基于传统教学媒介优化学生学习效果的综述研究
A Review Study on Optimizing Student Learning Outcomes Based on Traditional Teaching Media
摘要: 在数字化、平台化与智能化教学迅速扩张的背景下,传统教学媒介是否仍具有独立价值,已成为高等教育教学改革中的重要命题。围绕黑板书写、纸质教材、口头讲授、手写笔记与实体教具等传统媒介,本文以叙述性综述的方式系统梳理其在优化学生学习体验方面的研究进展与实践逻辑。本文综合中英文文献36篇,重点考察传统媒介在认知加工、课堂互动、学习动机、知识保持、情感支持与医学教育场景中的作用机制,并对传统媒介与数字技术融合的教学路径进行归纳。综述结果表明:第一,传统教学媒介并非数字环境中的“过时资源”,而是在深度加工、注意聚焦、课堂节奏控制和学习存在感建构方面具有稳定优势;第二,纸质阅读与手写记录在复杂文本理解、信息筛选、元认知监控与长期记忆保持方面仍表现出独特效能;第三,单纯强调技术替代往往难以持续提升学习体验,真正有效的路径是依据课程目标、学科性质与学生差异进行媒介组合和教学重构;第四,在医学教育等高负荷、高规范、强实践的专业课程中,传统教学媒介与网络资源、学习平台的优势互补更为明显。基于此,本文提出“目标导向–任务匹配–过程交互–结果评估”的传统媒介优化框架,并对医学院校教学改革中的课堂设计、资源建设、评价机制与教师发展提出建议。本文可为教改论文写作、课程改革实施以及《教育进展》类教育研究期刊投稿提供较为完整的综述基础。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the rapid expansion of digital, platform-based, and intelligent instruction, whether traditional teaching media still possess independent pedagogical value has emerged as a critical proposition in higher education reform. Focusing on traditional media—including blackboard writing, printed textbooks, oral lecturing, handwritten notes, and physical teaching aids—this narrative review systematically delineates their research progress and practical logic in optimizing the student learning experience. Synthesizing 36 Chinese and international studies, this paper examines the underlying mechanisms of traditional media across cognitive processing, classroom interaction, learning motivation, knowledge retention, emotional support, and medical education contexts. The synthesis demonstrates that rather than being obsolete resources, traditional media exhibit robust and stable advantages in facilitating deep information processing, regulating attentional focus, controlling classroom pacing, and constructing a sense of learning presence. In particular, paper-based reading and handwritten notation continue to show unique efficacy in complex text comprehension, metacognitive monitoring, and long-term memory retention. In highly structured, practice-intensive, and cognitively demanding professional courses such as medical education, the complementary synergy between traditional media and digital platforms becomes significantly more pronounced, proving that exclusive technological substitution seldom yields sustainable improvements. Premised on these insights, this paper proposes an optimization framework framed around “objectives orientation-task alignment-process interaction-outcome evaluation”, and offers targeted recommendations for classroom design, resource development, and faculty development, thereby providing a robust literature review foundation for educational reform initiatives and instructional research submissions.
文章引用:祁美慧、王靓怡, 傅纪婷, 刘婧, 刘惜墨, 吴晓丹. 基于传统教学媒介优化学生学习效果的综述研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(5): 2061-2071. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1651086

参考文献

[1] 王晋, 段斯亮, 张筱晨. 基于Android平台的生理学移动学习平台构建与应用[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(10): 930-935.
[2] 狄璇, 徐阳, 产晶晶, 等. 混合型教学与自主学习: 颠覆传统, 引领最佳学习模式[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(5): 611-616.
[3] 汤梦颖. 对高等学校数字化教学之思考[J]. 教育进展, 2021, 11(5): 1537-1544.
[4] 梁烨, 杨成敏, 杨梅玲, 等. 网络教育与传统教育在医学生培养中优势互补的体会[J]. 创新教育研究, 2023, 11(9): 2637-2643.
[5] Nortvig, A.M., Petersen, A.K. and Balle, S.H. (2018) A Literature Review of the Factors Influencing E-Learning and Blended Learning in Relation to Learning Outcome, Student Satisfaction and Engagement. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 16, 46-55.
https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1855
[6] Bouilheres, F., Le, L.T.V.H., McDonald, S., Nkhoma, C. and Jandug-Montera, L. (2020) Defining Student Learning Experience through Blended Learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3049-3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Poon, J. (2013) Blended Learning: An Institutional Approach for Enhancing Students’ Learning Experiences. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9, 271-289.
https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/poon_0613.pdf
[8] Vallée, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A. and Sorbets, E. (2020) Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22, e16504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R. and Baki, M. (2013) The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 115, 1-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A.F.M., Nincarean A/L Eh Phon, D., Abdullah, A., et al. (2019) Exploring the Role of Blended Learning for Teaching and Learning Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher Learning: An Empirical Investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 3433-3466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Zhou, T. and Zhang, W. (2022) Effectiveness Study on Online or Blended Language Learning Based on Student Achievement: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies. Sustainability, 14, Article 7303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Zhao, W. (2022) An Empirical Study on Blended Learning in Higher Education in “Internet + ” Era. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 8705-8722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Naz, B., Abbas, A. and Amjad, F. (2024) Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes through Blended Learning Strategies: An Empirical Study. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 5, 152-165.
https://ojs.jdss.org.pk/journal/article/view/1042
[14] Al-Soraiey-Alqahtani, A. (2010) The Effect of Using E-Learning, Blended Learning and Traditional Learning on Students’ Achievement and Attitudes in a Course on Islamic Culture: An Experimental Study. Doctoral Thesis, Durham University.
http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/817/
[15] Singer, L.M. and Alexander, P.A. (2017) Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87, 1007-1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Ross, B., Pechenkina, E., Aeschliman, C. and Chase, A. (2017) Print versus Digital Texts: Understanding the Experimental Research and Challenging the Dichotomies. Research in Learning Technology, 25, Article No. 1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Walsh, G. (2016) Screen and Paper Reading Research—A Literature Review. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 47, 160-173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Ackerman, R., Goldsmith, M. (2011) Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen versus on Paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 18-32.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-05714-002
[19] Rockinson-Szapkiw, A.J., Courduff, J., Carter, K. and Bennett, D. (2013) Electronic versus Traditional Print Textbooks: A Comparison Study on the Influence of University Students’ Learning. Computers & Education, 63, 259-266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A., Blasiman, R. and Hollis, R.B. (2019) Note-Taking Habits of 21st Century College Students: Implications for Student Learning, Memory, and Achievement. Memory, 27, 807-819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Lau, T.S. (2022) The Effect of Typewriting vs. Handwriting Lecture Notes on Learning: A Systematic Review and Me-ta-Analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Louisville.
https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd/3982/
[22] Flanigan, A.E., Wheeler, J., Colliot, T., Lu, J. and Kiewra, K.A. (2024) Typed versus Handwritten Lecture Notes and College Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article No. 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Friedman, M.C. (2014) Notes on Note-Taking: Review of Research and Insights for Students and Instructors. Harvard Initiative for Learning and Teaching.
https://u.osu.edu/rhodes-disalvo.1/files/2017/03/Notes-on-Note-Taking-qrs2kq.pdf
[24] Jansen, R.S., Lakens, D. and IJsselsteijn, W.A. (2017) An Integrative Review of the Cognitive Costs and Benefits of Notetaking. Educational Research Review, 22, 223-233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Santangelo, T. and Graham, S. (2016) A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Handwriting Instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 225-265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] 陈俊年. 基于《材料成形技术基础》课程教学方法的思考[J]. 教育进展, 2023, 13(8): 5906-5910.
[27] 柴橚, 史培媛, 蔡雨辰. 基于结构方程模型的英语专业混合式教学效果探析——以兰州大学英语专业为例[J]. 创新教育研究, 2021, 9(4): 1163-1175.
[28] 艾静, 孙敏. 数字媒体技术专业“数据结构”课程的教学研究[J]. 创新教育研究, 2022, 10(6): 1430-1435.
[29] 卢克勤. 基于微信平台提高英语语音水平的实践研究[J]. 教育进展, 2018, 8(3): 331-338.
[30] 朱馨怡. 基于ARCS动机模型的初中英语阅读教学设计——以译林版义务教育教科书《英语》八年级下册Unit 2的阅读教学为例[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(8): 350-357.
[31] 高格格, 郑悦丽, 孔博鉴. AIGC支持下的高中英语阅读教学研究——基于单元整体教学实践研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(3): 153-162.
[32] 周少聪, 李振杰, 俞小明, 王骏, 殷伟. 虚实交互下实践教学探索——以“巡检机器人无线充电装置”为例[J]. 职业教育发展, 2024, 13(6): 2114-2120.
[33] 徐峰, 姜国强, 姚彬启, 等. 新媒体赋能高校思想政治教育模式创新策略研究[J]. 创新教育研究, 2024, 12(1): 339-345.
[34] Nayar, B. and Koul, S. (2020) Blended Learning in Higher Education: A Transition to Experiential Classrooms. International Journal of Educational Management, 34, 1357-1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Al-Busaidi, K.A. (2013) An Empirical Investigation Linking Learners’ Adoption of Blended Learning to Their Intention of Full E-learning. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32, 1168-1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Wang, Y., Wu, J., Chen, F. and Li, J. (2024) Analyzing Teaching Effects of Blended Learning with LMS: An Empirical Investigation. IEEE Access, 12, 42343-42356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef