政策工具视角下中国安宁疗护与长期护理保险的制度耦合性
Policy Tool Perspective: Institutional Coupling of Palliative Care and Long-Term Care Insurance in China
摘要: 目的:基于政策工具的视角,分析安宁疗护与长期护理保险的政策文件,探讨两者在政策目标、服务内容、资源配置和实施机制等方面的耦合现状与问题,为实现“健康中国”与“积极老龄化”提供制度保障。方法:采用内容分析方法,构建“政策工具–制度要素–耦合机制”三维分析框架,对2016~2025年间国家与地方层面相关政策文本进行内容分析。结果:在安宁疗护和长期护理保险相关政策文件中,各类政策工具结构比列不均衡,环境型、供给型和需求型政策工具分别占比为80.44%、18.89%、0.67%和85.98%、9.28%、4.73%。结论:当前政策工具以环境型为主导,供给型与需求型工具应用不足;制度间存在目标重叠但协同机制缺失、资源分散且整合困难、评估标准不统一等问题。建议通过优化政策工具组合、构建跨部门协调机制、统一评估标准、强化筹资与支付联动等方式,提升制度耦合性,推动安宁疗护与长期照护保险的深度融合。
Abstract: Objective: From the perspective of policy tools, this paper analyzes the policy documents of hospice care and long-term care insurance, and discusses the current situation and problems of their coupling in terms of policy objectives, service content, resource allocation and implementation mechanism, so as to provide institutional guarantee for realizing Healthy China and Active Aging. Methods: Content analysis method was adopted to construct a three-dimensional analysis framework of “policy tools-institutional elements-coupling mechanism”, and content analysis was conducted on relevant national and local policy texts from 2016 to 2025. Results: In the relevant policy documents of hospice care and long-term care insurance, the structural proportion of various policy tools is unbalanced. The proportions of environmental, supply-oriented and demand-oriented policy tools are 80.44%, 18.89%, 0.67% and 85.98%, 9.28%, 4.73% respectively. Conclusion: At present, policy tools are dominated by environmental ones, while supply-oriented and demand-oriented tools are insufficiently applied. There are problems such as overlapping objectives but lack of coordination mechanism, scattered and difficult-to-integrate resources, and inconsistent evaluation standards among systems. Suggestions: It is suggested to improve institutional coupling by optimizing the combination of policy tools, building cross-departmental coordination mechanisms, unifying evaluation standards, and strengthening the linkage between financing and payment, so as to promote the in-depth integration of hospice care and long-term care insurance.
文章引用:向恣栎, 祁俊菊. 政策工具视角下中国安宁疗护与长期护理保险的制度耦合性[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(5): 458-467. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.135275

参考文献

[1] 徐阳. 多一份守护, 多一份期待[N]. 人民日报, 2025-11-18(04).
[2] https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202510/content_7046050.htm
[3] 陆杰华. 从点到面: “十五五”时期安宁疗护服务广覆盖的实践路径[J]. 人口与经济, 2026, 47(1): 27-32.
[4] 张嘉丽, 陈虹秀, 王艺霖, 等. 49个长期护理保险制度试点城市评估失能等级和长期照护需求的现状[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(19): 2384-2390.
[5] 王庆, 于保荣. 中国长期照护保险制度试点分析及未来发展的政策建议[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2021, 38(2): 3-7.
[6] 安秋玲. 我国安宁疗护的现状与展望[J]. 人民论坛, 2024(13): 42-45.
[7] 周维, 孙靖凯, 汪晓凡, 等. 我国老年人长期照护政策的问题分析及政策选择[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2021, 38(5): 39-41, 44.
[8] 陈振明. 政府工具研究与政府管理方式改进——论作为公共管理学新分支的政府工具研究的兴起、主题和意义[J]. 中国行政管理, 2004(6): 43-48.
[9] Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1985) Reindustrialization and Technology. Longman Group Limited.
[10] 剌媛媛, 祝贺, 王琦琦, 等. 政策工具视角下中国爱国卫生运动政策文本量化研究[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2024, 40(11): 1380-1389.
[11] 李宇阳, 周洪宇. 如何完善学校家庭社会协同育人机制——基于系统耦合理论的分析[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2023(8): 59-63.
[12] 屈伟, 袁晓宇, 刘毅. 政策工具视角下省级健康规划中的老年健康政策分析[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2025, 42(10): 1191-1195.
[13] 丁胜华, 刘永梅, 陈红娟, 等. 基于安宁疗护核心素养的医学照护能力框架构建与提升策略研究[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2025, 38(7): 943-948.
[14] Bai, C., Zhu, Z., Wang, T. and Li, M. (2026) Long-Term Care Insurance and Accessibility of Home and Community-Based Services for Older Adults: Evidence from China. Health Economics, Policy and Law. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 张跃华, 阎文溯, 卢倞, 等. 安宁疗护、善终与社会保障制度——概念厘定与理论分析[J]. 保险研究, 2025(2): 3-13.
[16] 黄泽欢, 辛孟东, 戚栎丹, 等. 医养融合安宁疗护模式的构成要素、经验及推广意义[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2025, 38(7): 914-923.
[17] Oduro, E., Mora, A., Lopez, R., Unroe, K., Akwobugi, M. and Carpenter, J. (2025) Implementing Palliative Care Consultation Programs in Nursing Homes: Key Stakeholders’ Perspectives. Innovation in Aging, 9, igaf122.4138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Cagle, J., Zhang, P., Becker, T., Floyd, A., Schwoyer-Morgan, T., Ridder, B., et al. (2025) Assessing Palliative Care Needs in Nursing Homes among Residents with Cognitive Impairment: UPLIFT Trial Findings. Innovation in Aging, 9, igaf122.3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef