灰岩溶解对锑静态吸附与界面固定的影响
Effects of Limestone Dissolution on Static Adsorption and Interfacial Fixation of Antimony
DOI: 10.12677/ag.2026.165069, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 黄仕龙:桂林理工大学广西环境污染控制理论与技术重点实验室,广西 桂林;陈 盟*:桂林理工大学广西环境污染控制理论与技术重点实验室,广西 桂林;桂林理工大学流域保护与绿色发展广西高校工程研究中心,广西 桂林;桂林理工大学广西高校碳排放与污染物协同控制重点实验室,广西 桂林
关键词: 岩溶土壤灰岩溶解静态吸附界面固定机制Karst Soil Limestone Dissolution Antimony Static Adsorption Interfacial Fixation Mechanism
摘要: 研究选取广西阳朔典型铅锌矿流域土壤和灰岩,采用静态批实验,结合XRD和FTIR表征,探究了Sb (III)和Sb (V)在土壤–灰岩混合介质中的吸附行为与固定机制。结果表明:灰岩掺入对Sb (III)和Sb (V)的固定能力存在明显的比例效应,90%土壤 + 10%灰岩混合介质对两种价态锑的吸附容量最高,其固定优势并非随灰岩比例增加而持续增强。适量灰岩(10%)的掺入能通过增强碳酸盐缓冲、提供Ca2+并扩展反应界面以促进固定;而过量掺入(30%)则会稀释土壤中铁锰氧化物等高活性组分,且高浓度 HC O 3 Sb ( OH ) 6 发生竞争吸附,导致固定能力下降。环境因子(pH、Ca2+和富里酸)显著调控Sb的界面分配,且Sb (V)与Sb (III)的响应行为因形态差异而不同。XRD和FTIR表征表明,吸附后主体矿物相稳定,未生成新生含Sb晶相,固定机制以表面作用为主导,主要涉及方解石及低结晶Fe/Mn活性组分表面络合、配体交换及界面低结晶沉积。本研究为认识岩溶区土壤中不同价态Sb的吸附差异及其固定机制提供了实验依据。
Abstract: This study selected soils and limestone from a typical lead-zinc mining watershed in Yangshuo, Guangxi, and employed static batch experiments combined with X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) to investigate the adsorption behavior and fixation mechanisms of Sb (III) and Sb (V) in a soil-limestone mixed medium. The results showed a clear proportion-dependent effect of limestone amendment on Sb (III) and Sb (V) immobilization, with the 90% soil + 10% limestone mixture exhibiting the highest adsorption capacity for both valence states; this advantage did not increase continuously with limestone proportion. An appropriate addition (10%) promoted immobilization by enhancing carbonate buffering, supplying Ca2+, and expanding the reactive interfacial area. In contrast, excessive addition (30%) diluted highly reactive soil components such as Fe/Mn oxides and induced competitive adsorption between elevated HC O 3 and Sb ( OH ) 6 , thereby reducing immobilization capacity. Environmental factors (pH, Ca2+, fulvic acid) significantly regulated Sb interfacial partitioning, with Sb (V) and Sb (III) responding differently due to speciation differences. XRD and FTIR analyses indicated that major mineral phases remained stable post-adsorption without newly formed Sb-bearing crystalline phases, suggesting that Sb immobilization was dominated by surface processes—primarily surface complexation, ligand exchange, and interfacial poorly crystalline precipitation on calcite and low-crystallinity Fe/Mn reactive components. This study provides an experimental basis for understanding differential adsorption and fixation mechanisms of antimony valence states in karst soils.
文章引用:黄仕龙, 陈盟. 灰岩溶解对锑静态吸附与界面固定的影响[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2026, 16(5): 759-771. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2026.165069

参考文献

[1] Bolan, N., Kumar, M., Singh, E., Kumar, A., Singh, L., Kumar, S., et al. (2022) Antimony Contamination and Its Risk Management in Complex Environmental Settings: A Review. Environment International, 158, Article ID: 106908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Fu, X., Xie, X., Charlet, L. and He, J. (2023) A Review on Distribution, Biogeochemistry of Antimony in Water and Its Environmental Risk. Journal of Hydrology, 625, Article ID: 130043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Zhang, Y., Ding, C., Gong, D., Deng, Y., Huang, Y., Zheng, J., et al. (2021) A Review of the Environmental Chemical Behavior, Detection and Treatment of Antimony. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 24, Article ID: 102026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Yu, Z., Li, X., Wu, P., Han, Z., Zhu, J., Chen, M., et al. (2025) Effect of Lead Zinc Mineralization Area on Heavy Metals Accumulation and Geochemical Fractions of Agricultural Soils in Southwest China. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 19196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Zhou, J., Liu, Z., Li, Z., Xie, R., Jiang, X., Cheng, J., et al. (2025) Heavy Metals Release in Lead-Zinc Tailings: Effects of Weathering and Acid Rain. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 483, Article ID: 136645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Ferrari, C., White, K.B., Ptacek, C.J. and Blowes, D.W. (2026) Tracing Arsenic and Antimony in Mining-Impacted Environments: New Insights from Antimony Isotopes. Chemical Geology, 707, Article ID: 123271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 潘泳兴, 陈盟, 王櫹橦. 典型铅锌矿流域土壤重金属累积与分布的影响因素分析[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(11): 6071-6084.
