数字时代下老年人权益保障的路径转型:从“被动保护”走向“主动支持”
Transforming Approaches to Protecting the Rights of the Elderly in the Digital Age: From “Passive Protection” to “Active Support”
摘要: 随着我国深度老龄化社会与数字时代同步到来,老年人权益保障面临传统保护模式与数字社会现实需求之间的结构性张力。本文认为,既有以“弱者关怀”为核心的老年人权益保障思路,在实践中陷入保护过度与保护不足的双重困境。数字时代老年人权益受损呈现出隐蔽化、复合化、系统化的新特征,传统的个体救济型保护机制难以及时有效回应。本文提出,应当实现从“被动保护”向“主动支持”的路径转型,以尊重老年人自主性为核心,构建“法律保障–技术适老–社会协同”三位一体的保障体系,推动老年人从“被保护者”转变为权益保障的积极参与者。这一路径转型既是对积极老龄化理念的回应,也是对老年人作为权利主体地位的真正尊重。
Abstract: As China’s rapidly aging society coincides with the advent of the digital age, the protection of the rights and interests of the elderly faces structural tensions between traditional protection models and the practical demands of the digital society. This paper argues that the existing approach to safeguarding the rights of the elderly, centered on “care for the vulnerable,” has fallen into a dual dilemma of both overprotection and underprotection in practice. In the digital age, violations of the elderly’s rights exhibit new characteristics—namely, concealment, complexity, and systemic nature—making it difficult for traditional, individual-based remedial protection mechanisms to respond in a timely and effective manner. This paper proposes a paradigm shift from “passive protection” to “active support.” Centered on respecting the autonomy of the elderly, it advocates for the establishment of a three-pronged protection system integrating “legal safeguards, technology adapted for the elderly, and social collaboration,” thereby empowering the elderly to transition from “Protected person” to active participants in safeguarding their own rights. This paradigm shift not only responds to the concept of active aging but also constitutes a genuine respect for the elderly as rights-holders.
文章引用:刘宇杰. 数字时代下老年人权益保障的路径转型:从“被动保护”走向“主动支持”[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(5): 684-690. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.135304

参考文献

[1] 胡湛, 彭希哲. 应对中国人口老龄化的治理选择[J]. 中国社会科学, 2018(12): 134-155+202.
[2] 中国消费者协会公布2023年10大投诉热点[EB/OL].
http://www.ce.cn/cysc/newmain/yc/jsxw/202402/02/t20240202_38890209.shtml#:~:text=2023%E5%B9%B4%E5%85%A8%E5%9B%BD%E6%B6%88%E5%8D%8F%E7%BB%84%E7%BB%87%E5%85%B1%E5%8F%97%E7%90%86%E6%B6%88%E8%B4%B9%E8%80%85%E6%8A%95%E8%AF%891328496%E4%BB%B6%EF%BC%8C%E5%90%8C%E6%AF%94%E5%A2%9E%E9%95%BF15.33%25%EF%BC%8C%E8%A7%A3%E5%86%B31127440%E4%B, 2026-03-26.
[3] 李霞. 协助决定取代成年监护替代决定——兼论民法典婚姻家庭编监护与协助的增设[J]. 法学研究, 2019, 41(1): 100-118.
[4] 王利明. 人格权法研究[M]. 第三版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2022: 412.
[5] 杨立新. 我国老年监护制度的立法突破及相关问题[J]. 法学研究, 2013, 35(2): 119-130.
[6] 张欣. 算法公平的类型构建与制度实现[J]. 中外法学, 2024, 36(4): 866-883.
[7] 电信网络诈骗犯罪高发检察机关2023年起诉5万余人[EB/OL].
https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/xwfbh/wsfbt/202403/t20240303_646932.shtml, 2026-03-30.
[8] 公安机关打击治理电信网络诈骗犯罪成效显著2023年1至11月破案39.1万起8月以来发案数连续下降[EB/OL].
https://www.mps.gov.cn/n2254314/n6409334/c9367681/content.html, 2024-01-05.
[9] 公安部刑事侦查局. 公安部: 2023年共破获电信网络诈骗案件43.7万起[EB/OL]. 2024.
https://www.chinanews.com.cn/gn/2024/01-09/10142690.shtml, 2024-01-09.
[10] 数读银行理财市场.《2022年中国银行理财产品实际运作报告》正式发布! [EB/OL]. 南方财经全媒体集团.
https://caifuhao.eastmoney.com/news/20230426145635582124680, 2023-04-26.
[11] 徐洁, 燕颖川. 算法年龄歧视的现实挑战与规制路径[J]. 学术交流, 2023(7): 134-155.
[12] 左美云. 老年友好型社会导向的智慧技术适老化[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2023(2): 32-39.
[13] 胡湛, 彭希哲, 吴玉韶. 积极应对人口老龄化的“中国方案” [J]. 中国社会科学, 2022(9): 46-66+205.
[14] WHO (2002) Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. WHO.
[15] Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
[16] 王磊, 林森, 赵晔. 日本介护保险制度改革及其启示[J]. 地方财政研究, 2013(5): 75-80.
[17] 和红. 德国社会长期护理保险制度改革及其启示: 基于福利治理视角简[J]. 德国研究, 2016, 31(3): 58-72+126.
[18] 刘涛. 德国长期护理保险制度的缘起、运行、调整与改革[J]. 安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 49(1): 74-86.
[19] 徐振华, 胡苷用. 新加坡《赡养父母法》评介及其对我国的启示[J]. 江西社会科学, 2012, 32(9): 151-155.
[20] 张伶俐. “智慧国家”背景下新加坡老年人数字融入的举措与启示[J]. 成人教育, 2023, 43(4): 73-80.