固化土路面基层材料的双模量特性及数值分析
Bimodal Characteristics and Numerical Analysis of Solidified Soil Pavement Base Materials
DOI: 10.12677/ojtt.2026.153035, PDF,   
作者: 顾 跃:浙江海港嘉兴港务有限公司,浙江 嘉兴;董圆庆:沈阳建筑大学交通与测绘工程学院,辽宁 沈阳;孙本科:浙江交工集团股份有限公司,浙江 杭州;王金昌:浙江大学交通工程研究所,浙江 杭州
关键词: 道路工程固化土双模量有限元模拟三点弯曲试验Road Engineering Solidified Soil Bimodulus Finite Element Simulation Three-Point Bending Test
摘要: 为探究固化土路面基层材料在复杂应力状态下的力学响应,开展了室内小梁三点弯曲试验,并基于双模量理论建立了有限元数值计算模型。研究对比了传统单模量模型与考虑拉压异性的双模量模型在弯拉工况下的计算差异。结果表明:固化土材料具有显著的拉压模量差异特性;传统单模量模型计算的跨中挠度与实测值偏差较大,无法真实反映结构的变形行为;引入双模量本构关系后,有限元模拟结果与试验曲线吻合度显著提高。研究成果揭示了忽略拉压模量差异是导致传统设计偏不安全的重要原因,可为固化土路面基层的抗裂设计与寿命预估提供更精确的理论依据。
Abstract: To investigate the mechanical response of solidified soil pavement base materials under complex stress states, indoor three-point bending tests on small beams were conducted, and a finite element numerical calculation model was established based on the dual-modulus theory. The study compared the calculation differences between the traditional single-modulus model and the dual-modulus model considering tension-compression anisotropy under bending-tension conditions. The results show that solidified soil materials exhibit significant differences in tension and compression moduli; the mid-span deflection calculated by the traditional single-modulus model deviates significantly from the measured value, failing to accurately reflect the deformation behavior of the structure. After introducing the dual-modulus constitutive relation, the finite element simulation results showed a significant improvement in agreement with the experimental curves. The research findings reveal that neglecting the difference in tension and compression moduli is a significant reason for the unsafety of traditional designs, and can provide a more accurate theoretical basis for the crack-resistant design and life prediction of solidified soil pavement base materials.
文章引用:顾跃, 董圆庆, 孙本科, 王金昌. 固化土路面基层材料的双模量特性及数值分析[J]. 交通技术, 2026, 15(3): 393-402. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojtt.2026.153035

参考文献

[1] Ambartsumyan, S.A. and Khachatryan, A.A. (1966) The Basic Equations of the Theory of Elasticity for Materials with Different Tensile and Compressive Stiffness. Mechanics of Solids, 1, 29-34.
[2] Lytton, R.L., Uzan, J., Fernando, E.G., et al. (1993) Development and Validation of Performance Prediction Models and Specifications for Asphalt Binders and Paving Mixes. Strategic Highway Research Program.
[3] 沙爱民, 胡力群. 半刚性基层材料的结构特征[J]. 中国公路学报, 2008(4): 1-5, 42.
[4] Lv, S., Yuan, J., Liu, C., Wang, J., Li, J. and Zheng, J. (2019) Investigation of the Fatigue Modulus Decay in Cement Stabilized Base Material by Considering the Difference between Compressive and Tensile Modulus. Construction and Building Materials, 223, 491-502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 潘勤学, 郑健龙, 文丕华. 不同模量理论广义弹性定律的深入研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 46(1): 93-100.
[6] 潘勤学, 郑健龙. 考虑拉压模量不同的沥青路面力学计算方法与分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2020, 53(1): 110-117.
[7] Pan, Q.X., Zheng, J.L., Li, Q. and Wen, P.H. (2020) Fracture Analysis for Bi-Modular Materials. European Journal of MechanicsA/Solids, 80, Article ID: 103904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 潘勤学, 张同升, 魏玉峰, 等. 基于双模量理论的不同沥青路面力学分析[J]. 交通科学与工程, 2024, 40(4): 21-31.
[9] 潘勤学, 周殊睿, 胡嘉, 等. 基于双模量理论的半柔性路面结构分析[J]. 中外公路, 2025, 45(3): 74-82.
[10] 程怀磊, 孙立军, 郑健龙, 等. 沥青混合料动态压-拉双模量及其在路面响应分析中的应用[J]. 土木工程学报, 2022, 55(3): 105-116, 128.
[11] Dong, C., Wang, F., Wang, T., Zhao, L., Qian, P., Li, M., et al. (2025) A Finite Element Study of Bimodulus Materials with 2D Constitutive Relations in Non-Principal Stress Directions. Materials, 18, Article 5126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef