“临川四梦”中“至情”思想的演变与超越
The Evolution and Transcendence of the “Utmost Emotion” Thought in the “Four Dreams of Linchuan”
DOI: 10.12677/cnc.2026.143099, PDF,   
作者: 谢 为:新疆师范大学中国语言文学学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 汤显祖临川四梦至情思想Tang Xianzu Four Dreams of Linchuan Ideal of Utmost Emotion
摘要: 汤显祖作为晚明主情文艺思潮的集大成者,以“至情”为精神内核创作的《临川四梦》,并非四部独立的戏曲作品,而是一条逻辑严密、层层递进的思想演进之路。本文以“情–道”的内在升华为核心线索,结合《紫钗记》《牡丹亭》《南柯记》《邯郸记》的曲词、题词与创作背景,梳理汤显祖“至情”思想的完整流变。文章认为,汤显祖的至情思想绝非对世俗情欲的简单张扬,也非对情感的彻底否定,而是以个体之情为起点,经过现实抗争、欲望反思、精神融通,最终升华为超越功利、生死与世俗桎梏的生命大道。这一思想轨迹,既是汤显祖个人仕途坎坷与生命体悟的精神写照,也是晚明文人在心学、禅学与社会变局中寻求精神出路的集中反映。
Abstract: As the culmination of the late Ming Dynasty’s sentiment-focused literary movement, Tang Xianzu’s “Four Dreams of Linchuan”—created with “supreme emotion” as its spiritual core—constitutes not four isolated theatrical works, but a logically coherent and progressively layered intellectual evolution. This study traces the complete development of Tang’s “supreme emotion” philosophy through the lens of “emotion-transcendence”, analyzing lyrics, inscriptions, and creative contexts from The Purple Hairpin, The Peony Pavilion, The Dream of Nanke, and The Story of Handan. The research demonstrates that Tang’s supreme emotion philosophy neither simplistically glorifies worldly desires nor completely negates emotions. Instead, it begins with individual emotions, progresses through real-world struggles, desire introspection, and spiritual integration, ultimately elevating to a life philosophy transcending utilitarianism, mortality, and societal constraints. This intellectual trajectory not only reflects Tang’s personal struggles in officialdom and life reflections, but also epitomizes how late Ming literati sought spiritual solutions amidst Neo-Confucianism, Zen philosophy, and social upheavals.
文章引用:谢为. “临川四梦”中“至情”思想的演变与超越[J]. 国学, 2026, 14(3): 711-715. https://doi.org/10.12677/cnc.2026.143099

参考文献

[1] 汤显祖. 牡丹亭记·题词[M]//毛晋, 编. 六十种曲. 北京: 中华书局, 1958.
[2] 刘一丁. 论“临川四梦”之“梦”与“至情”内涵[J]. 文学艺术周刊, 2023(18): 17-19.
[3] 许珮珩. 从汤显祖“记梦诗”看“临川四梦”的至情书写[J]. 大众文艺, 2020(13): 26-27.
[4] 申宁宁, 熊俊敏. 浅谈“临川四梦”其“因梦成戏”的美学特征[J]. 明日风尚, 2019(15): 176-177.
[5] 李劲松. 戏台之后——“临川四梦”与汤显祖的思想转折[J]. 文化学刊, 2024(10): 218-221.
[6] 李骋昊.《临川四梦》中的汤式至情论思想[J]. 青年文学家, 2017(21): 142-143.
[7] 康保成, 陈燕芳. “临川四梦”说的来由与《牡丹亭》的深层意蕴[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(3): 53-65.
[8] 杜桂萍. 从“临川四梦”到《临川梦》——汤显祖与蒋士铨的精神映照和戏曲追求[J]. 文学遗产, 2016(4): 14-30.
[9] 任怡姗. 发乎情, 止乎礼义——从“临川四梦”看汤显祖的至情论[J]. 长春工程学院学报(社会科学版), 2012, 13(3): 75-77.
[10] 李法亮. 以临川四梦为例看汤显祖的“至情论”戏剧思想[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 江西师范大学, 2016.