[8] He, M., Wang, N., Long, X., Zhang, C., Ma, C., Zhong, Q., et al. (2019) Antimony Speciation in the Environment: Recent Advances in Understanding the Biogeochemical Processes and Ecological Effects. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 75, 14-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 马祥爱, 秦俊梅, 张亚尼. 锑在不同土壤中的解吸行为比较[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(8): 1528-1534.
[10] Wang, K., Zhang, C., Chen, H., Yue, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, M., et al. (2019) Karst Landscapes of China: Patterns, Ecosystem Processes and Services. Landscape Ecology, 34, 2743-2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Campanale, C., Losacco, D., Triozzi, M., Massarelli, C. and Uricchio, V.F. (2022) An Overall Perspective for the Study of Emerging Contaminants in Karst Aquifers. Resources, 11, Article 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Kalhor, K., Ghasemizadeh, R., Rajic, L. and Alshawabkeh, A. (2019) Assessment of Groundwater Quality and Remediation in Karst Aquifers: A Review. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 8, 104-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Bonto, M., Eftekhari, A.A. and Nick, H.M. (2022) Electrokinetic Behavior of Artificial and Natural Calcites: A Review of Experimental Measurements and Surface Complexation Models. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 301, Article ID: 102600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Luquot, L., Roetting, T.S. and Carrera, J. (2014) Characterization of Flow Parameters and Evidence of Pore Clogging during Limestone Dissolution Experiments. Water Resources Research, 50, 6305-6321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Oberhelman, A., Martin, J.B. and Flint, M.K. (2024) Sources of Limestone Dissolution from Surface Water-Groundwater Interaction in the Carbonate Critical Zone. Chemical Geology, 662, Article ID: 122229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Yan, L., Chan, T. and Jing, C. (2022) Mechanistic Study for Antimony Adsorption and Precipitation on Hematite Facets. Environmental Science & Technology, 56, 3138-3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Mu, Z., Xu, D. and Fu, R. (2022) Insight into the Adsorption Behaviors of Antimony onto Soils Using Multidisciplinary Characterization. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, Article 4254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Vithanage, M., Rajapaksha, A.U., Dou, X., Bolan, N.S., Yang, J.E. and Ok, Y.S. (2013) Surface Complexation Modeling and Spectroscopic Evidence of Antimony Adsorption on Iron-Oxide-Rich Red Earth Soils. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 406, 217-224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Chen, H., Hou, M., He, Z., Liang, Y., Xu, J. and Tan, W. (2023) Adsorption Behavior of Soil Fulvic Acid on Crystal Faces of Kaolinite and Goethite: Described by CD-MUSIC Model. Science of the Total Environment, 903, Article ID: 165806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Fan, Y., Zheng, C., Liu, H., He, C., Shen, Z. and Zhang, T.C. (2020) Effect of Ph on the Adsorption of Arsenic(v) and Antimony(v) by the Black Soil in Three Systems: Performance and Mechanism. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 191, Article ID: 110145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Fan, Y., Zheng, C., Huo, A., Wang, Q., Shen, Z., Xue, Z., et al. (2019) Investigating the Binding Properties between Antimony(v) and Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM) under Different pH Conditions during the Soil Sorption Process Using Fluorescence and FTIR Spectroscopy. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 181, 34-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Garau, G., Lauro, G.P., Diquattro, S., Garau, M. and Castaldi, P. (2019) Sb(v) Adsorption and Desorption onto Ferrihydrite: Influence of Ph and Competing Organic and Inorganic Anions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 27268-27280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Al-Ghouti, M.A. and Da’ana, D.A. (2020) Guidelines for the Use and Interpretation of Adsorption Isotherm Models: A Review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 393, Article ID: 122383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Raji, Z., Karim, A., Karam, A. and Khalloufi, S. (2023) Adsorption of Heavy Metals: Mechanisms, Kinetics, and Applications of Various Adsorbents in Wastewater Remediation—A Review. Waste, 1, 775-805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Wegner, L., Burton, E.D., McCammon, C., Scheinost, A.C., Planer-Friedrich, B., Peiffer, S., et al. (2025) Ferrous Iron Oxidation in the Presence of Antimonate at Neutral Ph: Mutual Effects on Iron Mineral Products and Antimony Sequestration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 488, Article ID: 137380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Zhang, C., Liu, L., Chen, X., Dai, Y. and Jia, H. (2022) Mechanistic Understanding of Antimony(v) Complexation on Montmorillonite Surfaces: Insights from First-Principles Molecular Dynamics. Chemical Engineering Journal, 428, Article ID: 131157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Renard, F., Putnis, C.V., Montes-Hernandez, G., King, H.E., Breedveld, G.D. and Okkenhaug, G. (2018) Sequestration of Antimony on Calcite Observed by Time-Resolved Nanoscale Imaging. Environmental Science & Technology, 52, 107-113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] 孙倩, 王玉军, 范婷婷, 等. Sb(Ⅴ)在不同类型土壤上的吸附及其影响因素研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(8): 1507-1514.
[29] 宋文杰, 都达古拉, 谢志磊, 等. 两种合成施氏矿物对Sb(Ⅲ)的吸附特性[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2025, 44(5): 1365.
[30] Bagherifam, S., Brown, T.C., Bagherifam, S. and Baglieri, A. (2023) Sequential Extraction of Labile and Recalcitrant Fractions of Soil Organic Matter: A Case Study Focusing on Antimony (sb) in Humic Acids, Fulvic Acids and Humin Fractions of Long-Term Aged Contaminated Soils. Environmental Pollution, 327, Article ID: 121610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] 崔晓丹, 王玉军, 周东美. 水分管理对污染土壤中砷锑形态及有效性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(9): 1665.