包容性视角下数字融入对老年人主观幸福感的影响研究——以南京市为例
Research on the Impact of Digital Inclusion on Subjective Well-Being of the Elderly from an Inclusive Perspective—Taking Nanjing City as an Example
摘要: 在人口老龄化与数字化双重时代背景下，老年人数字融入与主观幸福感的关系成为多学科研究的热点。本研究以南京市305名60周岁及以上老年人为研究对象，基于数字鸿沟理论、感知价值理论和社会支持理论，从关联性角度系统探究包容性视角下数字融入与老年人主观幸福感的关联机制。结果表明：南京市老年人数字融入水平与主观幸福感均处于中等偏上水平，二者呈显著正相关(β = 0.657, p < 0.01)；统计分析显示，社会参与在数字融入与幸福感的正向关联中发挥关键中介作用，非正式支持的来源则发挥显著调节作用；而社会比较与认知压力的负向关联不显著。异质性分析显示，数字融入与幸福感的正相关在男性、低龄与高龄老年人、中等教育水平群体以及独居和机构养老群体中更为突出。研究从政府、行业、社会、个人四个层面提出优化数字包容生态、完善政策保障、强化多元支持的对策建议，为推动老年人共享数字红利、提升主观幸福感提供理论参考与实践指导。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of dual challenges posed by population aging and digital transformation, the relationship between digital inclusion and subjective well-being among the elderly has become a multidisciplinary research focus. This study examined 305 seniors aged 60 and above in Nanjing City, employing questionnaire surveys and stratified regression analysis grounded in digital divide theory, perceived value theory, and social support theory to systematically investigate the associative mechanisms between digital inclusion and subjective well-being from an inclusive perspective. Results demonstrated that both digital inclusion levels and subjective well-being among elderly residents in Nanjing exhibited moderately high performance, showing a significant positive correlation (β = 0.657, p < 0.01). Statistical analysis reveals that social participation plays a key mediating role in the positive relationship between digital inclusion and well-being, while informal support sources serve as a significant moderator. The negative effects of social comparison and cognitive stress were not significant. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the positive relationship between digital inclusion and well-being is more pronounced among males, younger and older adults, individuals with secondary education, as well as those living alone or in institutional care. The research proposes policy recommendations to optimize the digital inclusion ecosystem, enhance policy safeguards, and strengthen multi-dimensional support across four dimensions.
文章引用：周鑫越, 缪薛, 李茹晔, 陈一僖, 安彦蓉. 包容性视角下数字融入对老年人主观幸福感的影响研究——以南京市为例[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(6): 18-32. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.136320

参考文献

[1] 任婷岚. 贵州老年人数字融入对主观幸福感的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 贵阳: 贵州财经大学, 2024.
[2] Warschauer, M. (2004) Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. The MIT Press.
[3] van Dijk, J. and Hacker, K. (2003) The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon. The Information Society, 19, 315-326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] 武文颖, 郑文学. 能与力: 老年群体数字融入的困境与纾解[J]. 新媒体与社会, 2025(6): 279-292, 487.
[5] 陈成文, 孙嘉悦. 社会融入: 一个概念的社会学意义[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2012, 41(6): 66-71.
[6] 邱泽奇, 张樹沁, 刘世定, 等. 从数字鸿沟到红利差异——互联网资本的视角[J]. 中国社会科学, 2016(10): 93-115, 203-204.
[7] 杨燚青, 袁爱清. 数智时代老年人的数字融入困境与解困之思——基于数字代沟与反哺的双重视角[J]. 全媒体探索, 2024(10): 137-140.
[8] Van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (2006) Digital Divide Research, Achievements and Short Comings. Poetics, 34, 221-235.
[9] Von Kardorff, E. (2019) Castells (1996): The Rise of the Network Society. In: Holzer, B. and Stegbauer, C., Eds., Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung, Springer VS, 105-109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 经合组织: 2021年数字教育展望[J]. 中国教育网络, 2021(9): 37.
[11] 杜鹏, 韩文婷. 互联网与老年生活: 挑战与机遇[J]. 人口研究, 2021, 45(3): 3-16.
[12] 周裕琼. 数字代沟与文化反哺: 对家庭内“静悄悄的革命”的量化考察[J]. 现代传播: 中国传媒大学学报, 2014, 36(2): 117-123.
[13] Czaja, S.J., Charness, N., Fisk, A.D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S.N., Rogers, W.A., et al. (2006) Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21, 333-352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 雷晓康, 陈泽鹏. 促进还是抑制: 互联网使用对老年人主观幸福感的影响研究[J]. 海南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 42(4): 58-68.
[15] 王前, 叶亚男, 朱文娟. 数字素养对老年人主观幸福感的影响研究——基于社会参与和社会适应性的链式中介模型[J]. 南京医科大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 25(6): 547-556.
[16] 周烁, 张文韬. 互联网使用的主观福利效应分析[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(9): 158-174.
[17] Zeithaml, V.A. (1988) Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