,尤其擅长捕捉长期时空依赖关系与局部异质性特征,为地下水动态预测提供了一种高精度、高效率的解决方案。
Abstract: Groundwater numerical simulation is a vital tool for water resources management; however, conventional physics-based models face limitations such as high computational costs and complex parameterization. This paper proposes a novel Transformer-CNN hybrid surrogate model for efficiently predicting the spatiotemporal evolution of hydraulic head fields. The model enhances the Transformer’s ability to capture long-term dependencies in sequences by introducing a relative position encoding mechanism and leveraging Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to extract spatial features. It incorporates multi-scale feature fusion and cross-modal attention mechanisms to integrate physical prior knowledge, such as hydraulic conductivity fields and pumping rates, thereby improving prediction accuracy and generalization capability. Validation based on a numerical case study of a typical aquifer in southeastern Australia demonstrates that the model achieves a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.993, a Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.0011, and a Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) of 0.989 on the test set. Furthermore, the training efficiency is improved by 25.5% compared to the baseline model (DSCNN-GRU). Experimental results indicate that the proposed model significantly outperforms existing methods under complex hydrogeological conditions, particularly excelling in capturing long-term spatiotemporal dependencies and local heterogeneous features. It provides a high-accuracy and efficient solution for dynamic groundwater prediction.
文章引用:彭朝阳, 夏学敏. 基于Transformer-CNN混合架构的地下水流预测替代模型研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2026, 16(5): 717-731. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2026.165066

参考文献

[1] Luo, J., Ma, X., Ji, Y., Li, X., Song, Z. and Lu, W. (2023) Review of Machine Learning-Based Surrogate Models of Groundwater Contaminant Modeling. Environmental Research, 238, Article 117268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Müller, J., Park, J., Sahu, R., Varadharajan, C., Arora, B., Faybishenko, B., et al. (2021) Surrogate Optimization of Deep Neural Networks for Groundwater Predictions. Journal of Global Optimization, 81, 203-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Taccari, M.L., Nuttall, J., Chen, X., Wang, H., Minnema, B. and Jimack, P.K. (2022) Attention U-Net as a Surrogate Model for Groundwater Prediction. Advances in Water Resources, 163, Article 104169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Ali, A.S.A., Jazaei, F., Clement, T.P. and Waldron, B. (2024) Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Groundwater Flow Modeling: Advantages and Future Directions. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 25, Article 101172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Secci, D., A. Godoy, V. and Gómez-Hernández, J.J. (2024) Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Transient Unconfined Groundwater Flow. Computers & Geosciences, 182, Article 105494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Zhan, Y., Guo, Z., Yan, B., Chen, K., Chang, Z., Babovic, V., et al. (2024) Physics-Informed Identification of PDEs with LASSO Regression, Examples of Groundwater-Related Equations. Journal of Hydrology, 638, Article 131504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Sun, J., Hu, L., Li, D., Sun, K. and Yang, Z. (2022) Data-Driven Models for Accurate Groundwater Level Prediction and Their Practical Significance in Groundwater Management. Journal of Hydrology, 608, Article 127630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Kouadri, S., Pande, C.B., Panneerselvam, B., Moharir, K.N. and Elbeltagi, A. (2022) Prediction of Irrigation Groundwater Quality Parameters Using ANN, LSTM, and MLR Models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 21067-21091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Zhao, Y., Yang, L., Pan, H., Li, Y., Shao, Y., Li, J., et al. (2025) Spatio-Temporal Prediction of Groundwater Vulnerability Based on CNN-LSTM Model with Self-Attention Mechanism: A Case Study in Hetao Plain, Northern China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 153, 128-142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bai, T. and Tahmasebi, P. (2023) Graph Neural Network for Groundwater Level Forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 616, Article 128792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Elmorsy, M., El‐Dakhakhni, W. and Zhao, B. (2022) Generalizable Permeability Prediction of Digital Porous Media via a Novel Multi‐Scale 3D Convolutional Neural Network. Water Resources Research, 58, e2021WR031454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Vu, M.T., Jardani, A., Massei, N. and Fournier, M. (2021) Reconstruction of Missing Groundwater Level Data by Using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Deep Neural Network. Journal of Hydrology, 597, Article 125776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Nan, T., Cao, W., Wang, Z., Gao, Y., Zhao, L., Sun, X., et al. (2023) Evaluation of Shallow Groundwater Dynamics after Water Supplement in North China Plain Based on Attention-GRU Model. Journal of Hydrology, 625, Article 130085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Ghasemlounia, R., Gharehbaghi, A., Ahmadi, F. and Saadatnejadgharahassanlou, H. (2021) Developing a Novel Framework for Forecasting Groundwater Level Fluctuations Using Bi-Directional Long Short-Term Memory (Bilstm) Deep Neural Network. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 191, Article 106568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Yu, X., Cui, T., Sreekanth, J., Mangeon, S., Doble, R., Xin, P., et al. (2020) Deep Learning Emulators for Groundwater Contaminant Transport Modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 590, Article 125351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Morgan, L.K., Harrington, N., Werner, A.D., Hutson, J.L., Woods, J. and Knowling, M.J. (2016) South East Regional Water Balance Project-Phase 2 Development of a Regional Groundwater Flow Model. Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series, Goyder Institute for Water Research.
[17] Li, X., Peng, C., Zhao, Y. and Xia, X. (2025) A Hybrid DSCNN-GRU Based Surrogate Model for Transient Groundwater Flow Prediction. Applied Sciences, 15, Article 4576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef