生态给养视域下留学生AI工具使用的性别滤镜与水平进阶
Gender Filter and Proficiency Progression in International Students’ Use of AI Tools from the Perspective of Ecological Affordance
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.145481, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 韩沛玲：对外经济贸易大学文学与国际传播学院，北京；范慧琴：中国传媒大学人文学院，北京
关键词: 人工智能；生态给养；IDA模型；性别；汉语水平；Artificial Intelligence； Ecological Affordance； IDA Model； Gender； Chinese Proficiency
摘要: 本文基于生态给养理论框架，通过考察性别与汉语水平对AI工具使用的影响，发现个体因素不直接决定行为，而是通过“动机滤镜”与“元认知阶梯”系统调节给养的“感知–解读–行动”转化路径，导致使用体验与效果的显著差异。研究构建的差异化给养实现(IDA)模型，为AI融合教学提供了可参考的理论解释与实践方向。
Abstract: Based on the theoretical framework of ecological affordance, this study examines the influence of gender and Chinese proficiency on the use of AI tools. It reveals that individual factors do not directly determine behavior but systematically moderate the transformation pathway of affordance from “perception-interpretation-action” through the “motivational filter” and “metacognitive ladder,” leading to significant differences in user experience and effectiveness. The proposed Individual Difference-Affordance Actualization (IDA) model provides a theoretical explanation and practical direction for AI-integrated teaching.
文章引用：韩沛玲, 范慧琴. 生态给养视域下留学生AI工具使用的性别滤镜与水平进阶[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(5): 966-980. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.145481

参考文献

[1] Gibson, J.J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[2] Van Lier, L. (2004) The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Kluwer Academic.
[3] 秦丽莉, 徐锦芬. 二语习得“生态给养”理论研究的哲学根源、学科属性与研究现状[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2025, 48(4): 70-82.
[4] Hampel, R. and Stickler, U. (2012) The Use of Videoconferencing to Support Multimodal Interaction in an Online Language Classroom. ReCALL, 24, 116-137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Song, Y. and Ma, Q. (2021) Affordances of a Mobile Learner‐Generated Tool for Pupils’ English as a Second Language Vocabulary Learning: An Ecological Perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52, 858-878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Qin, L. and Wei, R. (2021) Investigating Affordance in Technology-Enriched Language Learning Environment through Exploring Students’ Perezhivanija. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 44, 187-202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Zhang, R., Zou, D. and Cheng, G. (2025) ChatGPT Affordance for Logic Learning Strategies and Its Usefulness for Developing Knowledge and Quality of Logic in English Argumentative Writing. System, 128, Article ID: 103561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Chen, Z.Q., Zhu, X.H., Lu, Q. and Wei, W. (2024) L2 Students’ Barriers in Engaging with Form and Content-Focused AI-Generated Feedback in Revising Their Compositions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 39, 715-735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Kessler, G. (2018) Technology and the Future of Language Teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 205-218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Xie, Y., Chen, Y. and Ryder, L.H. (2019) Effects of Using Mobile-Based Virtual Reality on Chinese L2 Students’ Oral Proficiency. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34, 225-245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] 秦丽莉, 戴炜栋. 生态视阈下大学英语学习环境给养状况调查[J]. 现代外语, 2015, 38(2): 227-237+292.
[12] 秦丽莉, 欧阳西贝, 何艳华. 信息技术环境下语言教学/学习活动系统的“生态给养”转化有效性研究[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2021, 53(2): 251-262+320.
[13] Gardner, R.C. and Lambert, W.E. (1972) Attitudes and Motivation in Second-Language Learning. Newbury House.
[14] Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]